Article published in:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 23:1 (2000) ► pp. 77–93

Understanding signals and reading comprehension

| Hong Kong Institute of Education
This paper explores the issues of signals and reading comprehension. A study was made of the effect of logical connectives and paragraph headings on the reading comprehension of 577 Hong Kong Secondary 6 students learning English as a Second Language. A reading comprehension placement test with normal signals was used to create three ability groups. Four versions of a text were then produced. Version 1 was a non-signalled passage; versions 2, 3, and 4 were embedded with logical connectives, paragraph headings and these two signals in combination. All four versions had the same content and level of difficulty. All signals contributed to reading comprehension for the Low Ability Group except for logical connectives, which did not aid microstructure understanding. Implications for the teaching of reading to poor readers are discussed.
Published online: 01 January 2000
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.23.1.05chu
References

References

Allison, D., S. Varghese, and S.M. Wu
(1999) Local coherence and its limits: a second look at second sentences. Journal of Second Language Writing 8,1: 77–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J.R.
(1983) The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
De Beaugrande, R.
(1997) New foundation for a science of text and discourse: cognition, communication, and the freedom of access to knowledge and society. Norwood, N.J., Ablex.Google Scholar
De Beaugrande, R. and W. Dressier
(1981) Introduction to text linguistics. London, Longman.Google Scholar
Britton, B.K., S.M. Glynn, B.J F. Meyer and M.J. Penland
(1982) Effects of text structure on use of cognitive capacity during reading. Journal of Educational Psychology 74:51–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charrow, V.R. and J.C. Redish
(1980) A study of standardized headings for warranties. (Technical Report No.6, Document Design Project). Washington, D.C., National Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Connor, U. and A.M. Johns
(1990) Coherence in writing: research and pedagogical perspectives. U.S.A., Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc.Google Scholar
Davidson, J.E., R. Deuser, and R.J. Sternberg
(1994) The role of metacogntion in problem solving. In J. Metcalfe and A.P. Shimamura (eds) Metacognition; knowing about knowing, 207–226. Cambridge, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Evensen, L.S.
(1985) Connectors in student writing: a methodological note. NORDTEXT Newsletter 4: 1–6.Google Scholar
(1990) Pointers to superstructure in student writing. In U. Connor and A.M. Johns (eds) Coherence in writing; research and pedagogical perspectives. U.S.A., Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Language, Inc.Google Scholar
Geva, E.
(1992) The role of conjunctions in L2 text comprehension. TESOL Quarterly 26,4: 731–747. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geva, E. and E.B. Ryan
(1985) Use of conjunctions in expository texts by skilled and less skilled readers. Journal of Reading Behaviour 17:331–345.Google Scholar
Glaser, R. and J.W. Pellegrino
(1987) Aptitudes for learning and cognitive processes. In F.E. Weinert and R.H. Kluwe (eds) Metacognition, motivation, and understanding, 267–288. New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K.
(1994) An introduction to functional grammar (2nd edition). London, Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. and R. Hasan,
(1976) Cohesion in English. London, Longman.Google Scholar
Hartley, J., J. Kenely, G. Owen, and M. Trueman
(1980) The effect of headings on children’s recall from prose text. British Journal of Educational Psychology 50:304–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heath, R.L. and J. Bryant
(1992) Human communication theory and research. New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hoey, M.
(1983) On the surface of discourse. Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
(1991) Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holley, C. D., D.F. Dansereau, S.H. Evans, K.W. Collins, L. Brooks and D. Larson
(1981) Utilizing intact and embedded headings as processing aids with nonnarrative text. Contemporary Educational Psychology 6:227–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, J.W.
(1982) The effects of coherence explicitness on college readers’ prose comprehension. Journal of Reading Behaviour 14:275–284.Google Scholar
Johns, A.M.
(1986) Coherence and academic writing: some definitions and suggestions for teaching. TESOL Quarterly 20,2: 47–265. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W. and T.A. van Dijk
(1978) Towards a model of discourse comprehension and production. Psychological Review 85:363–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W.
(1988) The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension. The Construction-Integration model of text comprehension. Psychological Review 95: 163–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loman, N.L. and R.E. Mayer
(1983) Signalling techniques that increase the understandability of expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology 75:402–412 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, N. and M.D. Glock
(1978) Comprehension of connected discourse: a study into the relationships between the structure of text and information recalled. Reading Research Quarterly 14:10–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, B.J.F.
(1975) The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam, North-Holland.Google Scholar
(1979) Organizational patterns in prose and their use in reading. In M.L. Kamil and A.J. Moe (eds) Reading research: studies and applications. Clemson, S.C., National Reading Conference, Inc.Google Scholar
Meyer, B.J.F., D.M. Brandt, and G.J. Bluth
(1980) Use of top-level structure in text: key for reading comprehension of ninth grade students. Reading Research Quarterly 16:72–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Otero, J.
(1998) Influence of knowledge activation and context on comprehension monitoring of science texts. In D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A.C. Grasser (eds) Metacognition in educational theory and practice, 145–164. New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Reid, J.
(1996) U.S. academic readers, ESL writers, and second sentences. Journal of Second Language Writing 5:129–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spyridakis, J.H.
(1986) Headings, logical connectives, and previews: effects on reading comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Washington.Google Scholar
Spyridakis, J.H. and T.C. Standal
(1986) Headings, previews, logical connectives; effects on reading comprehension. Journal of Technical Writing And Communication 16,4: 343–354.Google Scholar
Spyridakis, J.H.
(1989) Signalling effects: a review of the research, Part I. Journal of Technical Writing And Communication 19,3; 227–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, T.A.
(1980) Macrostructures. Hillsdale N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(1981) Studies in the pragmatics of discourse. The Hague, Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) In C.A. Weaver III, S. Mannes and C.R. Fletcher (eds) Discourse comprehension: essays in honour of Walter Kintsch, 383–410. New York, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T.A. and W. Kintsch
(1983) Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York, Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Al-Surmi, Mansoor
2011. Discourse Markers and Reading Comprehension: Is there an effect?. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 1:12 Crossref logo
Vasiljevic, Zorana
2013. Assessing Learners’ Comprehension of Logical Connectives in L2 Texts. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 3:1 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.