Article published in:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 34:2 (2011) ► pp. 127147

Full-text

Processability approach to Arabic L2 teaching and syllabus design
References

References

Al Shatter, G.
(2007) Implementation and evaluation of new learning approach in Arabic: Implications for translator training. Translation Watch Quarterly, 3 (1), 94–119.Google Scholar
(2008) The development of verbal structures in L2 Arabic. In J.-U. Kessler, (Ed.), Processability approaches to second language sevelopment and second language learning (pp. 267–299). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Pub.Google Scholar
(2010) Acquisition and development of nominal and verbal structures in Arabic: Agreement morphology in second language acquisition. Saarbrücken: VDM, Verlag Dr. Müller.Google Scholar
Cook, M.
(2006) The multidimentional model, processability pheory and the peachability/learnability hypothesis: Suggestions for the Japanese context. Journal of the Faculty of Global Communication, Siebold University of Negasaki, 7, 1–7.Google Scholar
Dekeyser, R.
(2003) Implicit and explicit learning. Malden, MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Di Biase, B.
(Ed.) (2002a) Developing a second language: Acquisition, processing and pedagogy of Arabic, Chinese, English, Italian, Japanese, Swedish. Melbourne: Language Australia.Google Scholar
(2002b) Focusing strategies in second language development: A classroom-based study of Italian L2 in primary school. In B. Di Biase, (Ed.), Developing a second Language: acquisition, processing and pedagogy of Arabic, Chinese, English, Italian, Japanese, Swedish (pp. 95–120). Melbourne: Language Australia.Google Scholar
Di Biase, B. & Kawaguchi, S.
(2002) Exploring the typological plausibility of processability theory: language development in Italian second language and Japanese second language. Second Language Research, 18 (3), 272–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. J.
(2003) Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(1990) Instructed second language acquisition: Learning in the classroom. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1999) Learning a second language through interaction. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. M. & Selinker, L.
(1994) Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Hillsdal, New Jersey Hove and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Håkansson, G.
(2002) Learning and teaching of Swedish: a Processability perspective. In B. Di Biase (Ed.), Developing a second language: Acquisition, processing and pedagogy of Arabic, Chinese, English, Italian, Japanese, Swedish (Vol. 10) (pp. 7–16). Melbourne: Language Australia.Google Scholar
Kawaguchi, S.
(2002) Grammatical development in learning of Japanese as a second language. In B. Di Biase (Ed.), Developing a second language: Acquisition, processing and pedagogy of Arabic, Chinese, English, Italian, Japanese, Swedish (Vol. 10) (pp. 17–29). Melbourne: Language Australia.Google Scholar
(2005) Argument structure and syntactic development in Japanese as a second language. In M. Pienemann, (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory (pp. 253–298). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. & Long, M. H.
(1991) An introduction to second language acquisition research. London; New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Lenzing, A.
(2008) Teachability and learnability: An analysis of primary school textbooks. In J. KeBler (Ed.), Processability approaches to second language development and second language learning (pp. 221–241). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Long, M. H.
(1988) Instructed interlanguage development. In L. M. Beebe, (Ed.), Issues in second language acquisition: Multiple perspectives (pp. 115–141). New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Lowie, W. & Verspoor, M.
(2004) Input versus transfer? - the role of frequency and similarity in the acquisition of L2 preposition. In M. Achardand & S. Niemeier, (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp. 77–93). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Macaro, E.
(2003) Teaching and learning a second language: A review of recent research. London; New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Mansouri, F.
(1997) From emergence to acquisition: Developmental issues in agreement marking among Australian learners of Arabic. The Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 20 (1), 83–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999a) Interlanguage syntax in Arabic as a second language: A processability theory perspective. Languages and Linguistics, 4, 45–71.Google Scholar
(1999b) The acquisition of Arabic as a second language: From theory to practice. Sydney: University of Western Sydney, Macarthur.Google Scholar
(2005) Agreement morphology in Arabic as a second language: Typological features and their processing implications. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory (pp. 117–154). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2007) Second language acquisition research: Theory-construction and testing. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholar Press.Google Scholar
Mansouri, F. & Håkansson, G.
(2007) Intra-stage developmental order: Empirical evidence from Arabic and Swedish as second languages. In F. Mansouri, (Ed.), Second language acquisition research: Theory-construction and testing (pp. 95–118). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholar Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, S. & Yip, V.
(2003) Relative clauses in early bilingual development: Transfer and universals. In A. Giacalone Ramat, (Ed.), Typology and second language acquisition (pp. 39–81). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B.
(1987) Theories of second language learning. London; New York: Arnold, Edward.Google Scholar
(1990) “Conscious” versus “unconscious” learning. TESOL Quarterly, 24 (4), 617–634. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, H. L.
(1997) On acquisition order of agreement procedures in Arabic learner language. Al-Arabiyya, 30, 49–95.Google Scholar
Odlin, T.
(2003) Cross-linguistic influence. Malden: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(1989) Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 10 (1), 52–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005a) An introduction to processability theory. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory (pp. ix–60). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2005b) Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rivers, W. M.
(1991) Psychological validation of methodological approaches and foreign language classroom practices. In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Foreign language acquisition research and the classroom (pp. 283–294). Lexington; Massachusetts; Toronto: D. C. Heath and Company.Google Scholar
Robinson, P.
(2001) Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ur, P.
(1996) A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y.
(2005) Processing and formal Instruction in the L2 acquisition of five Chinese grammatical morphemes. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory (pp. 155–177). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

No author info given
2017.  In Understanding Second Language Processing [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 4], Crossref logo
Oliver, Rhonda, Honglin Chen & Stephen Moore
2016. Review of selected research in applied linguistics published in Australia (2008–2014). Language Teaching 49:4  pp. 513 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.