Article published in:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 43:3 (2020) ► pp. 277–301

Exploring the effects of web-based communication tasks on the development and transferability of audience awareness in L2 writers

| Nagoya City University
| Kinjo Gakuin University
| Rikkyo University
| Arizona State University
This article reports on two quasi-experimental studies that investigated the possible development and transfer of audience awareness in novice EFL writers as they engaged in online writing tasks through a Social Networking Service (SNS). Japanese students from two universities were asked to write, read, and comment on other students’ writing once a week. The two studies were arranged sequentially so as to capture in an exploratory but jointly illuminating manner whether and how the “elusive” (Hyland, 2005) construct of “sense of audience” can develop and transfer across genres. The results of both studies suggest that the SNS environment can help L2 writers develop audience awareness and transfer that awareness across genres when two conditions are met: (1) the genre of the SNS tasks should be perceived as similar to that for which transfer was expected; and (2) the students did not develop a sense of audience in previous writing instruction.
Keywords: audience awareness, SNS, learning transfer, argumentative writing
Published online: 20 February 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.18035.sas
References

References

Baker, V., & Ota, H.
(2011) Mixi diary versus Facebook photos: Social networking site use among Japanese and Caucasian American females. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 40(1), 39–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bitchener, J., Storch, N., & Wette, R.
(Eds.) (2017) Teaching writing for academic purposes to multilingual students: Instructional approaches. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J. C., & Brown, K. L.
(2012) The effects of authentic audience on English as a second language (ESL) writers: A task-based, computer-mediated approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(5), 435–454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cho, H.
(2017) Synchronous web-based collaborative writing: Factors mediating interaction among second language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36(1), 37–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cresswell, J. W.
(2014) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
DePalma, M., & Ringer, J. M.
(2011) Toward a theory of adaptive transfer: Expanding disciplinary discussions of “transfer” in second-language writing and composition studies. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(2), 134–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z.
(2007) Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elola, I., & Oskoz, A.
(2017) Writing with 21st century social tools in the L2 classroom: New literacies, genres, and writing practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36(1), 52–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. S.
(2014) Teaching L2 composition: Purpose, process, and practice (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hafner, C. A.
(2013) Digital composition in a second or foreign language. TESOL Quarterly, 47(4), 830–834. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K.
(2005) Representing readers in writing: Student and expert practices. Linguistics and Education, 16(4), 363–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
James, M. A.
(2008) The influence of perceptions of task similarity/difference on learning transfer in second language writing. Written Communication, 25(1), 76–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johns, A. M.
(1997) Text, role, and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Genre awareness for the novice academic student: An ongoing quest. Language Teaching, 41(1), 237–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, M., & Storch, N.
(2017) Second language writing in the age of CMC: Affordances, multimodality, and collaboration. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36(1), 1–4. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Messick, S.
(1992) Validity of test interpretation and use. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (6th ed.) (pp. 1487–1491). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J.
(2014) Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Napierkowski, H.
(2001, March)  Collaborative learning and sense of audience in two computer-mediated discourse communities . Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Denver, CO.
Polio, C., & Friedman, D. A.
(2017) Understanding, evaluating, and conducting second language writing research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rinnert, C., & Kobayashi, H.
(2009) Situated writing practices in foreign language settings: The role of previous experience and instruction. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 23–48). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, M.
(2002) Building an empirically-based model of EFL learners’ writing processes. In S. Ransdell & M-L. Barbier (Eds.), New directions for research in L2 writing (pp. 49–80). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Effects of varying lengths of study-abroad experiences on Japanese EFL students’ L2 writing ability and motivation: A longitudinal study. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 81–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, M., & Hirose, K.
(1996) Explanatory variables for EFL students’ expository writing. Language Learning, 46(1), 137–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, M., Kozaki, Y., & Ross, S. J.
(2017) The impact of normative environments on learner motivation and L2 reading ability growth. Modern Language Journal, 101(1), 163–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, M., Mizumoto, A., & Murakami, A.
(2018) Developmental trajectories in L2 writing strategy use: A self-regulation perspective. Modern Language Journal, 102(2), 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tardy, C. M.
(2017) The challenge of genre in the academic writing classroom: Implications for L2 writing teacher education. In J. Bitchener, N. Storch, & R. Wette (Eds.), Teaching writing for academic purposes to multilingual students: Instructional approaches (pp. 69–83). New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vandommele, G., Van den Branden, K., Van Gorp, K., & De Maeyer, S.
(2017) In-school and out-of-school multimodal writing as an L2 writing resource for beginner learners of Dutch. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36(1), 23–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D.
(2007) Audience, authorship, and artifact: The emergent semiotics of Web 2. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yashima, T., Zenuk-Nishide, L., & Shimizu, K.
(2004) The influence of attitude and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning, 54(1), 119–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar