Cover not available
Article published In:
Asia-Pacific Language Variation
Vol. 4:1 (2018) ► pp.1–35

Gender variation in signs of sexual behaviour in Hong Kong Sign Language

 | The Chinese University of Hong Kong
This paper discusses possible gender variation in the signs of sexual behaviour in Hong Kong Sign Language (HKSL). The data comes from a research project that aims at documenting and analyzing sex-related signs in this sign language for the sake of producing materials for sex education and interpreter training programs. Since sex is a highly taboo topic, euphemistic signs for the target concepts were collected and analyzed. This paper presents evidence that linguistic variation of neutral and euphemistic expressions of sex-related concepts exists in HKSL, and that gender plays a role in the choice of some but not all variants and their euphemistic counterparts.
Keywords: sexual signs, gender differences, linguistic variation, euphemisms, Hong Kong Sign Language
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Sociolinguistic variation in signed and spoken languages
    • 1.2Taboos and euphemisms in spoken and signed languages
  • 2.Research questions and methodology
    • 2.1Research questions
    • 2.2Methodology
      • 2.2.1Informants
      • 2.2.2Elicitation materials and methods
  • 3.Findings and discussions
    • 3.1Sex-related expressions in HKSL
    • 3.2Signing variation in the signs of sexual behaviours in HKSL
    • 3.3The roles of gender in the choice of linguistic variants
    • 3.4Euphemistic expressions and the role of gender in the use of these expressions
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 17 September 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aplv.17002.wei
References (56)
References
Allan, Keith, & Burridge, Kate (1991). Euphemism and dysphemism: Language used as shield and weapon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2006). Forbidden words. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersson, Lars, & Trudgill, Peter (1990). Bad language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtiar, Mohsen (2011). Assessing the offensiveness level of taboo words in Persian. The Journal of International Social Research, 4(19), 15–24.Google Scholar
Chen, Yijun, & Tai, James H. Y. (2009). Lexical variation and change in Taiwan Sign Language. In James H. -Y. Tai & Jane Tsay (Eds.), Taiwan Sign Language and beyond (pp. 131–148). Chia-Yi, Taiwan: The Taiwan Institute for the Humanities, National Chung Cheng University.Google Scholar
Crasborn, Onno, van der Kooij, Els, Waters, Dafydd, Woll, Bencie, & Mesch, Johanna (2008). Frequency distribution and spreading behavior of different types of mouth actions in three sign languages. Sign Language & Linguistics, 11(1), 45–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colville, Martin, & Steward, Colin (1998). Signs of a sexual nature: An introduction to some sexual signs used in British Sign Language. UK: Cheshire Society for the Deaf.Google Scholar
Cormier, Kearsy, Fenlon, Jordan, Johnston, Trevor, Rentelis, Ramas, Schembri, Adam, Rowley, Katherine, Woll, Bencie (2012). From corpus to lexical database to online dictionary: Issues in annotation of the BSL corpus and the development of BSL SignBank. In Onno Crasborn, E. Efthimiou, E. Fotinea, T. Hanke, J. Kristoffersen, & J. Mesch (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on the Representation of Sign Languages: Interactions between Corpus and Lexicon [workshop part of 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Turkey, Istanbul LREC] (pp. 7–12). Paris: ELRA.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (2011). Gender and Sociolinguistic Variation. In Jennifer Coates & Pia Pichler (Eds.), Language & gender (pp. 57–66). UK: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Epstein, Joseph (1985). Sex and euphemism. In Dennis Joseph Enright (Ed.), Fair of speech: The uses of euphemism (pp. 56–71). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fenlon, Jordan, Schembri, Adam, Rentelis, Ramas, & Cormier, Kearsy (2013). Variation in handshape and orientation in British Sign Language: The case of the ‘1’ hand configuration. Language & Communication, 33(1), 69–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geraci, Carlo, Battaglia, Katia, Cardinaletti, Anna, Cecchetto, Carlo, Donati, Caterina, Giudice, Serena, & Mereghetti, Emiliano (2011). The LIS corpus project: A discussion of sociolinguistic variation in the lexicon. Sign Language Studies, 11(4), 528–574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hysi, Eglantina (2011). Aspects of taboos and euphemisms in women’s language. Mediterrenean Journal of Social Sciences, 2(3), 379–383.Google Scholar
Isobe, Diago, Imai, Mika, Ikeda, Masumi, & Sze, Felix (2012). Phonological processes in Japanese Sign Language. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Research Symposium of the Japanese Association of Sign Linguistics, Guma University.
Johnston, Trevor, & Schembri, Adam (2007). Australian Sign Language (Auslan): An introduction to sign language linguistics. West Nyack, New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William (1991). The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change, 2(2), 205–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, & Johnson, Mark (1987). The metaphorical logic of rape. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 2(1), 73–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leeson, Lorraine, & Grehan, Carmel (2004). To the lexicon and beyond: The effect of gender on variation in Irish Sign Language. In Mieke Van Herreweghe & Myriam Vermeerbergen (Eds.), To the lexicon and beyond: Sociolinguistics in European Deaf Communities (pp. 39–73). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Linfoot-Ham, Kerry (2005). The linguistics of euphemism: A diachronic study of euphemism formation. Journal of Language and Linguistics, 4(2), 227–263.Google Scholar
Lucas, Ceil, Bayley, Robert, & Valli, Clayton (2001). Sociolinguistic variation in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). What’s your sign for PIZZA? An introduction to variation in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Lucas, Ceil, Bayley, Robert, Rose, Mary, & Wulf, Alyssa (2002). Location variation in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 2(4), 407–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGlone, Matthew S., & Batchelor, Jennifer A. (2003). Looking out for number one: Euphemism and face. Journal of Communication, 53(2), 251–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKee, David, McKee, Rachel, & Major, George (2011). Numeral variation in New Zealand Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 12(1), 72–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKee, Rachel, & McKee, David (2011). Old signs, new signs, whose signs? Sociolinguistic variation in the New Zealand Sign Language lexicon. Sign Language Studies, 11(4), 485–527. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mirus, Gene, Fisher, Jami, & Napoli, Donna Jo (2012). Taboo expressions in American Sign Language. Lingua, 122(9), 1004–1020. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo, Fischer, Jami, & Mirus, Gene (2013). Bleached taboo-term predicates in American Sign Language. Lingua, 1231, 148–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nash, Walter (1995). Fair words and foul. In Jan Svartvik (Ed.), Words: Proceedings of an international symposium, 361 (pp. 23–38). Kungl: Vitterhets Historie och Antikvitets Akademien.Google Scholar
Nichols, Patricia C. (2011). Black women in the rural south: Conservative and innovative. In Jennifer Coates & Pia Pichler (Eds.), Language and gender (pp. 57–66). UK: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven (2003). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York: Penguin Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Pyers, Jennie E. (2006). Indicating the body: Expression of body part terminology in American Sign Language. Language Sciences, 28 (2–3), 280–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rawson, Hugh (1981). A dictionary of euphemisms and other doubletalk. New York: Crown Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Schembri, Adam, & Johnston, Trevor (2007). Sociolinguistic variation in the use of fingerspelling in Australian Sign Language: A pilot study. Sign Language Studies, 7(3), 319–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schermer, Trude (2003). From variant to standard: An overview of the standardization process of the lexicon of sign language of the Netherlands over two decades. Sign Language Studies, 3(4), 469–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simkins, Lawrence, & Rinck, Christine (1982). Male and female sexual vocabulary in different interpersonal contexts. The Journal of Sex Research, 18(2), 160–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siu, Wai Yan Rebecca (2016). Sociolinguistic variation in Hong Kong Sign Language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington.Google Scholar
Stamp, Rose, Schembri, Adam, Fenlon, Jordan, Rentelis, Ramas, Woll, Bencie, & Cormier, Kearsy (2014). Lexical variation and change in British Sign Language. PLoS ONE, 9(4), e94053. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stamp, Rose, Schembri, Adam, Fenlon, Jordan, & Rentelis, Ramas (2015). Sociolinguistic variation and change in British Sign Language number signs: Evidence of leveling? Sign Language Studies, 15(2), 151–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sunderland, Jane (2006). Language and Gender: An advanced resource book. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sutton-Spence, Rachel, Woll, Bencie, & Allsop, Lorna (1990). Variation and recent change in fingerspelling in British Sign Language. Language Variation and Change, 2(3), 313–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sutton-Spence, Rachel, & Woll, Bencie (1999). The linguistics of British Sign Language: An introduction. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sze, Felix, Lo, Connie, Lo, Lisa, & Chu, Kenny (2013). Historical development of Hong Kong Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 13(2), 155–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sze, Felix, Chu, Kenny, Lo, Connie, & Lo, Lisa (2012). Lexical variation and diachronic change in Hong Kong Sign Language: Preliminary observations. Paper presented at the New Ways of Analyzing Variation in Asia Pacific 2, NINJAL, Tokyo.
Sze, Felix, Woodward, James, Suwiryo, Adhika Irlang, Wijaya, Laura Lesmana, & Satryawan, Iwan (2012). Sign language use and variation in Jakarta Sign Language. Paper presented at the New Ways of Analyzing Variation in Asia Pacific 2, NINJAL, Tokyo.
Sze, Felix, Wei, Monica Xiao, & Wong, Aaron Yiu Leung (2017). Taboos and euphemisms in sex-related signs in Asian sign languages. Linguistics, 55(1), 153–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tang, Gladys (Ed.). (2007). Hong Kong Sign Language: A trilingual dictionary with linguistic descriptions. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
(1999). Sex expressions in sign language culture. Paper presented at the Love and Sexuality Conference, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Trudgill, Peter (1972). Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society, 1(2), 179–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanhecke, Eline & De Weerdt, Kristof (2004). Regional variation in Flemish Sign Language. In M. Van Herreweghe & M. Vermeerbergen (Eds.), To the lexicon and beyond: Sociolinguistics in European deaf communities (pp. 27–38). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Warren, Beatrice (1992). What euphemisms tell us about the interpretation of words. Studia Linguistica, 46(2), 128–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watt, Dominic (2002). “I Don’t speak with a Geordie accent, I speak, like, the Northern accent”: Contact-induced leveling in the Tyneside vowel system. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6(1), 44–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William, & Herzog, Marvin (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (Eds.), Direction for historical linguistics: A symposium (pp. 95–188). Austin: TXL University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Margaret, & Emmorey, Karen (2000). When does modality matter? Evidence from ASL on the nature of working memory. In Karen Emmorey & Harlan Lane (Eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima (pp. 135–142). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Woodward, James (1979). Signs of sexual behavior: an introduction to some sex-related vocabulary in American Sign Language. Silver Spring, Md: T.J. Publishers.Google Scholar
Woodward, James, Erting, Carol, & Oliver, Susanna (1976). Facing and hand(l)ing variation in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 101, 43–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwitserlood, Inge (2012). Classifiers. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach, & Bencie Woll (Eds.), Sign language: An international handbook (pp. 158–186). Berlin; Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Palfreyman, Nick
2020. Macro and micro-social variation in Asia-Pacific sign languages. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 6:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.