Article published In:
Defining Standards and Monitoring Progress in Learning Languages other than EnglishGuest-edited by Catherine Elder
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 23:2] 2000
► pp. 7–20
Guest-edited by Catherine Elder
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 23:2] 2000
► pp. 7–20
Complexities in describing and using standards in languages education in the school setting
Whose conceptions and values are at work?
References (17)
Bachman, L.F. (1990) Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Bachman, L.F. and A. Palmer (1996) Language testing in practice. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Ball, S. (2000) Performativities and fabrications in the education economy: towards the performative society? Australian Educational Researcher 27, 2: 1–23. 
Board of Studies of Victoria (2000) Curriculum Standards Framework (CSFII). Melbourne Board of Studies.
Brindley, G. (1998) Outcomes-based assessment and reporting in language learning programs: a review of the issues. Language Testing 15, 1: 45–85.
Canale, M. and M. Swain (1981) A theoretical framework for communicative competence. In A. Palmer et al. (eds) The construct validation of tests of communicative competence. Washington, Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
Department of Education, Training and Employment (2000) The South Australian Curriculum Standards and Accountability (SACSA) Framework Unpublished final draft, November 2000 available online at [URL]
Lantolf, J. and W. Frawley (1992) Proficiency: understanding the construct. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10, 2: 181–196.
(1988) Rejecting the OPI - again. ADFL Bulletin 23, 2: 34–37.
Larter, S. (1991) Benchmarks. The development of a new approach to student evaluation. Toronto, Toronto Board of Education.
MCEETYA (1999) Australia’s common and agreed national goals for schooling in the twenty-first century. Ministerial Council for Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
McKay. P. (2000) Are some standards more effective than others? Paper presented at the XXth World Congress of the Féderation Internationale de Professeurs de Languages Vivantes (FIPLV), Paris, 22-26 July 2000.
McNamara, T. (1996) Measuring second language performance. London and New York, Longman.
Messick, S. (1989) Validity. In R. Linn (ed) Educational measurement (3rd edition). New York, American Council on Education, Macmillan.
Reardon, S.F. (1994) Introduction to Symposium: Equity in Educational Assessment. Harvard Educational Review 64, 1: 1–4.
Skehan, P. (1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Spolsky, B. (1993) Testing and examinations in a national foreign language policy. In K. Sajavaara ( et al.). National foreign language policies, practices and prospects, 194–214. University of Jyväskyla.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Phakiti, Aek & Carsten Roever
2011. Current Issues and Trends in Language Assessment in Australia and New Zealand. Language Assessment Quarterly 8:2 ► pp. 103 ff. 
Scarino, Angela
2008. The Role of Assessment in Policy-Making for Languages Education in Australian Schools: A Struggle for Legitimacy and Diversity. Current Issues in Language Planning 9:3 ► pp. 344 ff.
Scarino, Angela
2012. A rationale for acknowledging the diversity of learner achievements in learning particular languages in school education in Australia. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 35:3 ► pp. 231 ff.
Leung, Constant
2004. Developing Formative Teacher Assessment: Knowledge, Practice, and Change. Language Assessment Quarterly 1:1 ► pp. 19 ff.
Leung, Constant & Bernard Mohan
2004. Teacher formative assessment and talk in classroom contexts: assessment as discourse and assessment of discourse. Language Testing 21:3 ► pp. 335 ff.
[no author supplied]
2013. References. In Intercultural Language Teaching and Learning, ► pp. 179 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.