Article published in:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 18:2 (1995) ► pp. 85104
Coulter, J.
(1990) Elementary properties of argument sequences. In G. Psathas (ed.) Interaction competence. Lanham, University of America Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, R.
(ed) (1995) Spoken interaction studies in Australia. (ARAL Series N° 12) Canberra, ALAA.Google Scholar
Goffman, E.
(1971) Relations in public. Microstudies of the public order. New York, Harper and Rowe.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. and M. Goodwin
(1990) Interstitial argument. In A.D. Grimshaw (ed.) Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grootendorst, R.
(1990) Everyday argumentation from a speech act perspective. Communication and Cognition 24,1: 111–134.Google Scholar
Jackson, S. and S. Jacobs
(1980) Structure of conversational argumentation: Pragmatic bases for the enthymeme. Quarterly Journal of Speech 66: 251–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1982) Conversational argumentation: A discourse analytic approach. In J.R. Cox and C.A. Willard (eds) Advances in Argumentation Research. Carbondale, Ill, Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, S.
(1987) The management of disagreement in conversation. In F.H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C.A. Willard (eds).Google Scholar
(1989) Speech acts and arguments. Argumentation 3: 345–365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G.
(1984) Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgement tokens ‘yeah’ and ‘mm hm’. Papers in Linguistics 17, 2, 197–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Legge, N.J.
(1988) The management of interpersonal disputes within friendships: An analysis of discursive practices. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Liddicoat, A.J., S. Döpke, K. Love and A. Brown
(1994) Presenting a point of view: Callers’ contributions to talkback radio in Australia. Journal of Pragmatics. 22: 139–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J.
(1966) La langue et la pensée chez l’ enfant: Etudes sur la logique de l’ enfant. Neuchatel, Delachaux and Niestle.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A.
(1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of social action: Studies in conversational analysis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, H.
(1987) On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button and J.R.E. Lee (eds) Talk and social organization. Clevedon, Multilingual MattersGoogle Scholar
(1992) Lectures on Conversation. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D.
(1984) Jewish argument as sociability. Language in Society 13: 311–335. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1985) Everyday argument: The organization of diversity in talk. In T.A. van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis vol. 3. London, Academic.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M.
(1983) Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tannen, D.
(1981) New York Jewish conversational style. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 30: 133–149.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S.E.
(1958) The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F.H. and R. Grootendorst
(1984) Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Dordrecht, Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1992) Argumentation, communication and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F.H. and T. Kruiger
(1987) Identifying argumentation schemes. In F.H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C.A. Willard (eds). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F.H., R. Grootendorst, J.A. Blair and C.A. Willard
(eds) (1987) Argumentation: Perspectives and Approaches. Dordrecht, Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F.H., R. Grootendorst, S. Jackson and S. Jacobs
(1993) Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa, University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Guerin, Bernard
2003. Language use as Social Strategy: A Review and an Analytic Framework for the Social Sciences. Review of General Psychology 7:3  pp. 251 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.