Article published in:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 3:2 (1980) ► pp. 131144
References

References

Aitken, Kenneth G.
1975 “Problems in cloze testing re-examined: A reply to Roger K. Williams.” TESL Reporter, 8, 9, 16–18.Google Scholar
1977 “Using cloze procedure as an overall language proficiency test.” TESOL Quarterly, 11, 59–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1978 “Constructing a multiple choice test of E.S.L..” RELC Journal, 9, 105–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Jonathan
1976Psycholinguistic Experiments in Foreign Language Testing. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Baldauf, Richard B., Jr. and Ivan K. Propst, Jr.
1978 “Preliminary evidence regarding the validity of a modified cloze procedure for lower elementary ESL students.” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 451–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baldauf, Richard B., Jr. and Robert Morley
1979 “Matching cloze as an evaluation procedure of slow learning children.” The Exceptional Child, 26, 23–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baldauf, Richard B., Jr. and Ivan K. Propst, Jr.
In Press. “Matching and multiple-choice cloze tests.” Journal of Educational Research.
Baldauf, Richard B., Jr., Robert L.T. Dawson, John Prior, Ivan K. Propst, Jr.
In Press. “Can matching cloze be used with secondary ESL pupils?Journal of Reading.
Blachowicz, Canille L.Z.
1977 “Cloze activities for primary readers.” The Reading Teacher. 31, 300–302.Google Scholar
Bormuth, John T.
1970On the Theory of Achievement Test Items. Chicago University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bowers, Frederick and Phil L. Nacke
1971-72 “Cloze, transformational theory and redundancy.” Journal of Reading Behaviour, 4, 20–33.Google Scholar
Boyce, Max W.
1974 “The cloze procedure – Some methodological considerations.” Probe, 3, 17–27.Google Scholar
Clark, Milton L. and Barbara Johnson
1973 “Cloze procedures in measuring comprehension: Simple or complex.” Q.I.E.R. Journal, 2, 13–22.Google Scholar
Common Core Course for English. n.d
Port Moresby: Department of Education, 20, 17; 20, 18; 23, 1; 23, 45.
Connor, Ulla and Charles Read
1978 “Passage dependency in ESL reading comprehension tests.” Language Learning, 28, 149–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Darnell, Donald K.
1968The Development of an English Language Proficiency Test of Foreign Students Using a Clozentropy Procedure, Final Report. Dept. of Speech and Drama, Colorado University Boulder, ERIC ED 024 039.Google Scholar
Ebel, R. L.
1961 “Must all tests be valid?American Psychologist, 16, 640–647. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farr, R.
1969Reading: What can be measured? Newark, Del: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Ferguson, G. A.
1976Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education (4th). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Greene, Frank P.
1965 “Modification of the cloze procedure and changes in reading test performance.” Journal of Education Measurement, 2, 213–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heitzman, Andrew J. and Richard H. Bloomer
1967 “The effect of non-overt reiforced cloze procedure upon reading comprehension.” Journal of Reading, 11, 213–223.Google Scholar
Jongsma, Eugene
1971The Cloze Procedure as a Teaching Technique. Newark, De.: International Reading Association, 40p.Google Scholar
Jonz, Jon.
1976 “Improving on the basic egg: The M-C cloze.” Language Learning, 26, 255–265. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klingbergs, Ed and Dan Doorn
1977Marianas Test of English Achievement Reading Comprehension (Form B), Saipan: Department of Education.Google Scholar
Louthan, Vincent
1965 “Some systematic grammatical deletions and their effects on reading comprehension.” English Journal, 54, 294–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nystrand, Martin
1976 “Ontological Aspects of Validity Concerns in Language Arts Assessment.” Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 32p. ERIC ED, 133 733.Google Scholar
Ohnmacht, Fred W., Wendell W. Weaver and Emmett T. Kohler
1970 “Cloze and closure: a factorial study.” Journal of Psychology, 74, 205–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oiler, John W., Jr.
1972 “Scoring methods and difficulty levels for cloze tests of proficiency in English as a second language.” Modern Language Journal, 56, 151–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1973 “Cloze tests of second language proficiency and what they measure.” Language Learning, 23, 104–118.Google Scholar
1976 “Language testing today: An interview with John Oiler.” English Teaching Forum, XIV, 22–27.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, Robert P. and R. T. Schuder
1977 “Some Issues in the Measurement of Basic Competence in Reading.” Paper presented at 61st Annual AERA Meeting, New York, 51p. ERIC ED 148 897.
O’Reilly, Robert P. and Ronald E. Streeter
1977 “Report on the development and validation of a system for measuring literal comprehension in a multiple-choice cloze format: Preliminary analytic results.” Journal of Reading Behaviour, 9, 45–69.Google Scholar
Ozete, Oscar
1977 “The cloze procedure: A Modification.” Foreign Language Annals, 10, 565, 568. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Porter, D.
1956 “Modified cloze procedure: A more valid reading comprehension test.” English Language Teaching Journal, 30, 151–155.Google Scholar
Propst, Ivan K., Jr. and Richard B. Baldauf, Jr.
1979 “Use matching cloze tests for elementary ESL students.” The Reading Teacher, 32, 683–690.Google Scholar
Rankin, Earl F.
1958 “An evaluation of the cloze procedure as a technique for measuring reading comprehension.” (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan 1957) Dissertation Abstracts, 19, 733–734.Google Scholar
Schneyer, J. Wesley
1965 “Use of the cloze procedure for improving reading comprehension.” The Reading Teacher, 19, 174–79.Google Scholar
Shaw, John Robert and Janet Shaw
1969The New Horizon Ladder Dictionary of the English Language. New York: Signet Bopks.Google Scholar
Taylor, Wilson L.
1956 “Recent developments in the use of ‘cloze procedure’.” Journalism Quarterly, 33, 42–46, 99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1957 “ ‘Cloze’ readability scores as indices of individual differences in comprehension and attitude.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 41, 19–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thorndike, Robert L. and Elizabeth Hagan
1969Measurement and Evaluation in Psychology and Education. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Trust Territory Government
1979Micronesian Achievement Test Series (MATS), Reading, Level I-III, Form A. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Tuinman, J. Jaap and Gordon Gray
1972 “The effect of reducing the redundancy of written messages by deletion of function words.” Journal of Psychology, 82, 299–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Roger K.
1974 “Problems in cloze testing.” TESL Reporter, 7, 7–8.Google Scholar
Wurm, S. A.
1970 “Indigenous languages.” In R. G. Ward and D. A. M. Lea, An Atlas of Papua and New Guinea. Glasgow: Collins Longman.Google Scholar