Cover not available
Article published In:
Asia-Pacific Language Variation
Vol. 2:2 (2016) ► pp.124–156

Variation and change in Toronto heritage Cantonese

An analysis of two monophthongs across two generations

| University of Pittsburgh
This paper presents the first sociophonetic study of Cantonese vowels using sociolinguistic interview data from the Heritage Language Variation and Change in Toronto Corpus. It focuses on four allophones [iː], [ɪk/ɪŋ], [uː], and [ʊk/ʊŋ] of two contrastive vowels /iː/ and /uː/ across two generations of speakers. The F1 and F2 of 30 vowel tokens were analyzed for these four allophones from each of 20 speakers (N = 600 vowel tokens). Results show inter-generational maintenance of allophonic conditioning for /iː/ and /uː/ as well as an interaction between generation and sex such that second-generation female speakers have the most retracted variants of [ɪk/ɪŋ] and the most fronted variants of [iː]. This paper will discuss three possible explanations based on internal motivation, phonetic assimilation, and phonological influence. This will illustrate the importance of multiple comparisons (including inter-generational, cross-linguistic, and cross-community) in the relatively new field of heritage language phonology research.
Keywords: heritage languages, bilingualism, sociophonetics, contact linguistics, Cantonese/Chinese language–Canada
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Heritage language phonology research
    • 2.2Socio-historical background
    • 2.3The Cantonese vowel system
  • 3.Research questions and hypotheses
    • 3.1Research questions
    • 3.2Hypotheses
      • 3.2.1Internal motivation
      • 3.2.2TOENG influence through phonetic assimilation
      • 3.2.3TOENG phonological influence
  • 4.Data
  • 5.Method
    • 5.1Overview
    • 5.2Procedure
    • 5.3Normalization and subsequent steps
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1Overall results
    • 6.2Results for individual vowels
      • 6.2.1The vowel /iː/
      • 6.2.2The vowel /uː/
  • 7.Discussion
    • 7.1Maintenance of allophonic conditioning
    • 7.2External factors
    • 7.3Accounting for variation
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 April 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aplv.2.2.02tse
References (34)
References
Bauer, Robert S., & Benedict, Paul K. (1997). Modern Cantonese phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Robert S., Cheung, Kwan-hin, & Cheung, Pak-man (2003). Variation and merger of the rising tones in Hong Kong Cantonese. Language Variation and Change, 15(2), 211–225.
Boersma, Paul, & Weenink, David (2014). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.4.02) [Computer program]. Retrieved December 14, 2014 from [URL]
Chang, Charles B., Yao, Yao, Haynes, Erin F., & Rhodes, Russell (2011). Production of phonetic and phonological contrast by heritage speakers of Mandarin. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(6), 3964–3980. DOI logo
Clarke, Sandra, Elms, Ford, & Youssef, Amani (1995). The third dialect of English: Some Canadian evidence. Language Variation and Change, 7(2), 209–228. DOI logo
Godson, Linda (2004). Vowel production in the speech of western Armenian heritage speakers. Heritage Language Journal, 2(1), 1–26.
Hoffman, Michol F. (2010). The role of social factors in the Canadian vowel shift: Evidence from Toronto. American Speech, 85(2), 121–140. DOI logo
Hoffman, Michol F., & Walker, James A. (2010). Ethnolects and the city: Ethnic orientation and linguistic variation in Toronto English. Language Variation and Change, 22(1), 37–67. DOI logo
Hsu, Madeline Y. (2000). Dreaming of gold, dreaming of home: Transnationalism and migration between the United States and South China, 1882–1943. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel E. (2009). Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 359–383.
Kang, Yoonjung, & Nagy, Naomi (2012). VOT merger in heritage Korean in Toronto. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Linguistic Association. Available from [URL]
Labov, William (1994). Principles of linguistic change, volume 1: Internal factors. Oxford, UK; Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, & Boberg, Charles (2006). The atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology and sound change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lau, Chun-fat (2003). Labovian principles of vowel shifting revisited: The short vowel shift in New Zealand English and Southern Chinese. In Barry J. Blake & Kate Burridge (Eds.), Historical Linguistics 2001: Selected Papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Melbourne, 13–17 August 2001 (pp. 293–301). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Thomas (1983). The vowel system in two varieties of Cantonese. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 571, 97–114.
Li, Peter S. (2005). The rise and fall of Chinese immigration to Canada: Newcomers from Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China and mainland China, 1980–2000. International Migration, 431(3), 9–32.
Man, Evelyn Y. (2006). First language use and language behavior of Chinese students in Toronto, Canada. In Kimi Kondo-Brown (Ed.), Heritage language development: Focus on East Asian immigrants (pp. 209–241). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Stephen, & Yip, Virginia (2011). Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mok, Peggy K., Zuo, Donghui, & Wong, Peggy W. Y. (2013). Production and perception of a sound change in progress: Tone merging in Hong Kong Cantonese. Language Variation and Change, 25(3), 341–370.
Montrul, Silvina A. (2008). Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism: Re-examining the age factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagy, Naomi (2011). A multilingual corpus to explore variation in language contact situations. Rassegna Italiana Di Linguistica Applicata, 43(1–2), 65–84.
Polinsky, Maria (2011). Heritage languages. In Mark Aronoff (Ed.), Oxford bibliographies in linguistics [online resource]. DOI logo
Polinsky, Maria, & Kagan, Olga (2007). Heritage languages: In the “Wild” and in the classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(5), 368–395. DOI logo
Roeder, Rebecca, & Jarmasz, Lidia-Gabriela (2010). The Canadian shift in Toronto. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 55(3), 387–404. DOI logo
Ronquest, Rebecca E. (2013). An acoustic examination of unstressed vowel reduction in Heritage Spanish. In Chad Howe, Sarah E. Blackwell, & Margaret Lubbers Quesada (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 15th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 157–171). Available from [URL]
Siemiatycki, Myer, Rees, Tim, Ng, Roxana, & Rahi, Khan (2003). Integrating community diversity in Toronto: On whose terms? In Paul Anisef & C. Michael Lanphier (Eds.), The world in a city (pp. 373–456). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sloetjes, Han, & Wittenburg, Peter (2008). Annotation by category – ELAN and ISO DCR. In Proceedings of the sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008), 816–820. Available from [URL]
Statistics Canada (2012). Visual Census 2011, Ottawa. Retrieved January 1, 2015, from [URL]
Stevens, Kenneth N., & House, Arthur S. (1963). Perturbation of vowel articulations by consonantal context: An acoustical study. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 6(2), 111–128.
Taylor, Bill (2007, December 30). The language quilt: From irregular stitching, an ongoing work of art. The Toronto Star, p. ID06.
Thomas, Erik, & Kendall, Tyler (2007). NORM: The vowel normalization and plotting suite (Version 1.1) [Computer program]. Retrieved December 14, 2014 from [URL]
Thompson, Richard H. (1989). Toronto’s Chinatown: The changing social organization of an ethnic community. New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar
Yue-Hashimoto, Oi-kan (1972). Phonology of Cantonese. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zee, Eric (2003). Frequency analysis of the vowels in Cantonese from 50 male and 50 female speakers. In M. J. Solé, D. Recasens, & J. Romero (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1117–1120). Available from [URL]
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Nagy, Naomi, Holman Tse & James N. Stanford
2024. Have Cantonese Tones Merged in Spontaneous Speech?. In The Phonetics and Phonology of Heritage Languages, ► pp. 302 ff. DOI logo
Repiso-Puigdelliura, Gemma
2024. Glottalizing at word junctures: Exploring bidirectional transfer in child and adult Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 27:3 ► pp. 350 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Huangmei & Dafydd Gibbon
2022. Effects of Familiarity and Dialect Experience on the Description of Tonal Variant. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Chang, Charles B.
2021. Phonetics and Phonology of Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 581 ff. DOI logo
Kan, Rachel T. Y.
2021. Phonological Production in Young Speakers of Cantonese as a Heritage Language. Language and Speech 64:1 ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Nagy, Naomi
2021. Heritage Languages in Canada. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 178 ff. DOI logo
Kan, Rachel T.Y. & Monika S. Schmid
2019. Development of tonal discrimination in young heritage speakers of Cantonese. Journal of Phonetics 73 ► pp. 40 ff. DOI logo
Tse, Holman
2019. Vowel shifts in Cantonese?. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 5:1 ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Grammatical Aspects of Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 579 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Heritage Languages around the World. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.