Cover not available
Article published In:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 17:2 (1994) ► pp.104–120

What should we teach about the spoken language?

| University of Nottingham, UK
This paper sets out to address the problem of just what, from the vast amount of research now available into the spoken language, can and ought to form part of the oral component of a second or foreign language course. Exemplification is principally based on spoken English from the British Isles, but reference is made, where appropriate, to other modern languages. Structural, interactive, generic and contextual constraints are discussed in terms of their implications for teaching, and a core set of features are highlighted. Some results of discourse analysis and conversation analysis are argued as better treated within the domain of cross-cultural studies, and other features of spoken language usually considered within the domain of discourse analysis are proposed for inclusion within the lexico-grammatical areas of the syllabus. Methodological implications are discussed in the final section, where it is argued that traditional ‘presentational’ approaches to language teaching need to be rethought and supplemented by more inductive- and language awareness based activities.
Published online: 1 January 1994
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.17.2.05mcc
References (32)
References
Aijmer, K. (1989) Themes and tails: the discourse function of dislocated elements. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 12,2: 137–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradford, B. (1988) Intonation in context (student’s and teacher’s book). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brazil, D.C. (1985) The communicative value of intonation in English. Birmingham, English Language Research, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Brown, P. and S. Levinson (1987) Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duranti, A. (1991) Four properties of speech-in-interaction. In J. Verschueren (ed.) Pragmatics at issue. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duranti, A. and E. Ochs (1979) Left dislocation in Italian conversation. In T. Givón (ed.) Syntax and semantics. Volume 121 Discourse and syntax. New York, Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, W., J. House, G. Kasper and B. Stemmer (1984) Learning the pragmatics of discourse: a project report. Applied Linguistics 5,2:113–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, B. (1990) An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics 141:383–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guitart, J.M. (1989) On Spanish cleft sentences. In C. Kirschner and J. Decesaris Studies in Romance linguistics. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoey, M.P. (1991) Some properties of spoken discourse. In R. Bowers and C. Brumfit (eds) Applied linguistics and English language teaching. Basingstoke, Macmillan/MEP.Google Scholar
Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. (1991) Opening sequences in Dutch telephone conversations. In D. Boden and D. Zimmerman (eds) Talk and social structure. Oxford, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hong, B. (1985) Politeness in Chinese: impersonal pronouns and personal greetings. Anthropological Linguistics 27,2:204–13.Google Scholar
Kallgren, G. and E.F. Prince (1989) Swedish VP-topicalisation and Yiddish verb-topicalisation. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 121:47–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1972) Language in the inner City. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K. (1988) Presentational cleft constructions in spoken French. In J. Haiman and S. Thompson (eds) Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lebra, T.S. (1987) The cultural significance of silence in Japanese. Multilingua 6,4:343–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. (1993) The lexical approach: the state of ELT and a way forward. Hove, UK, LTP.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M.J. (1991) Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M.J. and R.A. Carter (1994) Language as discourse: perspectives for language teaching. London, Longman.Google Scholar
Nattinger, J. R. and J. S. DeCarrico. (1992) Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Noguchi, R.R. (1987) The dynamics of rule conflict in English and Japanese conversation. International Review of Applied Linguistics 25,1:15–24.Google Scholar
Ono, T. and R. Suzuki (1992) Word order variability in Japanese conversation: motivations and grammaticalization. Text 12,3:429–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., E.A. Schegloff and G. Jefferson (1974) A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50,4:696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scarcella, R. (1983) Developmental trends in the acquisition of conversational competence by adult second language learners. In N. Wolfson and E. Judd (eds) Sociolinguistics and language acquisition. Rowley Mass, Newbury House.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.A. and H. Sacks (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica8,4:289–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sifianou, M. (1989) On the telephone again. Differences in telephone behaviour: England versus Greece. Language in Society 18,4:527–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.McH. and R.M. Coulthard (1975) Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swan, M. (1980/1994) Practical English usage. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Testa, R. (1988) Interruptive strategies in English and Italian conversation: smooth versus contrastive linguistic preferences. Multilingua 7,3:285–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A.E., A.A. Jeffries and C.E. Davies (1988) The effect of discourse structuring devices on listener perceptions of coherence in non-native university teachers’ spoken discourse. World Englishes 7,2:101–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, R.J. (1989) Taking the pitcher to the ‘well’: native speakers’ perception of their use of discourse markers in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 131:203–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Szczyrbak, Magdalena
2019. But, you see, the problem is …Perception verbs in courtroom talk: Focus onyou see. Topics in Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 24 ff. DOI logo
Hale, Sandra
1999. Interpreters' treatment of discourse markers in courtroom questions. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 6:1 ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Hanamura, Naoko
1998. Teaching telephone closings in Japanese. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. Series S 15 ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Crozet, Chantal
1996. Teaching verbal interaction and culture in the language classroom. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.