Article published In:
Language as Action
Edited by Maurice Nevile and Johanna Rendle-Short
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 30:3] 2007
► pp. 34.134.15
References
Antaki, C.; Widdicombe, S.
editors 1998Identities in Talk. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Button, G.
(1991) ‘Conversation-in-a-series’. In Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, edited by Boden, D.; Zimmerman, D. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Erber, N. P.; Lind, C.
1994 ‘Communication therapy: Theory and practice’. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology (Monograph) Gagne, J.P.; Tye-Murray, N., editors., Research in Audiological Rehabilitation: Current Trends and Future Directions, 271, 267–287.Google Scholar
Gagne, J. P.; Rochette, A. J.; Charest, M.
2002 ‘Auditory, visual and audiovisual clear speech’. Speech Communication 371: 213–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R.
1994 ‘Conversation analysis transcription’. In Spoken Interaction Studies in Australia, edited by Gardner, R. 185–191. Melbourne: Applied Linguistics Association of Australia.Google Scholar
2001When Listeners Talk: Response Tokens and Listener Stance. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C.
1981Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C.; Goodwin, M.
1987 ‘Concurrent operations in talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments’. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics 1 (1): 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J.
1984 ‘A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement’. In Structures of Social Interaction: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by Atkinson, J.; Heritage, J. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hetu, R.
1996 ‘The stigma attached to hearing impairment’. Scandinavian Audiology 251 ((Suppl 43)): 12–24.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G.
1987 ‘On exposed and embedded correction in conversation’. In Talk and Social Organization, edited by Button, J.; Lee J.R.E. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
2004 ‘Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction’. In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, edited by Lerner, G. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paoletti, I.
1998 ‘Handling “incoherence” according to the speaker’s on-sight categorization’. In Identities in Talk, edited by Antaki, C.; Widdicombe, S. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Perkins, L.
2003 ‘Negotiating repair in aphasic conversation’. In Conversation and Brain Damage, edited by Goodwin, C. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Picheny, M.; Durlach, N.; Braida, L.
1985 ‘Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech’. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 281: 96–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1986 ‘Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech’. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 291: 434–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.
1982 ‘Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of “uh huh” and other things that come between sentences’. In Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1981, edited by Tannen, D. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press. (pp. 71–93).Google Scholar
1995 ‘Sequence-closing sequences’. Sequence Organization. (Ms.) 186–200: Department of Sociology, UCLA.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.; Jefferson, G.; Sacks, H.
1977 ‘The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation’. Language 531: 361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skelt, L.
2006See What I Mean: Hearing Loss, Gaze and Repair in Conversation. PhD thesis, Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Ten Have, P.
1999Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Tye-Murray, N.; Witt, S.
1996 ‘Conversational moves and conversational styles of adult cochlear-implant users’. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology 291: 11–25.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

Barnes, Scott
2014. Managing Intersubjectivity in Aphasia. Research on Language and Social Interaction 47:2  pp. 130 ff. DOI logo
Barnes, Scott & Alison Ferguson
2015. Conversation partner responses to problematic talk produced by people with aphasia: some alternatives to initiating, completing, or pursuing repair. Aphasiology 29:3  pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Brouwer, Catherine E., Dennis Day, Ulrika Ferm, Anders R Hougaard, Gitte Rasmussen & Gunilla Thunberg
2011. Treating the actions of children as sensible. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 2:2  pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Chinn, Deborah
2022. ‘I Have to Explain to him’: How Companions Broker Mutual Understanding Between Patients with Intellectual Disabilities and Health Care Practitioners in Primary Care. Qualitative Health Research 32:8-9  pp. 1215 ff. DOI logo
Ekberg, Katie, Louise Hickson & Caitlin Grenness
2017. Conversation breakdowns in the audiology clinic: the importance of mutual gaze. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 52:3  pp. 346 ff. DOI logo
Lind, Christopher
2013. Conversation repair: Ecological validity of outcome measures in acquired hearing impairment. Cochlear Implants International 14:sup4  pp. 48 ff. DOI logo
Okell, Elise & Christopher Lind
2012. A conversation analytic view of continuous discourse tracking as a rehabilitative tool. International Journal of Audiology 51:1  pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
Saalasti, Satu, Kati Pajo, Barbara Fox, Seija Pekkala & Minna Laakso
2023. Embodied-Visual Practices during Conversational Repair: Scoping Review. Research on Language and Social Interaction 56:4  pp. 311 ff. DOI logo
Sparrow, Karen, Christopher Lind & Willem van Steenbrugge
2020. Gesture, communication, and adult acquired hearing loss. Journal of Communication Disorders 87  pp. 106030 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.