Framing institutional policies on literacies

Ian Reid | Curtin University of Technology

Lesley Parker | Curtin University of Technology

In at least one fundamental respect, our universities are failing to clarify what they expect of students and what students and other stakeholders can expect of them. This failure concerns communication skills. The present paper identifies particular problems of academic literacy and proposes a coordinated institutional approach to their solution. Standards of oral and written communication among those who enter universities are often deplored by academics. Standards of oral and written communication among those who graduate are often deplored by employers. What evidence do we have about actual competencies at various levels of the higher education system? What are the practical implications for curriculum, pedagogy and assessment? How significant are cross-cultural aspects of literacy in academic settings? How distinctive are the literacy demands of different fields of study? Such questions must be explored if universities are serious about devising an appropriate framework of institutional policies to support improved literacy practices. This paper draws in part on a recently completed multi-university research project funded by the Australian Research Council on "Framing Student Literacy". Its theoretical background includes concepts of framing, particularly as developed by Tannen (1993) and MacLachlan and Reid (1994).

Published online: 01 January 2002
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.25.2.03rei

References

Bernstein, B.

(1975) On the classification and framing of educational knowledge. In Class, codes and control: theoretical studies towards a sociology of language (pp. 202–230). New York: Schocken Books.

Cummings, R.

(1998) How should we assess and report student generic attributes? Proceedings of the 1998 Teaching and Learning Forum, University of Western Australia, Perth.

Cumming, R. & Ho, R.

(1996) Survey of key competencies in selected industries in Western Australia. Perth: Murdoch University.

Latchem C., Parker, L. & Weir, J.

(1995) Communication-in-context. Perth: Curtin University of Technology.

MacLachlan, G. & Reid, I.

(1994) Framing and interpretation. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

Marginson, S.

(1993) Generic competencies. Higher Education Series Occasional Paper, no. 4. Canberra: DEET.

Parker, L.

(1997) Institutional practices in promoting tertiary literacy: the development and implementation of a university-wide policy for enhancing students’ communication skills. In Z. Golebiowski (Ed.) Policy and practice of tertiary literacy: selected proceedings of the First National Conference on Tertiary Literacy: Research and Practice, vol. 11 (pp. 20–36). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.

Parker, L., Kirkpatrick, A. & Slaney, K.

(1997) Communication skills in the context of postgraduate supervision of students from language backgrounds other than English. Internal report. Perth: Curtin University of Technology.

Reid, I.

(1996) Higher education or education for hire? Language and values in Australian universities. Rockhampton: Central Queensland University Press.

Reid, I., Kirkpatrick, A. & Mulligan, D.

(1998) Framing reading. Sydney & Perth: NCELTR in association with the Centre for Literacy, Culture and Language Pedagogy.

Ryan, J.

(1998) Struggling with academic language: tertiary literacy. Literacy and Numeracy Studies, 7(2), 55–64.

Savery, L., Dawkins, P. & Mazzarol, T.

(1995) Customers’ views of Australian management: Asian-Pacific viewpoints. In Enterprising nation: renewing Australia’s managers to meet the challenges of the Asia-Pacific century. Canberra: AGPS.

Tannen, D.

(1992) That’s not what I meant! London: Virago.

(1993) Framing in discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Clarke, Patricia, Daniel Schull, Glen Coleman, Rachael Pitt & Catherine Manathunga

2013. Enhancing professional writing skills of veterinary technology students: linking assessment and clinical practice in a communications course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38:3 ► pp. 273 ff.

Dovey, Teresa

2006. What purposes, specifically? Re-thinking purposes and specificity in the context of the ‘new vocationalism’. English for Specific Purposes 25:4 ► pp. 387 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.