Cover not available
Part of
Language as Action
Edited by Maurice Nevile and Johanna Rendle-Short
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 30:3] 2007
► pp. 30.1–30.13
Miscellaneous

Language as action

| University of Canberra
| The Australian National University
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 1 January 2007
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.2104/aral0730
References (66)
Ardington, A. M. 2003. ‘Alliance building in girls’ talk: A conversational accomplishment of playful negotiation’. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 26 (1): 38–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arminen, I. 2005. Institutional Interaction: Studies of Talk at Work. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Astbury, V. 1994. ‘The use of turn-taking resources in a Khmer-Australian English conversation’.In Spoken Interaction Studies in Australia, edited byGardner, R. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics Series S 111: 173–184. Melbourne: Applied Linguistics Association of Australia.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. M.; Heritage. J. editors. 1984. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barraja-Rohan, A. M. 1994. ‘A very delayed acceptance to an invitation in a French conversation’.In Spoken Interaction Studies in Australia, edited byGardner, R. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics Series S 111: 153–172. Melbourne: Applied Linguistics Association of Australia.Google Scholar
1997. ‘Teaching conversation and sociocultural norms with conversation analysis’. In Teaching Language Teaching Culture, edited by Liddicoat, A.J. and Crozet, C. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics Series S 141. Melbourne: Applied Linguistics Association of Australia.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. 1997. ‘Theoretical practice: Applied linguistics as pure and practical science’. In Applied Linguistics Across Disciplines, edited by Mauranen, A. and Sajavaara, K. AILA Review 121 1995/6: 18–30.Google Scholar
2004. ‘Applied linguistics in 2004. Unity in diversity?’ In World Applied Linguistics. A Celebration of 40 Years of AILA, edited byGass, S. M. and Makoni, S. AILA Review 171: 133–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canale, M. 1983. ‘From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy’. In Language and Communication, edited by Richards, J.C. and Schmidt, R. W. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Canale, M.; Swain, M. 1980. ‘Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing’. Applied Linguistics 11: 1–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N.; Sarangi, S.; Candlin, C.N., editors. 2001. Sociolinguistics and Social Theory. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Davies, A.; Elder, C., editors. 2004. The Handbook of Applied Linguistics. Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Döpke, S.; >Brown, A.; Liddicoat, A.; Love, K. 1994. ‘Closings in talkback radio: Institutional effects on conversational routines’. In Spoken Interaction Studies in Australia, edited by Gardner, R. 21–46. Melbourne: Applied Linguistics Association of Australia.Google Scholar
Drew, P. 2005. ‘Conversation analysis’. In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, edited by Fitch, K. L. and Sanders, R. E. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Drew, P.; Heritage, J., editors. 1992. Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, editors. 2006. Conversation Analysis. Four Volumes. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, P.; Raymond, G.; Weinberg, D., editors. 2006. Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emmison, M. 1993. ‘On the analyzability of conversational fabrication: A conceptual inquiry and single case example’. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 16 (1): 83–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filipi, A. 1994. ‘Interaction in an Italian oral test: The role of some expansion sequences’. In Spoken Interaction Studies in Australia, edited byGardner, R. 119–136. Melbourne: Applied Linguistics Association of Australia.Google Scholar
1998. ‘Interaction or interrogation? A study of talk occurring in a sample of the 1992 VCE Italian oral common assessment talk (Cat 2)’. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 21 (2): 123–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firth, A.; Wagner, J. 1997. ‘On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in second language acquisition research’. Modern Language Journal 81 (3): 285–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998. ‘SLA property: No trespassing! A reply’. Modern Language Journal 82 (1): 91–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Francis, D.; Hester, S. 2004. An Invitation to Ethnomethodology: Language, Society and Social Interaction. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
In press. Orders of Ordinary Action: Respecifying Sociological Knowledge.Aldershot: Ashgate.
Gardner, R. editor. 1994. Spoken Interaction Studies in Australia. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics Series S 111. Melbourne: Applied Linguistics Association of Australia.Google Scholar
2000. ‘Resources for delicate manoeuvres: Learning to disagree’. In Discourse Analysis and Language Teaching, edited by Soler, E.A. and Guzman, J.R. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics Series S 161. Melbourne: Applied Linguistics Association of Australia.Google Scholar
2001. When Listeners Talk: Response Tokens and Listener Stance. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. ‘Conversation analysis’. In The Handbook of Applied Linguistics, edited by Davies, A. and Elder, C. Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R.; Wagner, J., editors. 2004. Second Language Conversations. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C.; Heritage, J. 1990. ‘Conversation analysis’. Annual Review of Anthropology 191: 283–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grabe, W. 2004. ‘Perspectives in applied linguistics: A North American view’. In World Applied Linguistics. A Celebration of 40 Years of AILA, edited by Gass, S.M. and Makoni, S. 105–132. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Have, P., ten. 1999. Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: Sage.Google Scholar
, ten. 2004. Understanding Qualitative Research and Ethnomethodology. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, C.; Luff, P. 2000. Technology in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. 2005. ‘Conversation analysis and institutional talk’. In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, edited by Fitch, K.L.; Sanders, R.E. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Heritage, J.; Maynard, D. 2006. Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, I.; Wooffitt, R. 1998. Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. 1997. ‘Impressions of AILA 1996’. In Applied Linguistics Across Disciplines, edited by Mauranen, A.; Sajavaara, K. 87–92. Milton Keynes: AILA.Google Scholar
Lerner, G. H. editor. 2004. Conversation Analysis: Studies From the First Generation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddicoat, A.; Döpke, S. 1998. ‘The structure of callers’ contributions in talkback radio’. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 21 (2): 79–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markee, N. 2000. Conversation Analysis. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McHoul, A.; Rapley, M., editors. 2001. How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings. London: Continuum International. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevile, M. 2002. ‘Coordinating talk and non-talk activity in the airline cockpit’. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 25 (1): 131–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. Beyond the Black Box: Talk-in-Interaction in the Airline Cockpit. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
2005. ‘Checklist complete. Or is it? Closing a task in the airline cockpit’. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 28 (2): 60–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, A.; Fehr, B.J. 1997. ‘Conversation analysis: An approach to the study of social action as sense making practices’. In Discourse as Social Interaction. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Vol Two, edited by van Dijk, T.A. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Psathas, G. 1995. Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Interaction. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rendle-Short, J. 1999. ‘When “okay” is okay in computer science seminar talk’. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 22 (2): 19–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. ‘So what does that show us?: Analysis of the discourse marker “so” in the academic monologue’. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 26 (3): 46–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. The Academic Presentation: Situated Talk in Action. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Richards, K.; Seedhouse, P., editors. 2005. Applying Conversation Analysis. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Two volumes. Edited by Gail Jefferson. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, H; Schegloff, E. A.; Jefferson, G. 1974. ‘A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation’. Language 50 (4): 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. 1996. ‘Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction’. In Interaction and Grammar, edited by Ochs, E., Schegloff, E.A.; Thompson, S.A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. ‘Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted’. In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, edited by Enfield, N.J. ; Levinson, S.C. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Vol 11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.; Koshik, I.; Jacoby, S.; Olsher, D. 2002. ‘Conversation analysis and applied linguistics’. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 221: 3–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.; Sacks, H. 1973. ‘Opening up closings’. Semiotica 81: 289–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seedhouse, P. 2004. The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Silverman, D. 1998. Harvey Sacks: Social Science and Conversation Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, C. D. 1996. ‘Competing constraints in alternative dispute resolution: The interactional achievement of formality and informality in mediation’. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 19 (2): 79–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
So’o, A.; Liddicoat, A. 2000. ‘Telephone openings in Samoan’. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 23 (1): 95–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, E. 1994. ‘Preference organization in teacher-supervisor talk’. In Spoken Interaction Studies in Australia, edited by Gardner, R. 137–152. Melbourne: Applied Linguistics Association of Australia.Google Scholar
Wagner, J. 1996. ‘Foreign language acquisition through interaction’. Journal of Pragmatics 261: 215–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wooffitt, R. 2005. Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: A Comparative and Critical Introduction. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Katerinakis, Theodoros
2019. Communication and Human Factors Phenomena in Aviation Transmit Knowledge. In The Social Construction of Knowledge in Mission-Critical Environments [Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management, ], ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.