Cover not available
Article published In:
Language as Action
Edited by Maurice Nevile and Johanna Rendle-Short
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 30:3] 2007
► pp. 32.1–32.19

Troubled conception

Negotiating the likelihood of having children

| University of Tasmania
In the context of low fertility and Australia’s ageing population, a national longitudinal telephone survey, Negotiating the Life Course (NLC), asks women about their childbearing intentions. This paper uses conversation analysis (CA) to examine interaction between an interviewer and respondents on one NLC question about the likelihood of having children, Question 165. The analysis focuses on excerpts from troubled interviews, making transparent the task of negotiating responses acceptable to the interviewer and shedding light on problems inherent in the question for older women and women for whom prediction is difficult. Analysis shows the trouble to result from lack of congruence in the purposes of the researcher and the respondent: the researcher asks about likelihood, whereas the respondent tells her own story.
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 1 January 2007
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.2104/aral0732
References (58)
Australian Academy of Science. 1995. Population 2040: Australia’s Choice. Symposium of the 1994 Annual General Meeting of the Australian Academy of Science. Canberra: Australian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2004. Australian Historical Population Statistics – 4, Births. Catalogue No. 3105.0.65.001. Canberra.Google Scholar
Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS). 1998. Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing: Interviewer Manual. Melbourne.Google Scholar
Bailey, K. D. 1982. Methods of Social Research. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Button, G.; Casey, N. 1984. ‘Generating topic: The use of topic initial elicitors’. In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by Atkinson, J.M.; Heritage, J. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coates, J. 1996. Women Talk: Conversation Between Women Friends. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Coombs, L.; Freedman, R. 1964. ‘Use of telephone interviews in a longitudinal fertility survey’. Public Opinion Quarterly 28 (1): 112–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, F. J.; Mangione, T.W. 1990. Standardized Survey Interviewing: Minimizing Interviewer-Related Error. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. 2004. ‘Conversation analysis transcription’. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics Series S. 111: 185–191.Google Scholar
2005. ‘Acknowledging strong ties between utterances in talk: Connections through right as a response token’. Proceedings of the 2004 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, October 10. Retrieved August 29, 2006, from [URL].
Headey, B.; Warren, D.; Harding, G. 2006. Families, Incomes and Jobs: A Statistical Report of the HILDA Survey. Melbourne: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. C.; Watson, D.R. 1979. ‘Formulations as conversational objects’. In Everyday Language Studies in Ethnomethodology, edited by Psathas, G. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. 1995. ‘Meeting both ends: Between standardization and recipient design in telephone survey interviews’. In Situated Order: Studies in the Social Organization of Talk and Embodied Activities, edited by ten Have, P.; Psathas, G. Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, and University Press of America.Google Scholar
1996. ‘Probing behaviour of interviewers in the standardized semi-open research interview’. Quality and Quantity 301: 205–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. Interaction and the Standardized Survey Interview: The Living Questionnaire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002. ‘Questioning turn format and turn-taking problems in standardized interviews’. In Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview, edited by Maynard, D.W.; Houtkoop-Steenstra, H.; Schaeffer, N.C.; van der Zouwen, J. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Houtkoop-Steenstra, H.; Antaki, C. 1997. ‘Creating happy people by asking yes-no questions’. Research on Language and Social Interaction 30 (4): 285–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Institute for Resource Development (IRD) and Westinghouse Electric Corporation (WEC). 1987a. ‘Model A questionnaire with commentary for high contraceptive prevalence countries’. DHS Basic Documentation Phase II. Columbia, Maryland.Google Scholar
. 1987b. ‘Model B questionnaire with commentary for low contraceptive prevalence countries’. DHS Basic Documentation Phase II. Columbia, Maryland.Google Scholar
Institute for Resource Development (IRD) and Macro Systems Inc. (MSI). 1990a. ‘Model A questionnaire with commentary for high contraceptive prevalence countries’. DHS Basic Documentation Phase II. Columbia, Maryland.Google Scholar
Institute for Resource Development (IRD) and Macro Systems Inc.(MSI). 1990b. ‘Model B questionnaire with commentary for low contraceptive prevalence countries’. DHS Basic Documentation Phase II. Columbia, Maryland.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. 1984. ‘Transcription notation’. In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by Atkinson, J.M.; Heritage, J. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kippen, R. 2003. ‘Trends in age- and parity-specific fertility in Australia’. Working Papers in Demography 911. Canberra: Demography and Sociology Program, Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Kippen, R.; McDonald, P. 2004. ‘Can increased immigration be perceived as a substitute for low fertility?’ People and Place 12 (3): 18–27.Google Scholar
2006. ‘Projecting fertility using synthetic parity progression ratios with application to Australia’. Paper presented at European Population Conference, Liverpool, United Kingdom, 21–24 June, 2006.
Legge, K. 2005. ‘Born lucky’. Weekend Inquirer Special Edition (9–10 April): 191, 28.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. 1989. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, P. 1997. Personal communication concerning purpose of NLC questions, November 1997.Google Scholar
2005. ‘Has the Australian fertility rate stopped falling?’ People and Place 13 (3): 1–5.Google Scholar
May, M. B. 2002. ‘Asking Women About Having Children: Interaction in Telephone Survey Interviews’. PhD thesis, Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Maynard, D. W.; Houtkoop-Steenstra, H.; Schaeffer, N. C.; van der Zouwen, J. eds. 2002.Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview.New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Maynard, D. W.; Schaeffer, N.C. 1997. ‘Keeping the gate’. Sociological Methods and Research 26 (1): 34–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002. ‘Standardization and its discontents’. In Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview, edited by Maynard, D.W.; Houtkoop-Steenstra, H.; Schaeffer, N.C.; van der Zouwen, J. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Mazeland, H.; ten Have, P. 1998. Essential Tensions in (Semi-) Open Research Interviews. Retrieved October 21, 1998, from [URL].
Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research. 2004. The HILDA Survey. Retrieved August 28, 2006, from [URL]/.
Melbourne Survey Group. 1979. Melbourne Survey 1977: Vol. 2 Recently Married 516 Females. Canberra: Department of Demography, The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Molenaar, N. J.; Smit, J.H. 1996. ‘Asking and answering yes/no questions in survey interviews: A conversational approach’. Quality and Quantity 301: 115–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, N.; Adams, K. 1983. ‘“Heheh” in conversation: Some coordinating accomplishments of laughter’. Western Journal of Communication 471: 175–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Office of the Status of Women. 1999. Women in Australia 1999. Canberra.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. 1984. ‘Pursuing a response’. In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by Atkinson, J.M.; Heritage, J. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Potter, J. 2003. ‘Review essay: Studying the standardized interview as interaction’. Qualitative Research 3 (2): 269–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Psathas, G. 1995. Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk in Interaction. Thousand Oaks: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H.; Schegloff, E. A.; Jefferson, G. 1974. ‘A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation’. Language 501: 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H. 1987. ‘On the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation’. In Talk and Social Organization, edited by Button, G.; Lee, J.R.E. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, N. C.; Maynard, D. W.; Cradock, R. 1993. ‘Negotiating uncertainty: Uncertainty proposals and their disposal in standardized survey interviews’. Draft paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, St Petersburg, Florida May 1992, and at the meeting of the International Sociological Association Research Committee (Sociolinguistics), June 25, 1992, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Schaeffer, N. C.; Thomson, E. 1992. ‘The discovery of grounded uncertainty: Developing standardized questions about the strength of fertility motivation’. Sociological Methodology 221: 37–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. 1987. ‘Recycled turn beginnings: A precise repair mechanism in conversation’s turn-taking organisation’. In Talk and Social Organization, edited by Button, G.; Lee, J.R.E. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
1995. ‘Post-expansion’. In Sequence Organization, edited by Schegloff, E. Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.; Jefferson, G.; Sacks, H. 1977. ‘The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation’. Language 531: 361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.; Sacks, H. 1973. ‘Opening up closings’. Semiotica 8 (4): 289–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schober, M. F.; Conrad, F.G. 2002. ‘A collaborative view of standardized survey interviews’. In Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview, edited by Maynard, D.W.; Houtkoop-Steenstra, H.; Schaeffer, N.C.; van der Zouwen, J. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Silverman, D. 1998. Harvey Sacks: Social Science and Conversation Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Singh, S. 1984. Comparability of questionnaires: Forty-one WFS countries. WFS Comparative Studies 321 (June). London: World Fertility Survey.Google Scholar
Smit, J. H. 1995. ‘Suggestieve vragen in survey-interviews: Voorkomen, oorzaken en gevolgen’. PhD dissertation, Amsterdam: Faculteit der Sociaal-Culturele Wetenschappen, Vrije Universiteit.Google Scholar
Stanton, D. 2002. ‘The fertility crisis? Director’s report’. Family Matters 631: 2–3.Google Scholar
Suchman, L.; Jordan, B. 1990. ‘Interactional troubles in face-to-face survey interviews’. Journal of the American Statistical Association 85 (409): 232–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tesfaghiorghis, H. 2006. ‘Australia’s fertility: A HILDA Survey based analysis’. 87–104. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs.Google Scholar
The Australian National University, no date. Negotiating the Life Course. Retrieved August 28, 2006, from [URL].