Cover not available
Article published In:
Australian Applied Language Studies
Edited by Tim F. McNamara
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 10:2] 1987
► pp. 83–113

Determining the influence of instruction on L2 speech processing

| University of Sydney

In this article it is claimed that there is a set of universal speech processing constraints which applies to all types of second language acquisition. These constraints define the range of possible hypotheses about the structure of the L2 which a learner can create at a given stage of development and cannot be overridden by formal instruction or by other alterations in the linguistic input.

These claims, however, do not imply that all types of language acquisition are identical or that teaching has no influence whatsoever on the way a second language develops in a formal context. It has been shown elsewhere (cf. Pienemann, 1984, 1985, 1987a) that under certain conditions teaching can influence formal L2 development. These demonstrable positive effects of teaching, however, remain inside the variational margin left open by the processing constraints.

The present paper reports on the interlanguage development of one learner of German as a second language, selected from a broader longitudinal study of one year’s duration. It was found that the learner’s word order development was identical to the natural development of German as a second language despite the progression intended in the teaching. A similar result was obtained in the development of verbal morphology. It is also shown that agreement marking is acquired at the same time as specific word order rules.

Published online: 1 January 1987
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.10.2.07pie
References
Bausch, K. R. and F. Koenigs
(1983) Lernt oder erwirbt man Fremdsprachen im Unterricht? Die Neueren Sprachen 12,4:308–336.Google Scholar
Butzkamm, W.
(1973) Aufgeklärte Einsprachlgkeit: zur Entdogmatlsierung der Methode im Fremdsprachenunterricht. Heidelberg, Quelle und Meyer.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H.
(1980) Psycholinguistic aspects of L2 acquisition: word order phenomena in foreign workers’ interlanguage. In S. Felix (ed.) Second language development: trends and issues. Tübingen, Gunter Narr Verlag: 57–80.Google Scholar
(1984) The acquisition of German word order: a test case for cognitive approaches to L2 development. In R. W. Andersen (ed.) Second languages: a cross-linguistic perspective. Rowley, Mass., Newbury House: 219–242.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., J. Meisel and M. Pienemann
(1983) Deutsch als Zweitsprache: der Spracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiter. Tübingen, Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(1984) Can syntax be taught? a study of the effects of formal instruction on the acquisition of WH questions in children. Applied Linguistics 5,2:138–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Felix, S.
(1981) The effect of formal instruction on second language acquisition. Language Learning 31,1:87–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O.
(1904) Hov to teach a foreign language. London, Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. M.
(1975) On process models of sentence analysis. In D. A. Norman and D. E. Rumelhart (eds.) Explorations in cognition. San Francisco, Freeman: 117–135.Google Scholar
Leont’ev A. A.
(1975) Psychollnguistlscbe Einheiten und die Erzeugung spracblicber Äußerungen. Translated into German by F. Juttner. Berlin, Akademie-Verlag. (Original Russian edition 1969).Google Scholar
Llghtbown, P. M.
(1983) Exploring relationships between developmental and instructional sequences. In H. W. Seliger and M. H. Long (eds.) Classroom-oriented research on second language acquisition. Rowley, Mass., Newbury House: 217–245.Google Scholar
Melsel, J.
(1983) Strategies of second language acquisition: more than one kind of simplification! In R. W. Andersen (ed.) Pldginlzation and creollzatlon as language acquisition. Rowley Mass., Newbury House: 120–157.Google Scholar
Meisel, J., H. Clahsen and M. Pienemann
(1981) On determining developmental stages in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3,2:109–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Netschajeff, A.
(1908) Psychologische Betrachtungen zur Frage über den fremdländischen Unterricht. Pädagogisch-psychologische Studien 91:1–6.Google Scholar
Otto, E.
(1921) Methodik und Didaktik des neusprachllchen Unterrichts: Versuoh elner wlssenschaftlichen Unterrichtslehre. Bielefeld, Yelhagen und Klasing.Google Scholar
Peterson, H. A.
(1903) Recall of words, objects, and movements. In H. Munsterberg (ed.) Harvard Psychological Studies Vol. 11. New York: 207–233.Google Scholar
Piaget, J.
(1950) The psychology of Intelligence. Translated by M. Piercy and D. E. Berlyne. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Original French edition 1947).Google Scholar
Pica, T.
(1983) Adult acquisition of English as a second language under different conditions of exposure. Language Learning 33, 4:465–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(1980) The second language acquisition of immigrant children. In S. Felix (ed.) Second language development: trends and Issues. Tübingen, Gunter Narr Verlag: 41–56.Google Scholar
(1981) Der Zweitspracherwerb ausländlscher Arbeiterklnder. Bonn, Bouvier.Google Scholar
(1984) Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6,2:186–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1985) Learnability and syllabus construction. In K. Hyltenstam and M. Pienemann (eds.) Modelling and assessing second language development. Clevedon, Avon, Multilingual Matters: 23–75.Google Scholar
(1987a) Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Australian Working Papers in Language Development 1,3:1–41.Google Scholar
(1987b) Analyzing language acquisition data with a microcomputer: COLIAN. MS, University of Sydney and Universitat Duisburg.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. and M. Johnston
(1985) Towards an explanatory model of language acquisition. Paper presented at the 1985 Los Angeles Second Language Research Forum, UCLA, February 22–24.
(1986) An acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 9,1:92–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1987) A predictive framework of second language acquisition. MS, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Rotman, B.
(1977) Jean Plaget: psychologist of the real. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Scherer, G. A. C. and M. Wertheimer
(1964) A psycholinguistic experiment in foreign language teaching. New York, McGraw Hill Book Co.Google Scholar
Solmecke, G.
(1983) Foreign language teaching: the state of the art. In S. W. Felix and H. Wode (eds.) Language development at the crossroads. Tübingen, Gunter Narr Verlag: 137–144.Google Scholar
Swenson, L. C.
(1980) Theories of learning. Traditional perspectives/contemporary developments. Belmont, CA, Wadswortb Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Wienold, G.
(1973) Die Erlernbarkeit der Sprachen. München, Kösel Verlag.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D. A.
(1976) Notional syllabuses: a taxonomy and its relevance for foreign language curriculum development. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wode, H.
(1981) Language-acquisition universals: a unified view of language acquisition. In M. WInitz (ed.) Native language and foreign language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 3791:218–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zobl, H.
(1985) Grammars in search of input and intake. In S. Gass and C. Madden (eds.) Input and second language acquisition. Rowley, Mass., Newbury House: 329–344.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 18 other publications

Baten, Kristof
2011. Processability Theory and German Case Acquisition. Language Learning 61:2 ► pp. 455 ff. DOI logo
Bonilla, Carrie L.
2015. Chapter 10. Instructing Stages of Processability Theory in L2 Spanish. In Theoretical and Methodological Developments in Processability Theory [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 4], ► pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Boss, Bettina
2008. Exploring the acquisition of German verb morphology by instructed learners. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 31:2 ► pp. 14.1 ff. DOI logo
Boss, Bettina
2008. Exploring the acquisition of German verb morphology by instructed learners. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 31:2 ► pp. 14.1 ff. DOI logo
Dyson, Bronwen Patricia
1996. The debate on form-focused instruction. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Eubank, Lynn
1993. Sentence matching and processing in L2 development. Second Language Research 9:3 ► pp. 253 ff. DOI logo
Gozdawa-Gołębiowski, Romuald
2013. Basic Dichotomies in Foreign Language Teaching and Learning: A Case of Formulaic Language. In Investigations in Teaching and Learning Languages [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Hulstijn, Jan H., Richard F. Young, Lourdes Ortega, Martha Bigelow, Robert DeKeyser, Nick C. Ellis, James P. Lantolf, Alison Mackey & Steven Talmy
2014. BRIDGING THE GAP. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36:3 ► pp. 361 ff. DOI logo
Lantolf, James P. & Xian Zhang
2015. Response to Pienemann's Critique of Zhang and Lantolf (2015). Language Learning 65:3 ► pp. 752 ff. DOI logo
Lightbown, Patsy M. & Nina Spada
1990. Focus-on-Form and Corrective Feedback in Communicative Language Teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12:4 ► pp. 429 ff. DOI logo
MASUDA, KYOKO
2006. Applied Cognitive Linguistics: The State of the Art and New Directions (M. Achard and S. Niemeier (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition, and Foreign Language Teaching). ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 23:2 ► pp. 534 ff. DOI logo
Pienemann, Manfred
2015. An Outline of Processability Theory and Its Relationship to Other Approaches to SLA. Language Learning 65:1 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Pienemann, Manfred & Malcolm Johnston
1996. A brief history of processing approaches to SLA: reply to Mellow. Second Language Research 12:3 ► pp. 319 ff. DOI logo
Pienemann, Manfred, Malcolm Johnston & Geoff Brindley
1988. Constructing an Acquisition-Based Procedure for Second Language Assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10:2 ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Tammenga-Helmantel, Marjon & Minna Maijala
2018. Sequences in German grammar teaching: An analysis of Dutch, Finnish, and global textbooks. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 56:1 ► pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
TSCHIRNER, ERWIN
1996. Scope and Sequence: Rethinking Beginning Foreign Language Instruction. The Modern Language Journal 80:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Xian & James P. Lantolf
2015. Natural or Artificial: Is the Route of L2 Development Teachable?. Language Learning 65:1 ► pp. 152 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2017. Understanding Second Language Processing [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 4], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.