Writing for engineering
A comparison of student and industry texts
Professional engineers must move easily between concretization and abstraction in written communication, while
remaining rooted in the context of the particular engineering problem to be solved. Engineering programmes often seek to use a
replicated professional situation in order to prepare students for the workplace; however, there are questions as to how a
decontextualized task prepares students for the language and knowledge requirements of the field. This paper reports on the
findings of a Master’s research project, which investigated this issue through a comparison of two sets of engineering feasibility
studies: publicly available industry texts and English as an Additional Language (EAL) student texts from a Master’s engineering
program. The findings show that while the corpora have some similarities, there are differences that suggest that the student
texts are less bound to the concrete reality of their project, which has implications for those working in disciplinary and
professional literacies.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Methodology
- 3.Findings
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Conclusion
-
References
References (24)
References
Australian Education International (AEI). (2010). International graduate outcomes and employer perceptions. Canberra: AEI.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique (revised edition). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Pub Inc.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Community Energy for Goulburn (CE4G). (2016). A study into the feasibility of a community owned solar farm in Goulburn NSW. The Goulburn Group. Retrieved from [URL]
Engineers Australia. (2016). Stage 1 competency for professional engineers. Retrieved from [URL]
Gardner, S. (2012). Genres and registers of student report writing: An SFL perspective on texts and practices. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 111, 52–63. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodman, N., Muster, T., De Silva, K., Sanguansri, P., Hall, M., & Toze, S. (2014). Feasibility study for increasing water recycling at the Kellogg plant, Botany, NSW. Brisbane: Australian Water Recycling Centre of Excellence. Retrieved from [URL]
Gwilliams, L., & Fontaine, L. (2015). Indeterminacy in process type classification. Functional Linguistics, 2(8), 1–19. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Edward Arnold. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hanifan, R. (2014). Concise dictionary of engineering: A guide to the language of engineering. Switzerland: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hao, J. (2015). Construing Biology: An ideational perspective (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Hionis, D., Cornish, S., Trezise, F., & Murphy, R. (2015). Moonambel water supply feasibility study. MWH, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from [URL]
Luzon, M. J. (2005). Genre analysis in technical communication. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48(3), 285–295. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maton, K. (2014). Knowledge and knowers: Towards a realist sociology of education. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maton, K. (2016). Building knowledge about knowledge building. In K. Maton, S. Hood, & S. Shay (Eds.), Knowledge-building: Educational studies in Legitimation Code Theory (pp. 1–23). London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maton, K., & Doran, Y. J. (2017). SFL and code theory. In T. Bartlett & G. O’Grady (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 605–618). London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McKenna, B. (1997). How engineers write: An empirical study of engineering report writing. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 189–211. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Der Wijngaart, B., Pemberton, C., & Herring, D. (2009). Wind Power Concept Study Report. Australia: Wind Power Concept Study Working Group.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wolff, K. (2013). ‘Reservoirs’ and ‘Repertoires’: Epistemological and discursive complexities in multidisciplinary engineering practice. Journal of Academic Writing, 3(1), 84–94. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wolff, K. (2017). The manufacturing sector’s response to the lack of appropriate technical expertise in South Africa. In B. Collier-Reed (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth Biennial Conference of the South African Society for Engineering Education (pp. 439–441). Cape Town: South African Society for Engineering Education.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wolff, K., & Luckett, K. (2013). Integrating multidisciplinary engineering knowledge. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(1), 78–92. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wolmarans, N. (2016). Inferential reasoning in design: Relations between material product and specialised disciplinary knowledge. Design Studies, 45(A), 92–115. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Simpson-Smith, Claire
2023.
Recontextualising the teaching learning cycle within engineering education to improve the development of written communication skills.
Australasian Journal of Engineering Education ► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Mehta, Nikhil K. & Sumi Jha
2021.
Facilitation of team communication skill among engineers: an empirical study.
Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning 11:2
► pp. 435 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.