Cover not available
Article published In:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 33:2 (2010) ► pp.14.1–14.17

Applied linguistics in its disciplinary context

| University of South Australia
Australia’s current attempt to develop a process to evaluate the quality of research (Excellence in Research for Australia – ERA) places a central emphasis on the disciplinary organisation of academic work. This disciplinary focus poses particular problems for Applied Linguistics in Australia. This paper will examine Applied Linguistics in relation to this issue of discipline in two ways. First, it will examine ways in which Applied Linguistics has articulated for itself its disciplinary nature. In most formulations of the focus of Applied Linguistics, the emphasis has not been on identifying a discipline, but rather on identifying an area of focus. Such formulations necessarily cover a very diverse range of research methods, theories, etc. This approach can be seen as one of emphasising diversity and breadth within the field. Other attempts have been made to characterise Applied Linguistics in more discipline-like terms. Such broad characterisations however conceal a high degree of internal diversity. Applied Linguistics does not appear to be a ‘discipline’ but rather an interdisciplinary field of enquiry. Second, the paper will examine some possible implications of the diversity of Applied Linguistics for how it is positioned through the ERA process.
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 1 January 2010
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.2104/aral1014
References
Appadurai, Arjun
(1996) Diversity and disciplinarity as cultural artefacts. In Cary Nelson and Dilip Parameshwar Gaonkar (Eds), Disciplinarity and dissent in cultural studies (pp. 23–36). New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Australian Research Council (ARC)
(2008) ERA indicator principles. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Becher, Tony
(1989) Academic tribes and territories: intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Milton Keynes, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Roger T.
(1981) An introduction to Applied Linguistics: approaches and methods in language teaching. London: Batsford Academic and Educational.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre
(1982) Langage et pouvoir symbolique. Paris: Arthème-Fayard.Google Scholar
Bourguignon, André
(2001) De la pluridisciplinarité a la transdisciplinarité Bulletin interactif du CIRET (Centre International de Recherches et Études Transdisciplinaires, 151, 120–127.Google Scholar
Brumfit, Christopher
(1997) Theoretical practice: Applied linguistics as pure and practical science. AILA Review, 121, 18–30.Google Scholar
Cook, Guy
(2002) Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, Vivian
(2006) What is applied linguistics? In Vivian Cook (Ed.), Obscure Writings. Retrieved 4 November, 2009, from [URL].
Corder, Stephen Pitt
(1973) Introducing Applied Linguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Davies, Alan
(2007) An introduction to Applied Linguistics: from practice to theory (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel
(1975) Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Geiger, Roger
(1986) To advance knowledge: the growth of the American research universities, 1900–1940. New York: Oxford Univeristy Press.Google Scholar
Gieryn, Thomas
(1983) Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(8), 781–795. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grabe, William
(2002) Applied linguistics: an emerging discipline for the twentieth century. In Robert B. Kaplan (Ed.), Oxford handbook of Applied Linguistics (pp. 3–12). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jencks, Christopher; Riesman, David
(1968) The academic revolution. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Robert B.
(2002) Preface. In Robert B. Kaplan (Ed.), Oxford handbook of Applied Linguistics (pp. v–x). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kramsch, Claire
(2000) Second language acquisition, applied linguistics, and the teaching of foreign languages. Modern Language Journal, 84(3), 311–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonough, Steven
(2002) Applied Linguistics in language education. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Murray, Neil; Crichton, Jonathan
(2009) What’s in a name? Degree programs and what they tell us about ‘applied linguistics’ in Australia. Paper presented at the RCLC Symposium: Applied Linguistics in Australia.
Parker, Jan
(2002) A new disciplinarity: communities of knowledge, learning and practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 7(4), 373–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair
(2001) Critical Applied Linguistics: a critical introduction. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2004) Critical applied linguistics. In Alan Davies and Catherine Elder (Eds), The Handbook of Applied Linguistics (Vols. 784–807). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pink, Brian; Bascand, Geoff
(2008) Australian and New Zealand standard research classification (ANZSRC). Retrieved 27 October, 2009, from [URL].
Rampton, Ben
(1997) Retuning in applied linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 3–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant; van Leeuwen, Theo
(2003) Applied linguistics and communities of practice: Gaining communality or losing autonomy? In Srikant Sarangi and Theo van Leeuwen (Eds), Applied Linguistics and communities of practice (pp. 1–8). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Shumway, David; Messer, Ell;, Ell; Davidow, Ell
(1991) Disciplinarity: an introduction. Poetics Today, 12(2), 201–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spolsky, Bernard
(1978) Educational linguistics: an introduction. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(2005) Is language policy applied linguistics? In Paul Bruthiaux, Dwight Atkinson, William G. Eggington, William Grabe and Vaidehi Ramanathan (Eds), Directions in Applied Linguistics (pp. 26–36). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Swales, John
(1992) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Véronique, G.
(2009) La transformation des concepts, d’un environnement linguistique et d’un contexte national à un autre. Français dans le monde, 461, 18–32.Google Scholar
Widdowson, Henry G.
(2005) Applied linguistics, interdisciplinarity, and disparate realities. In Paul Bruthiaux, Dwight Atkinson, William G. Eggington, William Grabe and Vaidehi Ramanathan (Eds), Directions in Applied Linguistics (pp. 12–25). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Curnow, Timothy Jowan & Michelle Kohler
2017. Applied linguistics research in Australia as represented through ARAL. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 40:3 ► pp. 311 ff. DOI logo
Riazi, Mehdi, Heather Cooper & Grai Calvey
2022. Journal publication productivity, impact, and quality among Applied Linguistics and TESOL academics in the Group of Eight Australian Universities. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 45:1 ► pp. 98 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.