Article published in:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 20:1 (1997) ► pp. 21–41

Assessor accommodation in the V.C.E. Italian oral test

| Victoria University of Technology
In oral proficiency tests there are occurrences of trouble in interaction such as misunderstanding, non hearing or lack of understanding which may cause breakdown in communication. Within the context of the question-answer framework of an oral proficiency test this study investigates the interactive nature of spoken discourse between students and assessors when there is trouble in talk as perceived by the assessors, with a focus on how they accommodate to the students. A sample of twenty oral transcripts and tapes of the 1992 Victorian Certificate of Education (V.C.E.) Italian Common Assessment Task (C.A.T. 2) were randomly selected and examined. By using Conversation Analysis methodology the purpose of the study was to investigate in repair sequences types of assessor accommodation – how the assessors modified their utterances – the kinds of trouble perceived by assessors, what triggered assessor accommodation and whether the accommodations facilitated student response and participation. This study has implications for assessor training since it highlights which strategies are most successful for ensuring student understanding, participation and appropriate responses as well as demonstrating why and in which environments assessors accommodate.
Published online: 01 January 1997
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.20.1.02caf
References
Board of Studies Victoria
(1993) VCE study design – LOTE. Deartment of Education and Training, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Elder, C.
(1993) The native speaker presence in University LOTE courses. The University of Melbourne. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Filipi, A.
(1994) Interaction or interrogation? A study of talk occurring in a sample of the 1992 V.C.E. Italian Oral Common Assessment Task. (C.A.T.2). Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of MelbourneGoogle Scholar
Hatch, E.
(1978) Second language acquisition. Rowley, MA, Newbury House.Google Scholar
Heritage, J.
(1984) A change of state token and aspects of its sequential placement, in Atkinson and Heritage (eds) Structures of social action: Studies in conversational analysis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G.
(1974) Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in Society 21:181-99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1987) On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In Button and Lee (eds) Talk and social organization. Clevedon, Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Long, M.
(1981) Questions in foreigner talk discourse. Language Learning 311:135-57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1983a) Native speake\non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics 4,2:126-41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1983b) Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 5,2:177-93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, S
(1992) Accommodative questions in oral proficiency interviews. Language Testing 91:173-186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, S and R Berwick
(1990) The discourse of accommodation in oral proficiency interviews. Paper presented at RELC Seminar in Program Evaluation and Language Testing, Singapore, April 9-12 1990.
Schegloff, E.
(1979) The relevance of repair to syntax- for- conversation, in Givon, Talmy (ed) Discourse and syntax. (Syntax and Semantics 12) New York, Academic. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1987) Some sources of misunderstandings in talk-in-interaction. Linguistics 251:210-218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1992) Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology 97,5:1295-1345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E.A., G Jefferson and H. Sacks
(1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 531:361-382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Brown, Annie
2003. Interviewer variation and the co-construction of speaking proficiency. Language Testing 20:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Brown, Annie, Noriko Iwashita & Tim McNamara
2005. AN EXAMINATION OF RATER ORIENTATIONS AND TEST-TAKER PERFORMANCE ON ENGLISH-FOR-ACADEMIC-PURPOSES SPEAKING TASKS. ETS Research Report Series 2005:1 ► pp. i ff. Crossref logo
Filipi, Anna
1998. Interaction or interrogation? a study of talk occurring in a sample of the 1992 VCE Italian oral common assessment task (cat 2). Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 123 ff. Crossref logo
Kondo-Brown, Kimi
2004. Investigating Interviewer-Candidate Interactions During Oral Interviews for Child L2 Learners. Foreign Language Annals 37:4 ► pp. 601 ff. Crossref logo
ShinDongil & 김종국
2009. Exploring the relationship between predicted and actual test task functions in English speaking test. English Teaching 64:2 ► pp. 103 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.