Cover not available
Article published In:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 43:3 (2020) ► pp.277–301

Exploring the effects of web-based communication tasks on the development and transferability of audience awareness in L2 writers

ORCID logo | Nagoya City University
| Kinjo Gakuin University
| Rikkyo University
| Arizona State University
This article reports on two quasi-experimental studies that investigated the possible development and transfer of audience awareness in novice EFL writers as they engaged in online writing tasks through a Social Networking Service (SNS). Japanese students from two universities were asked to write, read, and comment on other students’ writing once a week. The two studies were arranged sequentially so as to capture in an exploratory but jointly illuminating manner whether and how the “elusive” (Hyland, 2005) construct of “sense of audience” can develop and transfer across genres. The results of both studies suggest that the SNS environment can help L2 writers develop audience awareness and transfer that awareness across genres when two conditions are met: (1) the genre of the SNS tasks should be perceived as similar to that for which transfer was expected; and (2) the students did not develop a sense of audience in previous writing instruction.
Keywords: audience awareness, SNS, learning transfer, argumentative writing
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Audience awareness: Operational definition
    • 1.2Transfer of learning across genres and media in second language learning
  • 2.Study 1
    • 2.1Study 1 – method
      • 2.1.1Context and participants
      • 2.1.2Pre- and post-SNS argumentative writing tasks
      • 2.1.3Impacts-of-SNS questionnaire
      • 2.1.4Transferability questionnaire
      • 2.1.5Procedure
    • 2.2Study 1 – results
    • 2.3Study 1 – discussion
  • 3.Study 2
    • 3.1Study 2 – method
      • 3.1.1Context and participants
      • 3.1.2Data and procedure
    • 3.2Study 2 – results
    • 3.3Study 2 – discussion
  • 4.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 20 February 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.18035.sas
References (29)
References
Baker, V., & Ota, H. (2011). Mixi diary versus Facebook photos: Social networking site use among Japanese and Caucasian American females. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 40(1), 39–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bitchener, J., Storch, N., & Wette, R. (Eds.). (2017). Teaching writing for academic purposes to multilingual students: Instructional approaches. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, J. C., & Brown, K. L. (2012). The effects of authentic audience on English as a second language (ESL) writers: A task-based, computer-mediated approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(5), 435–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cho, H. (2017). Synchronous web-based collaborative writing: Factors mediating interaction among second language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36(1), 37–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cresswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
DePalma, M., & Ringer, J. M. (2011). Toward a theory of adaptive transfer: Expanding disciplinary discussions of “transfer” in second-language writing and composition studies. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(2), 134–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2017). Writing with 21st century social tools in the L2 classroom: New literacies, genres, and writing practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36(1), 52–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. S. (2014). Teaching L2 composition: Purpose, process, and practice (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hafner, C. A. (2013). Digital composition in a second or foreign language. TESOL Quarterly, 47(4), 830–834. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. (2005). Representing readers in writing: Student and expert practices. Linguistics and Education, 16(4), 363–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
James, M. A. (2008). The influence of perceptions of task similarity/difference on learning transfer in second language writing. Written Communication, 25(1), 76–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role, and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Genre awareness for the novice academic student: An ongoing quest. Language Teaching, 41(1), 237–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, M., & Storch, N. (2017). Second language writing in the age of CMC: Affordances, multimodality, and collaboration. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36(1), 1–4. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Messick, S. (1992). Validity of test interpretation and use. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (6th ed.) (pp. 1487–1491). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Napierkowski, H. (2001, March). Collaborative learning and sense of audience in two computer-mediated discourse communities . Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Denver, CO.
Polio, C., & Friedman, D. A. (2017). Understanding, evaluating, and conducting second language writing research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rinnert, C., & Kobayashi, H. (2009). Situated writing practices in foreign language settings: The role of previous experience and instruction. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 23–48). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, M. (2002). Building an empirically-based model of EFL learners’ writing processes. In S. Ransdell & M-L. Barbier (Eds.), New directions for research in L2 writing (pp. 49–80). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Effects of varying lengths of study-abroad experiences on Japanese EFL students’ L2 writing ability and motivation: A longitudinal study. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 81–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, M., & Hirose, K. (1996). Explanatory variables for EFL students’ expository writing. Language Learning, 46(1), 137–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, M., Kozaki, Y., & Ross, S. J. (2017). The impact of normative environments on learner motivation and L2 reading ability growth. Modern Language Journal, 101(1), 163–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, M., Mizumoto, A., & Murakami, A. (2018). Developmental trajectories in L2 writing strategy use: A self-regulation perspective. Modern Language Journal, 102(2), 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tardy, C. M. (2017). The challenge of genre in the academic writing classroom: Implications for L2 writing teacher education. In J. Bitchener, N. Storch, & R. Wette (Eds.), Teaching writing for academic purposes to multilingual students: Instructional approaches (pp. 69–83). New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandommele, G., Van den Branden, K., Van Gorp, K., & De Maeyer, S. (2017). In-school and out-of-school multimodal writing as an L2 writing resource for beginner learners of Dutch. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36(1), 23–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D. (2007). Audience, authorship, and artifact: The emergent semiotics of Web 2. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 271, 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yashima, T., Zenuk-Nishide, L., & Shimizu, K. (2004). The influence of attitude and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning, 54(1), 119–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Kobayashi, Hiroe & Carol Rinnert
2023. Introduction. In Developing Multilingual Writing [Multilingual Education, 42], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Majidi, Abid el, Rick de Graaff & Daniel Janssen
2023. Debate pedagogy as a conducive environment for L2 argumentative essay writing. Language Teaching Research ► pp. 136216882311569 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.