Article published in:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 26:1 (2003) ► pp. 1937
Abbott, G.
(1984) Unisex ‘they’. English Language Teaching Journal, 381, 45–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, D. L.
(1987) Names and titles: maiden name retention and the use of Ms. Women and Language, 101, 37.Google Scholar
Baranowski, M.
(2002) Current usage of the epicene pronoun in written English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6 (3), 378–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D.
(1985) Feminism and linguistic theory. London: Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Verbal Hygiene. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. L.
(1984) The avoidance of androcentric generics. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 501, 5–20.Google Scholar
Cooper. R. L.
(1989) Language planning and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, S. & King, R.
(1992) Gender-based language reform and the social construction of meaning. Discourse and Society, 3 (2), 151–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fasold, R.
(1984) The sociolinguistics of society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Frank, F. W.
(1989) Language planning, language reform and language change : a review of guidelines for nonsexist usage. In F. W. Frank & P. Treichler (pp. 105–36).Google Scholar
Frank, F. W., Treichler, P.
with contributions by Gershuny, H.L., McConnell-Ginet, S. & Wolfe, S. (1989) Language, gender and professional writing. New York: MLA.Google Scholar
Gastil, J.
(1990) Generic pronouns and sexual politics: The oxymoronic character of masculine generics. Sex Roles, 231, 629–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hellinger, M.
(1990) Kontrastive feministische Linguistik. [Contrastive feminist linguistics]. Ismaning: Hueber.Google Scholar
Henley, N.
(1987) The new species that seeks a new language: on sexism in language and language change. In J. Penfield, (Ed.) Women and language in transition (pp. 3–27). Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Holmes, J.
(2001) A corpus-based view of gender in New Zealand. In M. Hellinger & H. Bussmann (Eds.) Gender across languages. Volume 11 (pp. 115–36). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Irigaray, L.
(Ed.) (1987) Le sexe linguistique. Langages 851 (entire volume).Google Scholar
(Ed.) (1990) Sexes et genres à travers les langages. [Sex and gender across languages]. Paris: Bernard Grasset.Google Scholar
Kurzon, D.
(1989) Sexist and nonsexist language in legal texts: the state of the art. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 801, 99–103.Google Scholar
Meyers, M.W.
(1993) Forms of they with singular noun phrase antecedents: Evidence from current educated English usage. Word, 441, 181–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newman, M.
(1992) Pronominal disagreements: The stubborn problem of singular epicene antecedents. Language in Society, 211, 447–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997) Epicene pronouns: The linguistics of a prescriptive problem. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Pauwels, A.
(1987) Language in transition: a study of the title ‘Ms ‘ in contemporary Australian society. In A. Pauwels (Ed.) Women and language in Australian and New Zealand society (pp. 129–54). Sydney: Australian Professional Publications.Google Scholar
(1989) Feminist language change in Australia: changes in generic pronoun use. Paper presented at the Tagung der deutschen Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft, University of Osnabrück, Germany.
(1996) Feminist language planning and titles for women: some crosslinguistic perspectives. In U. Ammon, & M. Hellinger (Eds.) Contrastive Sociolinguistics (pp. 251–69). Berlin: Mouton-De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997) Of handymen and waitpersons: a linguistic evaluation of job classifieds. Australian Journal of Communication, 24 (1), 58–69.Google Scholar
(1998) Women changing language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
(2001a) Non-sexist language reform and generic pronouns in Australian English. English World-Wide, 22 (1), 105–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001b) Spreading the feminist word: The case of the new courtesy title Ms in Australian English. In M. Hellinger, & H. Bussmann, (Eds.) Gender across languages. International perpectives of language variation and change. Volume 11. Amsterdam: Benjamins, (pp. 137–51). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002a) The sociolinguistics of generic pronouns: women and men’s use of gender-inclusive, gender-neutral and masculine generic pronouns. Paper presented at the International Sociological Association Congress, RC Sociolinguistics, Brisbane, July 2002.
(2002b) Men Msbehaving? The role of men in the adoption and spread of a linguistic innovation. Paper presented at the Sociolinguistics Symposium, University of Gent, Belgium, March 2002.
Romaine, S.
(2001) A corpus-based view of gender in British and American English. In M. Hellinger & H. Bussmann (Eds.) (pp. 153–75). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, D., Greene, K. & Schneider, D.
(1994) Adopting gender-inclusive language reforms: Diachronic and synchronic variation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 131, 91–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stringer, J.L. & Hopper, R.
(1998) Generic he in conversation. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 841, 209–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Baldauf, Richard B.
2006. Rearticulating the Case for Micro Language Planning in a Language Ecology Context. Current Issues in Language Planning 7:2-3  pp. 147 ff. Crossref logo
Bengoechea, Mercedes
2011. Non-sexist Spanish policies: an attempt bound to fail?. Current Issues in Language Planning 12:1  pp. 35 ff. Crossref logo
Clyne, Michael
2005. The use of exclusionary language to manipulate opinion. Journal of Language and Politics 4:2  pp. 173 ff. Crossref logo
Pauwels, Anne & Joanne Winter
2004. Generic pronouns and gender-inclusive language reform in the English of Singapore and the Philippines. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 27:2  pp. 50 ff. Crossref logo
Pauwels, Anne & Joanne Winter
2006. Gender Inclusivity or ‘Grammar Rules OK’? Linguistic Prescriptivism vs Linguistic Discrimination in the Classroom. Language and Education 20:2  pp. 128 ff. Crossref logo
Pauwels, Anne & Joanne Winter
2007. The Politics of Naming Reform in the Gendered Spheres of Home and Work. Current Issues in Language Planning 8:3  pp. 404 ff. Crossref logo
Winter, Jo & Anne Pauwels
2006. Men staying at home looking after their children: feminist linguistic reform and social change. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 16:1  pp. 16 ff. Crossref logo
Winter, Jo & Anne Pauwels
2006. ‘Trajectories of Agency’ and Discursive Identities in Education: A Critical Site in Feminist Language Planning. Current Issues in Language Planning 7:2-3  pp. 171 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 october 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.