Cover not available
Article published In:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 3:2 (1980) ► pp.131–144

ESL matching cloze deletion types and their relationship to vernacular language background

In recent years, research with both first and second language students has suggested that the standard nth word cloze -procedure could be improved as a measure of reading comprehension through the introduction of multiple-choice or matching cloze formats. In addition, research conducted mainly with first language students, has suggested that the every nth word deletion procedure should be restricted so as to delete only the lexical words in the passage. In this study, three different deletion systems, presented in a matching cloze format, were evaluated as measures of reading comprehension for seventh grade ESL students from Papua New Guinea. The possible interaction of the three deletion types with these students’ vernacular background was also investigated.
Published online: 1 January 1980
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.3.2.10bal
References (45)
References
Aitken, Kenneth G. 1975. “Problems in cloze testing re-examined: A reply to Roger K. Williams.” TESL Reporter, 8, 9, 16–18.Google Scholar
1977. “Using cloze procedure as an overall language proficiency test.” TESOL Quarterly, 111, 59–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978. “Constructing a multiple choice test of E.S.L..” RELC Journal, 91, 105–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Jonathan. 1976. Psycholinguistic Experiments in Foreign Language Testing. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Baldauf, Richard B., Jr. and Ivan K. Propst, Jr. 1978. “Preliminary evidence regarding the validity of a modified cloze procedure for lower elementary ESL students.” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 381, 451–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baldauf, Richard B., Jr. and Robert Morley. 1979. “Matching cloze as an evaluation procedure of slow learning children.” The Exceptional Child, 261, 23–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baldauf, Richard B., Jr. and Ivan K. Propst, Jr. In Press. “Matching and multiple-choice cloze tests.” Journal of Educational Research.
Baldauf, Richard B., Jr., Robert L.T. Dawson, John Prior, Ivan K. Propst, Jr. In Press. “Can matching cloze be used with secondary ESL pupils?” Journal of Reading.
Blachowicz, Canille L.Z. 1977. “Cloze activities for primary readers.” The Reading Teacher. 311, 300–302.Google Scholar
Bormuth, John T. 1970. On the Theory of Achievement Test Items. Chicago University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bowers, Frederick and Phil L. Nacke. 1971-72. “Cloze, transformational theory and redundancy.” Journal of Reading Behaviour, 41, 20–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyce, Max W. 1974. “The cloze procedure – Some methodological considerations.” Probe, 31, 17–27.Google Scholar
Clark, Milton L. and Barbara Johnson. 1973. “Cloze procedures in measuring comprehension: Simple or complex.” Q.I.E.R. Journal, 21, 13–22.Google Scholar
Common Core Course for English. n.d. Port Moresby: Department of Education, 20, 17; 20, 18; 23, 1; 23, 45.
Connor, Ulla and Charles Read. 1978. “Passage dependency in ESL reading comprehension tests.” Language Learning, 281, 149–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darnell, Donald K. 1968. The Development of an English Language Proficiency Test of Foreign Students Using a Clozentropy Procedure, Final Report. Dept. of Speech and Drama, Colorado University Boulder, ERIC ED 024 039.Google Scholar
Ebel, R. L.. 1961. “Must all tests be valid?” American Psychologist, 161, 640–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farr, R. 1969. Reading: What can be measured? Newark, Del: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Ferguson, G. A. 1976. Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education (4th). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Greene, Frank P. 1965. “Modification of the cloze procedure and changes in reading test performance.” Journal of Education Measurement, 21, 213–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heitzman, Andrew J. and Richard H. Bloomer. 1967. “The effect of non-overt reiforced cloze procedure upon reading comprehension.” Journal of Reading, 111, 213–223.Google Scholar
Jongsma, Eugene. 1971. The Cloze Procedure as a Teaching Technique. Newark, De.: International Reading Association, 40p.Google Scholar
Jonz, Jon. 1976. “Improving on the basic egg: The M-C cloze.” Language Learning, 261, 255–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klingbergs, Ed and Dan Doorn. 1977. Marianas Test of English Achievement Reading Comprehension (Form B), Saipan: Department of Education.Google Scholar
Louthan, Vincent. 1965. “Some systematic grammatical deletions and their effects on reading comprehension.” English Journal, 541, 294–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nystrand, Martin. 1976. “Ontological Aspects of Validity Concerns in Language Arts Assessment.” Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 32p. ERIC ED, 133 733.Google Scholar
Ohnmacht, Fred W., Wendell W. Weaver and Emmett T. Kohler. 1970. “Cloze and closure: a factorial study.” Journal of Psychology, 741, 205–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oiler, John W., Jr. 1972. “Scoring methods and difficulty levels for cloze tests of proficiency in English as a second language.” Modern Language Journal, 561, 151–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1973. “Cloze tests of second language proficiency and what they measure.” Language Learning, 231, 104–118.Google Scholar
1976. “Language testing today: An interview with John Oiler.” English Teaching Forum, XIV1, 22–27.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, Robert P. and R. T. Schuder. 1977. “Some Issues in the Measurement of Basic Competence in Reading.” Paper presented at 61st Annual AERA Meeting, New York, 51p. ERIC ED 148 897.
O’Reilly, Robert P. and Ronald E. Streeter. 1977. “Report on the development and validation of a system for measuring literal comprehension in a multiple-choice cloze format: Preliminary analytic results.” Journal of Reading Behaviour, 91, 45–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ozete, Oscar. 1977. “The cloze procedure: A Modification.” Foreign Language Annals, 101, 565, 568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Porter, D. 1956. “Modified cloze procedure: A more valid reading comprehension test.” English Language Teaching Journal, 301, 151–155.Google Scholar
Propst, Ivan K., Jr. and Richard B. Baldauf, Jr. 1979. “Use matching cloze tests for elementary ESL students.” The Reading Teacher, 321, 683–690.Google Scholar
Rankin, Earl F. 1958. “An evaluation of the cloze procedure as a technique for measuring reading comprehension.” (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan, 1957). Dissertation Abstracts, 191, 733–734.Google Scholar
Schneyer, J. Wesley. 1965. “Use of the cloze procedure for improving reading comprehension.” The Reading Teacher, 191, 174–79.Google Scholar
Shaw, John Robert and Janet Shaw. 1969. The New Horizon Ladder Dictionary of the English Language. New York: Signet Bopks.Google Scholar
Taylor, Wilson L. 1956. “Recent developments in the use of ‘cloze procedure’.” Journalism Quarterly, 33, 42–46, 99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1957. “‘Cloze’ readability scores as indices of individual differences in comprehension and attitude.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 411, 19–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thorndike, Robert L. and Elizabeth Hagan. 1969. Measurement and Evaluation in Psychology and Education. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Trust Territory Government. 1979. Micronesian Achievement Test Series (MATS), Reading, Level I-III, Form A. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Tuinman, J. Jaap and Gordon Gray. 1972. “The effect of reducing the redundancy of written messages by deletion of function words.” Journal of Psychology, 821, 299–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Roger K. 1974. “Problems in cloze testing.” TESL Reporter, 71, 7–8.Google Scholar
Wurm, S. A. 1970. “Indigenous languages.” In R. G. Ward and D. A. M. Lea, An Atlas of Papua and New Guinea. Glasgow: Collins Longman.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Victoria, Mabel, Frank Hang Xu & Nick Pilcher
2024.  English as a Lingua Franca : intercultural interaction in the context of Asian ‘third space’ . Asian Englishes ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.