Cover not available
Review published In:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 26:1 (2003) ► pp.102–105
Book review

Review of Fishman, Joshua A. (2001) Can threatened languages be saved

Reviewed by
| Research Centre for Linguistic Typology, La Trobe University
Published online: 1 January 2003
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.26.1.11aik
References
Amery, R.
(2000) Warrabarna Kaurna! Reclaiming an Australian language. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. and Muntzel, M.
(1989) The structural consequences of language death, in Dorian, N. (Ed.), Investigating obsolescence. Studies in language contraction and death (pp. 181–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
(1989) The original languages of Australia. Vox 3, 26–33.Google Scholar
Fishman, J.
(1991) Reversing language shift: theoretical and empirical foundations of assistance to threatened languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Freeland, J.
(1995) Why go to school to learn Miskitu? International Journal of Educational Development, 15, 245–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grenoble, L. and Whaley, L.J.
(Eds.) (1998) Endangered languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamp, E.
(1989) On signs of health and death, in Dorian, N.. (Ed.). Investigating obsolescence. Studies in language contraction and death (pp. 197–210). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reedy, T.
2000 Te Reo Ma@ori: the past 20 years and looking forward. Oceanic Linguistics, 39. 157–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robins, R.H. and Uhlenbeck, E.M.
(Eds.) (1991) Endangered languages. Oxford/New York: Berg.Google Scholar