Article In:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics: Online-First ArticlesCo-creating stories with generative AI
Reflections from undergraduate students of a storytelling service-learning subject in Hong Kong
Publicly available Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI)
tools are said to liberate students from the instrumental use of English and
empower them to write creative texts to communicate with different communities.
This paper reports on an undergraduate language-related service-learning subject
in a Hong Kong tertiary institution. In the subject, students co-created digital
stories with asylum-seeking children, in written and podcast formats, with the
help of GenAI. The qualitative content analysis of semi-structured interviews
with the students found that this experience expanded the students’ creative
potential. Meanwhile, GenAI played a peripheral role in the story creation
processes, in that the students exercised agency to use the tools and remained
critical of the AI-generated content. This study argues that digital
storytelling with GenAI, when used critically, promotes linguistic, digital and
cultural awareness among ESL learners, offering them a third space to interact
with culturally diverse communities in Hong Kong and giving them genuine
ownership of English for creative and communicative purposes.
Keywords: experiential learning, service-learning, story creation, English language learning, writing with GenAI
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Context of the study
- 1.2Organisation of the paper
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Digital storytelling and GenAI: Issues of language learner development, ‘voice,’ and ‘identity’
- 2.2GenAI for language learning: Benefits and challenges
- 2.3Integration of digital storytelling for English learning in service-learning
- 3.Research questions
- 4.Methods
- 4.1Research participants
- 4.2Data collection
- 4.3Data analysis
- 4.4Ethical considerations
- 5.Findings
- 5.1Pivotal role of English for creative and communicative purposes
- 5.2Peripheral Roles of GenAI in the Story Creation Processes
- 5.3Students’ agency of non-GenAI use
- 6.Discussion
- 6.1English learning through storytelling vs instrumentalist approaches
- 6.2Storytelling in English with GenAI: Expressing voices, identities, and agency
- 7.Concluding remarks
- Author queries
-
References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (72)
Abfalter, D., Mueller-Seeger, J., & Raich, M. (2021). Translation
decisions in qualitative research: a systematic
framework. International Journal of Social
Research
Methodology,
24
(4), 469–486.
Aguillon, C. J. T., Guinto, N. L., & Aberion, L. H. (2022). Discourse
Analysis. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative
Research in the Asian
Context, 219–233.
Barkhuizen, G. P., Benson, P., & Chik, A. (2014). Narrative
Inquiry in Language Teaching and Learning
Research. Routledge.
Barrett, A., & Pack, A. (2023). Not
quite eye to AI: student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative
artificial intelligence in the writing
process. International Journal of Educational
Technology in Higher
Education,
20
(1), 59.
Bell, J. S. (2002). Narrative
inquiry: more than just telling
stories, TESOL
Quarterly,
36
(2), 207–213.
Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (1996). Implementing
Service Learning in Higher Education. The
Journal of Higher
Education,
67
(2), 221–239.
Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P., ... & Amodei, D. (2020). Language
models are few-shot learners. Advances in
Neural Information Processing
Systems,
33
1, 1877–1901.
Camus, R. M., Lam, C. H., Ngai, G., & Chan, S. C. (2022). Service-learning
exchange in developed cities: Dissonances and civic
outcomes. Journal of Experiential
Education,
45
(4), 453–476.
Candela, A. G. (2019). Exploring
the function of member checking. The
Qualitative
Report,
24
(3), 619–628.
Canh, L. V. (2022). Working
towards Centrally Determined Levels of Proficiency: Uncovering the
Neoliberal Standardization in the Vietnam-Produced ELT
Textbooks. In A. J. Daghigh, J. M. Jan, & S. Kaur (Eds.), Neoliberalization
of English Language Policy in the Global
South (pp. 119–135). Springer International Publishing.
Chen, A. H. (2023). Integrating
Pedagogy and Practice: The Impact of Academic Service Learning in the TEFL
Context in Higher Education. Education as
Change,
27
(1), 1–24, 53–66.
Creely, E. (2024). Exploring
the Role of Generative AI in Enhancing Language Learning: Opportunities and
Challenges. International Journal of Changes
in Education.
Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2014). Transnational
identity and migrant language learners: The promise of digital
storytelling. Education Matters: The Journal
of Teaching and
Learning,
2
(1).
De Costa, P. I., Park, J. S. Y., & Wee, L. (2021). Why
linguistic
entrepreneurship?. Multilingua,
40
(2), 139–153.
Feldermann, S. K., & Hiebl, M. R. (2020). Using
quotations from non-English interviews in accounting
research. Qualitative Research in Accounting
&
Management,
17
(2), 229–262.
Fisher, J. A. (2023). Centering
the Human: Digital Humanism and the Practice of Using Generative AI in the
Authoring of Interactive Digital
Narratives. In L. Holloway-Attaway, & J. T. Murray (Eds.), Interactive
Storytelling (pp. 73–88). Springer Nature.
Hakanurmi, S. (2017). Learning
to work through narratives: Identity and meaning-making during digital
storytelling. In G. Jamissen, P. Hardy, Y. Nordkvelle, & H. Pleasants (Eds.), Digital
storytelling in higher education: International
perspectives (pp. 149–166). Palgrave Macmillan.
Han, A. (2024). StoryAI:
designing, developing, and evaluating Generative AI-powered story-authoring
platform for young learners (Doctoral
dissertation, UC Irvine).
Han, A., & Cai, Z. (2023). Design
implications of generative AI systems for visual storytelling for young
learners.
Proceedings of the 22nd
Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children
Conference
,
USA
, 470–474.
Han, A., Zhou, X., Cai, Z., Han, S., Ko, R., Corrigan, S., & Peppler, K. A. (2024). Teachers,
Parents, and Students’ perspectives on Integrating Generative AI into
Elementary Literacy
Education.
Proceedings of the
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing
Systems
,
USA
, 1–17.
Hava, K. (2021). Exploring
the role of digital storytelling in student motivation and satisfaction in
EFL education. Computer Assisted Language
Learning,
34
(7), 958–978.
Higgs, J. M., & Stornaiuolo, A. (2024). Being
Human in the Age of Generative AI: Young People’s Ethical Concerns about
Writing and Living with Machines. Reading
Research
Quarterly, 1–19.
Hofmann, V., Kalluri, P. R., Jurafsky, D., & King, S. (2024). Dialect
prejudice predicts AI decisions about people’s character, employability, and
criminality. arXiv
preprint, arXiv:2403.00742.
Hung, C. M., Hwang, G. J., & Huang, I. (2012). A
project-based digital storytelling approach for improving students’ learning
motivation, problem-solving competence and learning
achievement. Educational Technology &
Society,
15
(4), 368–379. [URL]
Hung, E. (2023, September 15).Asylum
seekers in Hong Kong wait up to 20 years for host countries to take
them, South China Morning Post
[online]. available at: [URL]
Hur, J. W., & Suh, S. (2012). Making
learning active with interactive whiteboards, podcasts, and digital
storytelling in ELL classrooms. Computers in
the
Schools,
29
(4), 320–338.
Hwang, A. H. C., Siy, J. O., Shelby, R., & Lentz, A. (2024, July). In Whose
Voice?: Examining AI Agent Representation of People in Social Interaction
through Generative
Speech.
Proceedings of the
2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems
Conference
,
USA,
224–245.
Karabatak, S. & Şengür, D. (2019). A
model suggestion on the use of digital positive storytelling method in the
training of school administrators. PAU
Journal of
Education,
46
1, 18–38.
Kim, D., & Li, M. (2021). Digital
storytelling: facilitating learning and identity
development. Journal of Computers in
Education,
8
(1), 33–61.
Kohnke, L. (2024). Exploring
EAP students’ perceptions of GenAI and traditional grammar-checking tools
for language learning. Computers and
Education: Artificial
Intelligence,
7
1, 100279.
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT
for language teaching and learning. RELC
Journal,
54
(2), 537–550.
Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential
learning: Experience as the source of learning and
development (2nd
ed.). Pearson Education.
Kortegast, C., & Davis, J. (2017). Theorizing
the self: Digital storytelling, applying theory, and multimodal
learning. College
Teaching,
65
(3), 106–114.
Koyama, J., & Kasper, J. (2022). Transworlding
and translanguaging: Negotiating and resisting monoglossic language
ideologies, policies, and
pedagogies. Linguistics and
Education,
70
1, 101010.
Kubota, R. (2022). An
Introduction to Race and Native-Speakerism in
ELT. JALT Journal: the research journal of
the Japan Association for Language
Teaching,
44
(2), 215–221.
Lambert, J. (2013). Digital
storytelling: Capturing lives, creating
community (4th
ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Lin, A. M., & Motha, S. (2020). “Curses
in TESOL”: Postcolonial desires for colonial
English. In R. Arber, M. Weimann, & J. Blackmore (Eds.), Rethinking
languages
education (pp. 15–35). Routledge.
Lo, M. M. (2024). Interrogating
‘Desire’ in Teaching English for Social Justice and Inclusion in Hong Kong
Schools. In F. Sanjakdar, & M. W. Apple (Eds.), Engaging
Critical Pedagogy in Education: Global Phenomenon, Local
Praxis (Chapter
2). Routledge.
Loo, D. B., & Sairattanain, J. (2024). My
students hardly speak English, do I still need to decolonise my teaching
practice? A dialogue with a critical
friend. English in
Education,
58
(1), 23–30.
Matsuda, P. K. (2015). Identity
in Written Discourse. Annual Review of
Applied
Linguistics,
35
1, 140–159.
McMinn, S. (2023, August 31). Shaping
the future of education: Principles and practices for AI integration in
teaching and
learning. LinkedIn. [URL]
Modern Language
Association (2023). MLA-CCCC
Joint Task Force on Writing and AI Working Paper: Overview of the Issues,
Statement of Principles, and
Recommendations. Modern Language Association of
America and Conference on College Composition and
Communication.
Mosed, H., Periord, M., & Caboral‐Stevens, M. (2021). A
concept analysis of intercultural
communication. Nursing
Forum,
56
(4), 993–999.
Muhalim, M. (2023). Neoliberal
ideology, faith-based higher education institutions, and English in
Indonesia: negotiating English teachers’ ideological
formation. Globalisation, Societies and
Education,
21
(3), 353–366.
Mutua, D. K., Ong’onda, A. N., & Oketch, O. (2024). Computer
and Mobile Assisted Language Learning: Use of Podcasts and Digital
Storytelling in Development of Speaking Skills in Upper
Primary. European Journal of Science,
Innovation and
Technology,
4
(1), 216–229. [URL]
Nikolopoulou, K. (2024). Generative
Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Exploring ways of harnessing
pedagogical Practices with the assistance of
ChatGPT. International Journal of Changes in
Education,
1
(2), 103–111.
O’Dowd, R. (2010). Online
foreign language interaction: Moving from the periphery to the core of
foreign language education?, Language
Teaching,
44
(3), 368–380.
Pellas, N. (2023). The
Effects of Generative AI Platforms on Undergraduates’ Narrative Intelligence
and Writing Self-Efficacy. Education
Sciences,
13
(11), 1155.
Pera, R., & Viglia, G. (2016). Exploring
how video digital storytelling builds relationship
experiences. Psychology &
Marketing,
33
(12), 1142–1150.
Priego, S., & Liaw, M. -L. (2017). Understanding
different levels of group functionality: activity systems analysis of an
intercultural telecollaborative multilingual digital storytelling
project. Computer Assisted Language
Learning,
30
(5), 368–389.
Rauschert, P., & Mustroph, C. (2022). Intercultural
Education through Civic Engagement: Service Learning in the Foreign Language
Classroom. In T. McConachy, I. Golubeva, & M. Wagner (Eds.), Intercultural
Learning in Language Education and
Beyond (Vol. 381, pp. 149–167). Multilingual Matters.
Rettberg, J. W. (2022, December 6). ChatGPT
is multilingual but monocultural, and it’s learning your
values. jill/txt. [URL]
Sadik, A. (2008). Digital
storytelling: A meaningful technology-integrated approach for engaged
student learning. Educational Technology
Research &
Development,
56
(4), 487–506.
Schmoelz, A. (2018). Enabling
co-creativity through digital storytelling in
education. Thinking Skills and
Creativity,
28
1, 1–13.
Selvi, A. F. (2019). Qualitative
content
analysis. In J. McKinley, & H. Rose (Eds), The
Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Applied
Linguistics (pp. 440–452), Routledge.
Shi, H., & Cheung, L. M. E. (2024). Storytelling
for understanding: a case study of an English-language digital storytelling
service-learning subject for refugee children in Hong
Kong. Journal for Multicultural
Education,
18
(1/2), 81–97.
Sun, Y., & Lan, G. (2021). Enactment
of a translingual approach to writing. TESOL
Quarterly,
55
(2), 398–426.
Tsao, J., & Nogues, C. (2024). Beyond
the author: Artificial intelligence, creative writing and intellectual
emancipation. Poetics,
102
1, 101865.
Vears, D. F., & Gillam, L. (2022). Inductive
content analysis: A guide for beginning qualitative
researchers. Focus on Health Professional
Education: A Multi-Professional
Journal, 23(1), 111–127. [URL].
Wang, L., & Fang, F. (2020). Native-speakerism
policy in English language teaching revisited: Chinese university teachers’
and students’ attitudes towards native and non-native English-speaking
teachers. Cogent
Education,
7
(1), 1778374.
Webster, A. K. (2010). “Still,
she didn’t see what I was trying to say”: Towards a history of framing
Navajo English in Navajo written
poetry. World
Englishes,
29
(1), 75–96.
Wee, L. (2003). Linguistic
instrumentalism in Singapore. Journal of
Multilingual and Multicultural
Development,
24
(3), 211–224.
White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content
analysis: a flexible methodology, Library
Trends,
55
(1), 22–45.
Wu, J., & Chen, D. T. V. (2020). A
systematic review of educational digital
storytelling. Computers &
Education,
147
1, 103786.
Yang, Y. T. C., & Wu, W. C. I. (2012). Digital
storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, critical thinking,
and learning motivation: A year-long experimental
study. Computers &
Education,
59
(2), 339–352.