Cover not available
Article published In:
Asia-Pacific Language Variation
Vol. 1:2 (2015) ► pp.190–219

Differentiating ‘dialect’ and ‘language’ in sign languages

A case study of two signing varieties in Indonesia

The distinction between languages and dialects has remained a controversial issue in literature. When such a distinction is made, it often has far-reaching implications in top-down language promotion and preservation policies that tend to favor only those varieties that are labelled as ‘languages’. This issue is of critical importance for the survival of most sign language varieties in the world from a socio-political point of view. Against this background, this paper discusses how the notions of ‘dialect’ and ‘language’ have been applied in classifying sign languages in the past few decades. In particular, the paper reports on two recent studies which provide linguistic evidence that the signing varieties used by Deaf signers in Jakarta and Yogyakarta in Indonesia should be regarded as distinct sign languages rather than mutually intelligible dialects of Indonesian Sign Language. The evidence comes from significant differences in the lexicon, preferred word order for encoding transitive events, and use of mouth actions. Our result suggests that signing varieties within a country can be significantly different from each other, thus calling for more concerted efforts in documenting and recognizing these differences if the linguistic needs of the signing communities are to be met.
Keywords: sign language, language-dialect distinction, mutual intelligibility, lexicostatistics, word order, mouth actions, Indonesia
Published online: 31 December 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aplv.1.2.04sze
References (77)
Al-fityani, Kinda, & Padden, Carol (2008). A lexical comparison of sign languages in the Arab World. In Ronice Müller deQuadros (Ed.), Sign languages: Spinning and unraveling the past, present and future. TISLR9, forty five papers and three posters from the 9th Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research Conference, Florianopolis, Brazil, December 2006 (pp. 2–14). EditoraArara Azul. Petrópolis/RJ. Brazil. Retrieved May 25, 2014, from [URL]
Aronoff, Mark, Meir, Irit, & Sandler, Wendy (2005). The paradox of sign language morphology. Language, 811, 301–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Charles-James N. (1973). Variation and linguistic theory. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bank, Richard, Crasborn, Onno, & van Hout, Roelan (2011). Variation in mouth actions with manual signs in Sign language of the Netherlands (NGT). Sign Language and Linguistics, 141, 248–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickford, J. Albert (1989). Lexical variation in Mexican Sign Language. Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, 331, 1–29.Google Scholar
(1991). Lexical variation in Mexican Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 721, 241–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blair, Frank (1990). Survey on a shoestring: A manual for small-scale language surveys. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics; University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Branson, Jan, Miller, Don, & Marsaja, I. Gede (1996). Everybody here speaks sign language too: A Deaf village in Bali, Indonesia. In Ceil Lucas (Ed.), Multicultural aspects of sociolinguistics of Deaf communities (pp. 39–57). Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle, & Poser, William J. (2008). Language classification: History and methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casad, Eugene H. (1974). Dialect intelligibility testing. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Chan, Marjorie, & Xu, Wang (2009). Modality effects revisited: Iconicity in Chinese Sign Language (CSL). In James Tai & Jane Tsay (Eds.), Taiwan Sign Language and beyond (pp. 49–81). Taiwan: The Taiwan Institute for the Humanities, National Chung Cheng University.Google Scholar
China Association of the Deaf (1988). Chinese Sign Language. Beijing: Hua Xia Publisher.Google Scholar
(1990). Chinese Sign Language, Part 2. Beijing: Hua Xia Publisher.Google Scholar
(2003). Chinese Sign Language (new ed.). Beijing: Hua Xia Publisher.Google Scholar
(2009). Basic signs in Chinese Sign Language. Beijing: Hua Xia Publisher.Google Scholar
Crowley, Terry, & Bowern, Claire (2010). An introduction to historical linguistics (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crowley, Terry (1997). An introduction to historical linguistics (3rd ed.). Auckland: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, David (2005). How language works. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Currie, Anne-Marie, Meier, Richard, & Walters, Keith (2002). A cross-linguistic examination of the lexicons of four signed languages. In Richard Meier, Kearsy Cormier, & David Quinto-Pozos (Eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken language (pp. 224–236). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deaf Sign Language (2014). In M. Paul Lewis, Gary F. Simons, & Charles D. Fennig (Eds.), Ethnologue: Languages of the world (17th ed.). Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Retrieved August 7, 2014, from [URL]Google Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof, & Lundin-Åkesson, Katarina (2005). Håller språket ihop Norden? En forskningsrapport om ungdomars förståelse av danska, svenska och norska. [Does the language keep together the Nordic countries? A research report of mutualcomprehension between young Danes, Swedes and Norwegians.] Copenhagen: Nordiskaministerrådet. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Vos, Connie (2012). Sign-spatiality in Kata Kolok: How a village sign language of Bali inscribes its signing space. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Max Planck Institute for Psycholingusitics, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Endangered Languages (2014). In M. Paul Lewis, Gary F. Simons, & Charles D. Fennig (Eds.), Ethnologue: Languages of the world (17th ed.). Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Retrieved August 7, 2014, from [URL]Google Scholar
Fischer, Susan (1974). Sign language and linguistic universals. In Christian Rohrer & Nicolas Ruwet (Eds.), Actes du Colloque France-Allemand de GrammaireTransformationnelle, Band II: Etudes de SemantiqueetAutres (pp. 187–204). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
(1975). Influences on word-order change in American Sign Language. In Charles Li (Ed.), Word order and word order change (pp. 1–25). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Susan, & Janis, Wynne (1990). Verb sandwiches in American Sign Language. In Siegmund Prillwitz & Tomas Vollhaber (Eds.), Current trends in European sign language research (pp. 279–293). Hamburg: SignumVerlag.Google Scholar
Goosken, Charlotte (2007). The contribution of linguistic factors to the intelligibility of closely related languages. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 28(6), 445–467. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Groce, Ellen (1985). Everyone here spoke sign language: Hereditary deafness on Martha’s Vineyard. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Roy (1990). The dialect myth. In Jerold A. Edmondson, Crawford Feagin, & Peter Mühlhäusler (Eds.), Development and diversity: Language variation across time and space: A festschrift for Charles-James N. Bailey (pp. 3–19). Publications in Linguistics 93. Arlington: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
He, Jia (2011). Instrumental classifier predicates in Tianjin Sign Language. Unpublished M.Phil. dissertation, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Hickmann, Maya (2003). Children’s discourse: Person, space and time across languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hilton, Nanna Haug, Schüppert, Anja, & Gooskens, Charlotte (2011). Syllable reduction and articulation rates in Danish, Norwegian and Swedish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 34(2), 215–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hurlbut, Hope M. (2003). A preliminary survey of the signed languages of Malaysia. In Anne Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde, & Onno Crasborn (Eds.), Cross-linguistic perspectives in sign language research: Selected papers from TISLR 2000 (pp. 31–46). Hamburg: Signum Verlag.
. (2008a). A survey of sign language in Taiwan. SIL Electronic Survey Reports 2008-001. SIL International. Retrieved August 4, 2014, from [URL]
. (2008b). Philippine signed languages survey: A rapid appraisal. SIL Electronic Survey Reports 2008-010. SIL International. Retrieved August 4, 2014, from [URL]
. (2009). Thai signed languages survey—A rapid appraisal. SIL Electronic Survey Reports2009-016. SIL International. Retrieved August 12, 2014, from [URL]
. (2012). A lexicostatistic survey of the signed languages in Nepal. SIL Electronic Survey Reports 2012-021. SIL International. Retrieved August 12, 2014, from [URL]
. (2014). The signed languages of Indonesia: An enigma. SIL Electronic Survey Reports 2014-005. SIL International. Retrieved August 14, 2014, from [URL]
Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture (1997). Sistem Isyarat Bahasa Indonesia. [Signed System of Indonesian]. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.Google Scholar
Isma, Tenrisara Pertiwi Silva (2012). Signing varieties in Jakarta and Yogyakarta: dialects or separate languages?. Unpublished Masters dissertation, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Johnston, Trevor (2003). BSL, AUSLAN and NZSL: Three signed languages or one? In Anne Baker, Beppievan den Bogaerde, & Onno Crasborn (Eds.), Cross-linguistic perspectives in sign language research: Selected papers from TISLR 2000 (pp. 47–69). Hamburg : Signum.
Klima, Edward, & Bellugi, Ursula (1979). The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred (1992). Historical linguistics: An introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul, Simons, Gary F., & Fennig, Charles D. (Eds.). (2014). Ethnologue: Languages of the World (17th ed.). Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Retrieved May 2, 2014, from [URL]Google Scholar
Mair, Victor (1991). What is a Chinese “dialect/topolect”? Reflections on some key Sino-English linguistic terms. Sino-Platonic Papers, 291, 1–52.Google Scholar
Marsaja, I. Gede (2008). Desa Kolok ‐ A Deaf village and its sign language in Bali, Indonesia. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Maurud, Ø (1976). Nabo språksforståelse i Skandinavia. En undersøkelse omgjensidig forståelse av tale- og skriftspråk i Danmark, Norge og Sverige. [Neighbouringlanguage comprehension in Scandinavia: An investigation of mutual comprehension of written and spoken language in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden] Stockholm: Nordiskarådet.Google Scholar
McArthur, Tom (1998). The English languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKee, David, & Kennedy, Graeme (2000). Lexical comparisons of signs from American, Australian, British and New Zealand Sign Languages. In Karen Emmorey, & Harlan Lane (Eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima (pp. 49–76). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Padden, Carol (2010). Sign language geography. In Gaurav Mathur, & Donna Jo Napoli (Eds.), Deaf around the world (pp.19–37). New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palfreyman, Nick (2013). Form, function, and the grammaticalisation of completive markers in the sign language varieties of Solo and Makassar. In John Bowden (Ed.), Tense, aspect, mood, and evidentiality in languages of Indonesia (pp.153–172). NUSA 55.Google Scholar
Parkhurst, Stephen, & Parkhurst, Diane (2007). Spanish sign language survey. SIL Electronic Survey Reports 2007-008. SIL International. Retrieved August 10, 2014, from [URL]
Senghas, Richard J., Senghas, Ann, & Pyers, Jennie E. (2005). The emergence of Nicaraguan Sign Language: Questions of development, acquisition, and evolution. In Sue Taylor Parker, Jonas Langer, & Constance Milbrath (Eds.), Biology and knowledge revisited: From neurogenesis to psychogenesis (pp. 287–306). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, Tove (2000). Linguistic genocide in education, or worldwide diversity and human rights. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Staley, Beverley (1998). Report of the Sign Language situation in Canada. Unpublished manuscript, SIL International.
Su, Shiou-fen, & Tai, James Hao-Yi (2009). Lexical comparison of signs from Taiwan, Chinese, Japanese, and American Sign Languages: Taking iconicity into account. In James Hao-Yi Tai, & Jane Chia-Yi Tsay (Eds.), Taiwan Sign Language and beyond (pp. 149–176). Taiwan: The Taiwan Institute for the Humanities, National Chung Cheng University.Google Scholar
Summer Institute of Linguistics. (1991). Language Assessment Criteria Statement, Notes On Scripture in Use and Language Programs, 281, 44–48.Google Scholar
Swadesh, Morris (1950). Salish internal relationships. International Journal of American Linguistics, 161, 157–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1952). Lexicostatistic dating of prehistoric ethnic contacts. Proceedings American Philosophical Society, 961, 452–463.Google Scholar
(1955). Towards greater accuracy in lexicostatistic dating. International Journal of American Linguistics, 211, 121–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1972). What is glottochronology? In Morris Swadesh & J. Sherzer (Eds.), The origin and diversification of language (pp. 271–284). London: Routledge; Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Swanenberg, Jos (2013). All dialects are equal, but some dialects are more equal than others. Tilburg Papers in Cultural Studies, 431, 1–11.Google Scholar
Suwiryo, Adhika Irlang (2013). The pattern of mouthings and mouth gestures in Jakarta Sign Language and Yogyakarta Sign Language: A comparative study. Unpublished masters dissertation, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Sze, Felix (2003). Word order of Hong Kong Sign Language. In Ann Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde, & Onno Crasborn (Eds.), Cross-linguistic perspectives in sign language research. Selected papers from TISLR 2000 (pp. 163–192). Hamburg: Signum.
Sze, Felix, Lo, Connie, Lo, Lisa, & Chu, Kenny (2013). Historical development of Hong Kong Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 13(2), 155–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The Problem of Language Identification (2014). In M. Paul Lewis, Gary F. Simons, & Charles D. Fennig (Eds.), Ethnologue: Languages of the world (17th ed.). Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Retrieved July 30, 2014, from [URL]Google Scholar
Tulloch, Shelley (2006). Preserving dialects of an endangered language. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7(2-3), 269–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van de Sande, Inge (2009). Lexically bound mouth actions in Sign Language of the Netherlands: A comparison between two registers and two age groups. Unpublished masters dissertation. Radboud University, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Volterra, Virginia, Laudanna, Alessandro, Corazza, Serena, Radutzdy, Elena, & Natale, Francesco (1984). Italian Sign Language: The order of elements in the declarative sentence. In Filip Loncke, Penny Boyes-Braem, & Yvan Lebrun (Eds.), Recent research on European Sign Languages (pp. 19–48). Lisse: Swets; Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Winzer, Margret (1993). Education, urbanization, and the deaf Community: A case study of Toronto, 1870-1990. In John Van Cleve (Ed.), Deaf history unveiled (pp.127–145). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, James (1978). Historical bases of American Sign Language. In Patricia Siple (Ed.), Understanding language through sign language research (pp. 333–348). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1991). Sign language varieties in Costa Rica. Sign Language Studies, 731, 329–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993a). Intuitive judgments of Hong Kong signers about the relationship of sign language varieties in Hong Kong and Shanghai. CUHK papers in Linguistics, 41, 88–98.Google Scholar
(1993b). Lexical evidence for the existence of South Asian and East Asian sign language families. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 4(2), 91–106.Google Scholar
(1996). Modern standard Thai Sign Language, influence from ASL, and its relationship to original Thai sign varieties. Sign Language Studies, 921, 227–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Sign languages and Deaf identities in Thailand and Vietnam. In Leila Monaghan, Constanze Schmaling, Karen Nakamura, & Graham Turner (Eds.), Many ways to be Deaf (pp. 283–301). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Yi, Yu-min (2008). A linguistic survey report of Shanghai Sign Language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Fudan University, Shanghai.
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Palfreyman, Nick & Adam Schembri
2022. Lumping and splitting: Sign language delineation and ideologies of linguistic differentiation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 26:1 ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Palfreyman, Nick
2020. Macro and micro-social variation in Asia-Pacific sign languages. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 6:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Tkachman, Oksana & Irit Meir
2018. Novel compounding and the emergence of structure in two young sign languages. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Bibliography. Journal of Sociolinguistics 26:1 ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.