Article published In:
Australian Review of Applied LinguisticsVol. 29:1 (2006) ► pp.5.1–5.19
The focus group interview
Rising to the challenge in qualitative research methodology
This paper explores the possibility of expanding the focus group interview into the field of English as a Second Language (ESL), where this research methodology is yet to be thoroughly explored. Specifically, it aims to challenge popular criticisms about the reliability and validity of the focus group as a qualitative research methodology. It does this by first setting up a list of five main criticisms of the focus group interview drawn from current literature on research methodology within the social sciences and education. Based on transcripts of interactional data gathered from focus group interviews carried out among ESL students in a formal ESL context, it then provides a direct and detailed response to each criticism. The arguments put forward demonstrate that the focus group interview, as a method of data collection, may be particularly relevant in gathering the viewpoints and opinions of participants who have traditionally not been well represented through the more conventional and common methods currently employed in ESL research studies. Furthermore, the paper raises conscious awareness about the potential of the focus group as a viable and verifiable tool in qualitative research methodology.
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].
References (43)
Agar, Michael; MacDonald, James. 1995. ‘Focus groups and ethnography’. Human organization 541: 78–86. 
Baetens-Beardsmore, Hugo. 1995. ‘Reconciling content acquisition and language acquisition in bilingual classrooms’. Paper presented at the Symposium on bilingualism through the classroom: Strategies and practices, Bandar Seri Begawan: Brunei.
Barbour, Rosaline S.; Kitzinger, Jenny, editors. 1999. Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice. London: Sage.
Basch, Charles E. 1987. ‘Focus group interview: An underutilised research technique for improving theory and practice in health education’. Health education quarterly 141: 411–448.
Bellenger, Danny N.; Bernhardt, Kenneth L.; Goldstucker, Jac L.. 1976. ‘Qualitative research techniques: Focus group interviews’. In Qualitative research in marketing, edited by Hayes, Thomas J.; Tathum, Carol B. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
Cheah, Yin Mee. 1998. ‘The examination culture and its impact on literacy innovations: The case of Singapore’. Language and education 12 (3): 192–209.
Ellis, Rod. 1992. ‘Learning to communicate in the classroom’. Studies in second language acquisition 141: 1–23.
Goldman, Alfred E.; MacDonald, Susan S.. 1987. The group depth interview: Principles and practice. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Gorsuch, Greta J.. 2000. ‘EFL educational policies and education cultures: Influences on teachers’ approval of communicative activities’. TESOL quarterly 34 (4): 675–705.
Green, Judith; Hart, Laura. 1999. ‘The impact of context on data’. In Developing focus group research, edited by Barbour, Rosaline S.; Kitzinger, Jenny. London: Sage.
Greenbaum, Tom L.. 1993. The practical handbook and guide to focus group research. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Hammersley, Martyn; Woods, Peter. 1984. Life in school. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Hargreaves, David. 1967. Social relations in a secondary school. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Heslep, Robert. 2001. ‘Habermas on communication in teaching’. Educational theory 51 (2): 191–207.
Janis, Irving L. 1982. Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Johnson, Alan. 1996. ‘It’s good to talk: The focus group and the sociological imagination’. The sociological review 44 (3): 517–538.
Kirk, Jerome; Miller, Mark L.. 1986. Reliability and validity of quantitative research. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
Kitzinger, Jenny. 1994. ‘The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants’. Sociology of health and illness 761: 103–121.
. 1994b. ‘Focus groups: Method or madness’. In Challenge and innovation: Methodological advances in social research on HIV/AIDS, edited by Boulton, Mary. New York: Taylor and Francis.
Kitzinger, Jenny; Farquhar, Clare. 1999. ‘The analytical potential of ‘sensitive moments’ in focus group discussions’. In Developing focus group research, edited by Barbour, Rosaline S.; Kitzinger, Jenny. London: Sage.
Kitzinger, Jenny; Hunt, Kate. 1993. Evaluation of Edinburgh Council’s zero tolerance campaign. Edinburgh: Edinburgh District Council Women’s Committee.
Kramsch, Claire. 1998. Language and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Krueger, Richard A.. 1994. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Krueger, Richard A.; Casey, Mary A.. 2000. Focus groups. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
Kumaravadivelu, B. 1993. ‘Maximising learning potential in the communicative classroom’. ELT journal 47 (1): 12–19.
Lazaraton, Anne. 2000. ‘Current trends in research methodology and statistics in applied linguistics’. TESOL quarterly 341: 175–181.
Litosseliti, Lia. 2003. Using focus groups in research. London, New York: Continuum.
Littlewood, William. 1981. Communicative language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayall, Berry. 1993. ‘Keeping healthy at home and school: It’s my body, so it’s my job’. Sociology of health and illness 151: 464–487.
Michell, Lynn. 1999. ‘Combining focus groups and interviews: Telling how it is; telling how it feels’. In Developing focus group research, edited by Barbour, Rosaline S.; Kitzinger, Jenny. London: Sage.
Miller, David; Kitzinger, Jenny; Williams, Kevin; Beharrell, Peter. 1998. The circuit of mass communication, London: Sage.
Morgan, David L. 1993. Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
1996. ‘Focus groups’. Annual review of sociology 221: 129–152.
1997. Focus groups as qualitative research. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
Nunan, David. 1987. ‘Communicative language teaching: Making it work’. ELT journal 41(2): 136–145.
Seedhouse, Paul. 2005. ‘“Task” as research construct’. Language learning 55 (3): 533–570.
Stewart, David W.; Shamdasani, Prem N.. 1990. Focus groups: Theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Strauss, Anselm; Corbin, Juliet. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory and procedures and techniques. Newbury Park CA: Sage.
Sussman, Steven; Burton, Dee; Dent, Clyde; Stacy, Alan; Flay, Brian. 1991. ‘Use of focus groups in developing an adolescent tobacco use cessation program: Collective norm effects’. Journal of applied social psychology 211: 1772–1782.
van Lier, Leo. 1988. The classroom and the language learner. New York: Longman.
Vaughn, Sharon; Schumm, Jeanne; Sinagub, Jane. 1996. Focus group interviews in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Williams, Kayleen. 2001. ‘Towards a rationale for foreign language education: Restating my reservations’. Australian language learning 241: 43–47.
Willis, Paul. 1977. Learning to labour. London: Gower Press.
Cited by (43)
Cited by 43 other publications
Ahmed, Naseer, Samiya Aziz, Rizwan Jouhar, Muneeba Rehmat, Afsheen Maqsood, Resham Nadeem, Laraib Magsi & Artak Heboyan
2024. Analysis of satisfaction levels and perceptions of clinical competency: a mixed method study on objective structured clinical examinations in undergraduate dental students. BMC Medical Education 24:1 
De Wilde, Vanessa
2024. Can novice teachers detect AI-generated texts in EFL writing?. ELT Journal
El-Hamamsy, Laila, Emilie-Charlotte Monnier, Sunny Avry, Frédérique Chessel-Lazzarotto, Grégory Liégeois, Barbara Bruno, Jessica Dehler Zufferey & Francesco Mondada
2024. An adapted cascade model to scale primary school digital education curricular reforms and teacher professional development programs. Education and Information Technologies 29:9 ► pp. 10391 ff.
Naigaga, Desire Alice, Jennifer Kavanagh, Ailbhe Spillane, Laura Hickey, Katherine Scott, Janis Morrissey, Shandell Elmer, Hannah Goss & Celine Murrin
2024. Using co-design to develop the Adolescent Health Literacy Questionnaire for adolescents in Ireland. Health Promotion International 39:1
Namaalwa, Betty, Josephine Bweyale & Oscar Mugula
2024. The Stakeholders’ Views on Assessment of Competence-Based Curriculum (CBC) In Selected Secondary Schools in Kampala District. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) ► pp. 116 ff.
Ntombela, Khululiwe Primrose, Margaret Angula, Igshaan Samuels, Clement Cupido, Melvin Swarts, Ewaldine Menjono-Katjizeu, Emilia Inman & Jesaya Nakanyala
2024. Pastoral coping and adaptive management strategies to climate change in communal areas in Namibia and South Africa. Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice 14
PUNAR ÖZÇELİK, Nermin & Gonca EKŞİ
2024. A Research into the Effect of Augmented Reality-Enhanced Storybook Reading on EFL Learners. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 24:1 ► pp. 20 ff.
Sharma, Shweta
2024. Exploring children’s negotiation of meanings about “D” in 2D and 3D shapes in a year 5/6 New Zealand primary classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal 36:2 ► pp. 259 ff.
Shen, Bin, Zhijie Wang, Xiaowen Zhong, Michael Yi-Chao Jiang & Morris Siu-Yung Jong
2024. Can SVVR Help with Student Engagement in an Online EFL Writing Class? A Chinese Case Study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 33:4 ► pp. 1011 ff.
Arndt, Henriette L.
2023. Construction and validation of a questionnaire to study engagement in informal second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 45:5 ► pp. 1456 ff.
Briffett Aktaş, Carla, Koon Lin Wong, Wing Fun Oliver Kong & Choi Pat Ho
2023. The student voice for social justice pedagogical method. Teaching in Higher Education ► pp. 1 ff.
Carlsson, Hanna, Fredrik Hanell & Lisa Engström
2023. Revisiting the notion of the public library as a meeting place: challenges to the mission of promoting democracy in times of political turmoil. Journal of Documentation 79:7 ► pp. 178 ff.
Li, Xueru
2023. Developing EFL Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices in Relation to Learner Autonomy Through Online Teacher Development Workshops. SAGE Open 13:4
Monnier, Emilie-Charlotte, Sunny Avry, Laila El-Hamamsy, Caroline Pulfrey, Christiane Caneva, Francesco Mondada & Jessica Dehler Zufferey
2023. From teacher to teacher-trainer: A qualitative study exploring factors contributing to a successful train-the-trainer digital education program. Social Sciences & Humanities Open 8:1 ► pp. 100518 ff.
Yuan, Rui, Xuyan Qiu, Chuang Wang & Tiefu Zhang
2023. Students’ attitudes toward language learning and use in English-medium instruction (EMI) environments: a mixed methods study. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development ► pp. 1 ff.
Girdzijauskienė, Rūta, Aida Norvilienė, Gražina Šmitienė & Liudmila Rupšienė
2022. Strengthening Student Engagement in Learning Through Use of Digital Tools. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia 49 ► pp. 115 ff.
Xia, Lily L L, Joyce L C Ma, Monica L T Yau-Ng & Cindy Yan-Yee Yiu
2022. An interactive process model of knowledge transfer for social work through university–agency collaboration: Subjective experiences of the agency social workers in Hong Kong. The British Journal of Social Work 52:7 ► pp. 4318 ff.
Adams, Chithra, Anthony Lobianco, Emily Moseley & Calisa Fitzpatrick
2021. Understanding the impact of isolation due to COVID-19 on employment for Kentuckians with spinal cord injuries. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation 54:1 ► pp. 43 ff.
Lee, Tim S.O. & Daniel H.Y. Pun
2021. The feasibility of motivational strategies in language classrooms: A tentative teacher-oriented definition. Teaching and Teacher Education 106 ► pp. 103470 ff.
Philip, Bridgit, Lynn Kemp, Christine Taylor & Virginia Schmied
2021. ‘We Do Not Talk About It’ – Exploring Visual Approaches to Initiate Deeper Conversations About Perinatal Mental Health With Indian Immigrants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 20 ► pp. 160940692110580 ff.
Hiscock, Claire
2020. International Student Voices and the VLE. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching 10:3 ► pp. 16 ff.
Shasha, Ziphozakhe Theophilus, Yong Geng, Hua-ping Sun, Walter Musakwa & Lu Sun
2020. Past, current, and future perspectives on eco-tourism: a bibliometric review between 2001 and 2018. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27:19 ► pp. 23514 ff.
Girsh, Yaron
2019. Negotiating the Uniform: Youth Attitudes towards Military Service in Israel. YOUNG 27:3 ► pp. 304 ff.
Nicholls, Claire D
2019. Innovating the Craft of Phenomenological Research Methods Through Mindfulness. Methodological Innovations 12:2 ► pp. 205979911984097 ff.
Burri, Michael, Amanda Baker & Honglin Chen
2018. Establishing a framework for learning to teach English pronunciation in an Australian TESOL program. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 41:3 ► pp. 307 ff.
Prior, Matthew T.
2018. Interviews and Focus Groups. In The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research Methodology, ► pp. 225 ff.
Githaiga, Jennifer Nyawira & Leslie Swartz
2017. Socio-cultural contexts of end- of- life conversations and decisions: bereaved family cancer caregivers’ retrospective co-constructions. BMC Palliative Care 16:1
Sandberg, Anette, Stig Broström, Inge Johansson, Thorleif Frøkjær, Christa Kieferle, Anja Seifert, Angela Roth, Maire Tuul, Aino Ugaste & Meeli Laan
2017. Children’s Perspective on Learning: An International Study in Denmark, Estonia, Germany and Sweden. Early Childhood Education Journal 45:1 ► pp. 71 ff.
Wood, Denise
2017. Smart Girls in the Media: The Impact of Popular Culture on the Development of Adolescent Rural Gifted Girls’ Identity and Subsequent Talent Development. In Giftedness and Talent, ► pp. 305 ff.
Pedersen, Birgith, Charlotte Delmar, Ursula Falkmer & Mette Grønkjær
2016. Bridging the gap between interviewer and interviewee: developing an interview guide for individual interviews by means of a focus group. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 30:3 ► pp. 631 ff.
Tachine, Amanda R., Eliza Yellow Bird & Nolan L. Cabrera
2016. Sharing Circles. International Review of Qualitative Research 9:3 ► pp. 277 ff.
Yunos, Zahri, Ramona Susanty Ab Hamid & Mustaffa Ahmad
2016. 2016 SAI Computing Conference (SAI), ► pp. 1063 ff.
Johnson, Martin, Sanjana Mehta & Nicky Rushton
2015. Assessment, aim and actuality: insights from teachers in England about the validity of a new language assessment model. Pedagogies: An International Journal 10:2 ► pp. 128 ff.
Githaiga, Jennifer Nyawira
2014. Methodological Considerations in Utilization of Focus Groups in an IPA Study of Bereaved Parental Cancer Caregivers in Nairobi. Qualitative Research in Psychology 11:4 ► pp. 400 ff.
Doiz, Aintzane, David Lasagabaster & Juan Sierra
2013. Globalisation, internationalisation, multilingualism and linguistic strains in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 38:9 ► pp. 1407 ff.
Tierney, Marie, Alexander Fraser & Norelee Kennedy
2013. Users' Experience of Physical Activity Monitoring Technology in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Musculoskeletal Care 11:2 ► pp. 83 ff.
Ahmad, Rabiah, Zahri Yunos, Shahrin Sahib & Mariana Yusoff
2012. Perception on Cyber Terrorism: A Focus Group Discussion Approach. Journal of Information Security 03:03 ► pp. 231 ff.
Bertini, Patrizia
2012. Focus Groups, Meaning Making and Data Quality. In Information Systems: Crossroads for Organization, Management, Accounting and Engineering, ► pp. 469 ff.
Ho, Debbie G. E.
2012. Focus Groups. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Ho, Debbie G. E.
2024. Focus Groups. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.
Mohd Adnan, Airil Haimi
2012. Perdre sa langue, perdre son identité, se perdre. Le cas des enfants Orang Asli (aborigènes) de Malaisie1. Droit et Cultures :63 ► pp. 87 ff.
Stanojević, Mateusz-Milan, Višna Kabalin Borenić & Višnja Josipović Smojver
2012. Combining Different Types of Data in Studying Attitudes to English as a Lingua Franca. Research in Language 10:1 ► pp. 29 ff.
Haugh, Michael
2008. The discursive negotiation of international student identities. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 29:2 ► pp. 207 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.