Going beyond the signal
Strategies in comprehension
References (13)
References
Abrams, K. and Bever, T.G. (1969), “Syntactic structure modifies attention during Speech Perception and Recognition” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21(3), pp. 280–290.
Bever, T.G. (1970), “The Cognitive Basis for Linguistic Structures” in J.R. Hayes (ed.). Cognition and the Development of Language, New York; John Wiley and Sons; Inc.
Broadbent, D.E. (1968), “Applications of Information Theory and Decision Theory to Human Perception and Reactions” in R.N. Haber (ed.), Contemporary Theory and Research in Visual Perception, New York; Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Bruce, D.J. (1958), “The Effect of Listeners’ Anticipation on the Intelligibility of Heard Speech”, Language and Speech, 11, pp. 79–96.
Clay, M.M. and Imlach, R.H. (1971), “Juncture, Pitch and Stress as Reading Behaviour Variables”, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 101, pp. 133–139.
Fillenbaum, S. (1974), “Information Amplified: Memory for Counterfactual Conditionals”, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1021, pp. 44–49.
Fillenbaum, S. (1973), Syntactic Factors in Memory?, The Hague; Mouton.
Lashley, K.S. (1951), “The Problem of serial order in behavior”, in L.A. Jeffress (ed.), Cerebral Mechanisms in Behaviour, New York; Wiley; pp. 112–136.
Oller Jnr. J.W. and Tullius, J.R. (1973), “Reading skills of non-native speakers of English”, IRAL, Xl/1, pp. 69–80.
Schlesinger, I.M. (1968), Sentence Structure and the Reading Process, The Hague; Mouton.
Spolsky, B., Sigurd, B., Sato, M., Walker, E. and Arterburn, C. (1968), “Preliminary Studies in the development of techniques for testing overall second language proficiency”. Language Learning, Special issue. No. 3, pp. 79–98.
Swets, J.A., Tanner, Jnr., W.P. and Birdsall, T.G. (1964), “Decision Processes in Perception”, in J.A. Swets (ed.), Signal Detection and Recognition by Human Observers, New York; John Wiley and Sons, Inc., pp. 3–57.
Sachs, J. (1967), “Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse”. Perception and Psychophysics, Vol. 2(9), pp. 437–442.