Cover not available
Article published In:
Regional Chinese in Contact
Edited by James A. Walker
[Asia-Pacific Language Variation 5:1] 2019
► pp. 9–27

On intergenerational differences in code-switching among Cantonese people

| South China University of Technology | La Trobe University
As part of a Chinese government project to document and protect the country’s language resources, this research examines variation in Cantonese spoken in the city of Guangzhou. Over 100 speakers were recorded and the 44 hours of natural discourse were searched for occurrences of code-switching (CS) between Cantonese and Mandarin (C-M) or English (C-E). This paper describes the differences between age-groups in terms of the distribution of different types of CS and its communicative functions. More frequent CS is observed among younger people due to increasing degrees of language contact with Mandarin and English, challenging the maintenance of Cantonese in younger generations.
Keywords: Cantonese, language change, code-switching, language variation and change, language transmission
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Code-switching
  • 3.Language situation in Guangzhou (Canton) and research questions
  • 4.Methodology
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Distribution by age-group
    • 5.2The functions of CS
      • A.Ease of expression
      • B.Articulateness and simplicity
      • C.Softening effect
      • D.Topic shift
      • E.Turn accommodation
      • F.Style shifting
  • 6.Speaker awareness of CS
  • 7.Intergenerational code shift
  • 8.Discussion
  • 9.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aplv.18008.sha
References (28)
References
Appel, René, & Muysken, Pieter (1987). Language contact and bilingualism. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter (Ed.). (1998). Code-switching in conversation: Language, interaction and identity. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Azuma, Shoji (1998). Meaning and form in codeswitching. In Rodolfo Jacobson (Ed.), Codeswitching worldwide (pp. 109–124). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baetens Beardsmore, Hugo (1986). Bilingualism: Basic principles (2nd edition). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Chen, Hoi Ying (2008). Bilinguals in style: Linguistic practices and ideologies of Cantonese- English codemixers in Hong Kong. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael (1991). Community languages: The Australian experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giles, Howard, & Ryan, Ellen Bouchard (1982). Prolegomena for developing a social psychological theory of language attitudes. In Ellen Bouchard Ryan & Howard Giles (Ed.), Attitudes towards language variation: Social and applied contexts (pp. 208–223). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
He, Ziran, & Yu, Guodong (2001). Researches on Codeswitching. Modern Foreign Languages, 24(1), 85–95.Google Scholar
Heller, Monica (1982). Negotiations of language choice in Montréal. In John J. Gumperz (Ed.), Language and social identity (pp. 108–118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jie, Xiaoping (2017). A case study of code-switching in a city of east China. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 4(1), 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamwangamalu, Nkonko Mudipanu (1992). Mixers and mixing English across cultures. World Englishes, 11(2/3), 173–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, David (1996). Issues in bilingualism and biculturalism: a Hong Kong case study. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
(2000). Cantonese-English code-switching research in Hong Kong: A Y2K review. World Englishes, 19(3), 305–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luke, Kangkwong, & Zhang, Zhenjiang (2003). The change tendency of the languages in Guangdong in the past 50 years. Sociolinguistic Research in China, 11, 125–133.Google Scholar
Luke, Kangkwong (1984). Expedient and orientational language mixing in Hong Kong. York Papers in Linguistics, 111, 191–201.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter (1995). Code-switching and grammatical theory. In Lesley Milroy & Pieter Muysken (Ed.), One speaker, two languages: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on code-switching (pp. 177–198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol (1993). Social motivations for code-switching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2001). Code-switching. In Florian Coulmas (Ed.), The handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 217–237). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana (1980). Sometimes I’ll start a sentence in Spanish y termino en español: Toward a typology of code-switching. Linguistics, 181, 581–618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reyes, Iliana (2004). Functions of code switching in schoolchildren’s conversations. Bilingual Research Journal, 28(1), 77–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne (1995). Bilingualism. (2nd edition). Oxford/Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shan, Yunming, & Li, Sheng (2018). Language attitudes of Guangzhou people and inheritance of Cantonese identity. Chinese Journal of Language Policy and Planning, 3(3), 33–41.Google Scholar
Tsz, Emily Yanfong (2010). Changing intergroup relations with mainland Chinese: An analysis of changes in Hong Kong movies as a popular cultural discourse. Multilingua, 29(1), 29–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef (1999). Understanding pragmatics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Wardhaugh, Ronald (2000). An introduction to sociolinguistics. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar
Wu, Yian (1985). Code-mixing by English-Chinese bilingual teachers of the People’s Republic of China. World Englishes, 4(3), 303–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhan, Bohui (2002). An outline of Yue dialects in Guangdong. Guangzhou, China: Jinan University Press.Google Scholar
Zheng, Dingou (1998). Language variation – Comparison between Cantonese in Hong Kong and in Guangzhou. Zhongguo Yuwen, 11, 56–65.Google Scholar