Cover not available
Article published In:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 43:1 (2020) ► pp.4–28

Changes to teachers’ knowledge base

Do they make a difference to students’ writing outcomes?

ORCID logo | University of Wollongong
| University of Wollongong
In China, since 2004, developing students’ overall communicative competence has become the central goal of the current College English Curriculum Requirements. However, this goal has yet to be addressed, particularly in regard to the teaching of writing. This paper examines whether and how changes in teachers’ knowledge base related to teaching writing may impact their students’ writing outcomes. Six experienced teachers were introduced to a SFL (Systemic Functional Linguistics)-informed genre approach and subsequently trialled this pedagogy in practice. Through pre- and post- workshop interviews and classroom observations, changes in teachers’ knowledge base were investigated. In each observed class, two writing samples produced by students were collected. The findings of changes in the teachers’ knowledge base were compared with possible changes emerging in their students’ writing products. The results of the comparison reveal that, corresponding to positive changes evidenced in the teachers’ knowledge base, the majority of the students made improvements in their writing products.
Keywords: knowledge, genre, pedagogy, curriculum, College English, second language writing
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Potential of SFL genre pedagogy in achieving the CECR goal
    • 1.2Teacher cognition and educational changes
  • 2.Methodology
    • 2.1Context
    • 2.2Participants
    • 2.3Workshop design
    • 2.4Data sources
    • 2.5Analytical framework
  • 3.Research findings
    • 3.1Teachers’ initial knowledge base of effective writing strategies
    • 3.2Changes in teachers’ knowledge base after training in SFL genre pedagogy
    • 3.3Changes in students’ writing outcomes after the intervention
  • 4.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 19 December 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.18025.shi
References (65)
References
Baker, A. (2011). ESL teachers and pronounciation pedagogy: Exploring the development of teachers’ cognitions and classroom practices. In J. Levis & K. LeVille (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd pronunciation in second language learning and teaching conference (pp. 82–94). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 31, 77–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burns, A. (2001). Genre-based approaches to writing and beginning adult ESL learners. In C. N. Candlin & N. Mercer (Eds.), English language teaching in its social context (pp. 200–207). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burns, A., & Knox, J. (2005). Realisation(s): Systemic-functional linguistics and the language classroom. In N. Bartels (Ed.), Researching applied linguistics in language teacher education (pp. 235–260). New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Callaghan, M., & Knapp, P. (1989). The discussion genre. Sydney: Metropolitan East DSP (Language and Social Power Project).Google Scholar
Callaghan, M., & Rothery, J. (1988). Teaching factual writing: A genre based approach. Sydney, N.S.W.: Metropolitan East Region.Google Scholar
Chaisiri, T. (2010a). Implementing a genre pedagogy to the teaching of writing in a university context in Thailand. Language Education in Asia, 11, 181–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010b). An investigation of the teaching of writing with a specific focus on the concept of genre. The International Journal of Learning, 17(2), 195–205.Google Scholar
Chappell, P. (2012). A sociocultural account of the role of imitation in instructed second language learning. JLLT, 3(1), 61–91.Google Scholar
(2014). Engaging learners: Conversations- or dialogic- driven pedagogy? ELT Journal, 68(1), 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christie, F., & Martin, J. R. (1997). Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Coffin, C. (1997). Constructing and giving value to the past: An investigation into secondary school history. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 196–230). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Derewianka, B. (1990). Exploring how texts work. Rozelle, N.S.W.: Primary English Association.Google Scholar
Derewianka, B., & Jones, P. (2012). Teaching language in context. South Melbourne, Vic.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, S., Humphrey, S., Mahboob, A., & Martin, J. R. (2016). Genre pedagogy in Higher Education: The SLATE project. UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Driel, J. H. V., Jong, O. D., & Verloop, N. (2001). The development of preservice chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Science Teacher Education, 861, 572–590. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emilia, E. (2005). A critical genre-based approach to teaching academic writing in a tertiary EFL context in Indonesia. (Unpublished PhD thesis). The University of Melbourne, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Fang, F. (2010). A discussion on developing students’ communicative competence in College English teaching in China. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(2), 111–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teacher College Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Boston, Mass; London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Gao, J. (2007). Teaching writing in Chinese universities: Finding an eclectic approach. Asian EFL Journal, 201. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Gao, J., & Huang, J. (2010). On communicative competence in curriculum design: A comparison of the College English Curriculum Requirements and the English Curriculum Standards. Polyglossia, 181, 73–86.Google Scholar
Gerami, M. R., & Noordin, N. B. (2013). Teacher cognition in foreign language vocabulary teaching: A study of Iranian high school EFL teachers. Theory and Pracitce in Language Studies, 3(9), 1531–1545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language (Exploration in language study). London: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P. (2005). Putting scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education. Prospect, 20(1), 6–30.Google Scholar
Humphrey, S., & Macnaught, L. (2011). Revisiting joint construction in the tertiary context. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 34(1), 99–115.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 121, 17–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 161, 148–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1972). On coummunicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). Penguin: Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Ji, L. (2009). Genre-based approach for teaching English factual writing. Humanising Language Teaching, 11(2). Retrieved from [URL]
Jin, L., Singh, M., & Li, L. (2005). Communicative language teaching in China: Misconceptions, applications and perceptions. Paper presented at the AARE’ 05 Education Research Conference “Creative Dissent: Constructive Solutions”. Parramatta, NSW. Retrieved from [URL]
Jin, Y. (2011). Fundamental concerns in high-stakes language testing: The case of the College English Test. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 71–83.Google Scholar
Kervin, L., Vialle, W., Herrington, J., & Okely, T. (2006). Research for educators. Australia: Ligare Book Printers.Google Scholar
Kongpetch, S. (2006). Using a genre-based approach to teach writing to Thai students: A case study. Prospect, 21(2), 3–33.Google Scholar
Krisnachinda, S. (2006). A case study of a genre-based approach to teaching writing in a tertiary context in Thailand. (Unpublished EdD thesis). University of Melbourne, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Liao, X. (1997). A brief introduction to the communicative language teaching. ERIC. Retrieved from [URL]
Martin, J. R. (1999). Mentoring semogenesis: ‘Genre-based’ literacy pedagogy. In C. Frances (Ed.), Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness: Linguistic and social process (pp. 123–155). London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2005). Genre relations: Mapping culture. Oakville, CT: Equinox Pub.Google Scholar
McCutchen, D., Abbott, R. D., Green, L. B., Beretvas, S. N., Cox, S., Potter, N. S., … Gray, A. L. (2002). Beginning literacy: Links among teacher knowledge, teacher practice, and student learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 351, 69–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. England: Clevedon, Avon.Google Scholar
Myskow, G., & Gordon, K. (2009). A focus on purpose: Using a genre approach in an EFL writing class. ELT Journal, 64(3), 283–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nezvalová, D. (2011). Researching science teacher pedagogical content knowledge. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 351, 104–118.Google Scholar
Orafi, S. M. S., & Borg, S. (2008). Intentions and realities in implementing communicative curriculum reform. System, 371, 243–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Painter, C. (1984). Into the mother tongue: A case study in early language development. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceputalisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 381, 261–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, D. (2007). Reading genre: A new wave of analysis. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 2 (1), 1–30.Google Scholar
Rozimela, Y. (2005). Genre-based pedagogy for teaching English academic writing in an Indonesian tertiary context: A case study. (Unpublished PhD thesis). The University of Melbourne, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Shi, L., Baker, A., & Chen, H. (2019). Chinese EFL teachers’ cognition about the effectiveness of genre pedagogy: A case study. RELC Journal: a journal of language teaching and research in Southeast Asia, 50(2), 314–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shi, L., Delahunty, J., & Gao, X. (2019). Constraints preventing Chinese EFL teachers from putting their stated beliefs into teaching practice. Professional Development in Education, 45(5), 774–789. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(7), 4–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siemon, A. (2010). Learning English in China: Is communicative language teaching a reality? Practically Primary, 15(2), 39–42.Google Scholar
Snow, D. (1996). More than a native speaker: An introduction for volunteers teaching abroad. Alexandra, Virginia: TESOL, Inc.Google Scholar
Tamir, P. (1991). Professional and personal knowledge of teachers and teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(3), 263–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsui, A. B. M. (2003). Understanding expertise in teaching: Case studies of ESL teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veel, R. (1997). Learning how to meaning – scientifically speaking: Apprenticeship into scientific discourse in the secondary school. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 161–195). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Voogt, J. M., Pieters, J. M., & Handelzalts, A. (2016). Teacher collaboration in curriculum design teams: Effects, mechanisms, and conditions. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(3–4), 121–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, W. (2008). Misunderstanding of communicative language teaching. English Language Teaching, 1(1), 50–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, L., & Gao, S. (2013). Beliefs and practices of Chinese university teachers in EFL writing instruction. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 26(2), 128–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y. (2016). Teaching Chinese College ESL writing: A genre-based approach. English Language Teaching, 9(9), 36–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
You, X. (2004). “The choice made from no choice”: English writing instruction in a Chinese university. Journal of Second Language Writing, 131, 97–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, B. (2011). A study on the role of teachers’ cognition in foreign language teaching. US-China Foreign Language, 9(7), 435–442.Google Scholar
Zhang, F., & Liu, Y. (2014). A study of secondary school English teachers’ beliefs in the context of curriculum reform in China. Language Teaching Research, 18(2), 187–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Oliver, Rhonda, Honglin Chen & Sender Dovchin
2024. Review of selected research in applied linguistics published in Australia (2015–2022). Language Teaching 57:3 ► pp. 341 ff. DOI logo
Brisk, María Estela, Zhongfeng Tian & Ed Ballard
2021. Autobiography writing instruction: The journey of a teacher participating in a systemic functional linguistics genre pedagogy professional development. System 97 ► pp. 102429 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.