Article published in:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 20:1 (1997) ► pp. 105132
References
Bennett, C.
(1995) Equivocation in political interviews: Understanding strategic ambiguity. ACAS Discussion Paper Series, The Australian Centre for American Studies, Sydney, University of Sydney.
Bilmes, J.
(1988) The concept of preference in conversational analysis. Language in Society. 171:161-181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. and G. Yule
(1983) Discourse analysis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bull, P.
(1994) On identifying questions, replies, and non-replies in political interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13,2:115-131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bull, P. and K. Mayer
(1993) How not to answer questions in political interviews. Journal of Political Psychology 14,4: 651-666. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clayman, S.
(1993) Reformulating the question: A device for answering/not answering questions in news interviews and press conferences. Text 13,2:159-188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Di Pietro, J.A.
(1981) Rough and tumble play: A function of gender. Developmental Psychology 17,1:50-58 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, P.
(1983) Interaction: The work women do. In B. Thome, C. Kramarae and N. Henley (eds) Language, gender and society. Rowley, MA, Newbury House.Google Scholar
Gardner, R.
(1987) The identification and role of topic in spoken interaction. Semiotica 551, 1-2: 129-141Google Scholar
Goodwin, M.H.
(1980) Directive/response speech sequences in girls’ and boys’ task activities. In S. McConnell-Ginet, R. Borker and N. Furman (eds.) Women and language in literature and society. New York, Praeger.Google Scholar
Greatbatch, D.
(1986) Aspects of topical organisation in news interviews: The use of agenda-shifting procedures by interviewees. Media, Culture and Society 81, 441-455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H.P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In (eds) P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds) Speech acts (Syntax and Semantics 31) New York, Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
James, D. and J. Drakich
(1993) Understanding gender differences in amount of talk: A critical review of research. In Tannen (ed.) Gender and conversational interaction. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kalcik, S.
(1975) ‘... like Ann’s gynecologist or the time I was almost raped’: Personal narratives in women’s rap groups. Journal of American Folklore 881:3-11.Google Scholar
Keenan, E.O. and B.B. Schiefflin
(1976) Topics as a discourse notion: A study of topics in the conversations of children and adults. In C.N. Li (ed.) Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Leaper, C.
(1991) Influence and involvement: Age, gender and partner effects. Child Development 621:797-811. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maccoby, E.E.
(1986) Social groupings in childhood: Their relationship to prosocial and antisocial behaviour in boys and girls. In D. Olweus, J. Block and M. Radke-Yarrow (eds) Development of antisocial and prosocial behaviour. San Diego, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, D.
(1990) You Just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York, William Morrow, Ballantine.Google Scholar
(ed.) (1993) Gender and conversational interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Winter, J.
(1993) Gender and the political interview in an Australian context. Journal of Pragmatics 20,2:117-139 CrossrefGoogle Scholar