Cover not available
Article published In:
Describing School Achievement in Asian Languages for Diverse Learner Groups
Edited by Angela Scarino and Catherine Elder
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 35:3] 2012
► pp. 231–250

A rationale for acknowledging the diversity of learner achievements in learning particular languages in school education in Australia

| Research Centre for Languages & Cultures, University of South Australia
In school languages education in Australia at present there is an increasing diversity of languages and learners learning particular languages that results from a greater global movement of students. This diversity builds on a long-established profile of diversity that reflects the migration history of Australia. It stands in sharp contrast to the force of standardisation in education in general and in the history of the development of state and national frameworks for the learning of languages K-12 in Australia and indeed beyond. These frameworks have characteristically generalised across diverse languages, diverse learner groups and diverse program conditions, in particular, the amount of time made available for language learning. In addition, in the absence of empirical studies of learner achievements in learning particular languages over time, the development of such frameworks has drawn primarily on internationally available language proficiency descriptions [such as the American Council for the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL), the International Second Language Proficiency Rating Scale (ISLPR), and more recently the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR)] that were developed primarily to serve reporting and credentialing rather than learning purposes.
Drawing on a description of the current context of linguistic and cultural diversity and on a brief characterisation of the history of curriculum and assessment framework development for the languages area, I provide a rationale for acknowledging in the development and use of frameworks (i.e. descriptions of achievements) the diversity of languages that comprise the languages learning area in Australia and, in particular, the diverse learner groups who come to their learning with diverse experiences of learning and using particular languages. The Student Achievement in Asian Languages Education (SAALE) study provides an example of the development of descriptions of achievement that are sensitive to these dimensions of context. I discuss the rationale for such context-sensitive descriptions in relation to their potential purposes and uses at the language policy and planning and educational systems level, at the teaching and learning level, and in ongoing research.
Keywords: language learner achievements, Asian languages, linguistic and cultural diversity, community/heritage languages
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 1 January 2012
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.35.3.01sca
References (49)
Australasian Curriculum, AssessmentCertification Authorities (ACACA) (1991). National Assessment Framework for Languages at Senior Secondary Level (NAFLSSL). Hosted by the Senior Secondary Assessment Board of South Australia, [URL].
(2001). The Collaborative Curriculum and Assessment Framework for Languages (CCAFL). Hosted by the Senior Secondary Assessment Board of South Australia, [URL].
Bachman, L. & Palmer, A. (2010). Language assessment in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ball, S. (2000). Performativities and fabrications in the education economy: towards a performative society? Australian Educational Researcher, 27(2), 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Board of Studies of Victoria. (1995). Curriculum and Standards Framework – Languages other than English (CSF). Melbourne. Board of Studies of Victoria.Google Scholar
Breen, M.P., Barratt-Pugh, C., Derewianka, B., House, H., Hudson, C., Lumley, T. & Rohl, M. (1997). Profiling ESL children. How teachers interpret and use national and state assessment frameworks [Vol.11]. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs.Google Scholar
Brinton, D.M., Kagan, O. & Bauckus, S. (Eds). (2008). Heritage language education. A new field emerging. New York. Routledge.Google Scholar
Clyne, M. (1991). Community languages. The Australian experience. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Australia’s language potential. Sydney: University of NSW Press.Google Scholar
Cook, G. (2010). Translation in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR): Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Curriculum Corporation of Australia (1994). Languages other than English: a curriculum profile for Australian schools. Melbourne: Curriculum Corporation.Google Scholar
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. National Asian Languages and Studies in Schools Program (NALSSP). (n.d.).Retrieved 25 March 2012, from [URL].
Elder, C. (2000a). Learner diversity and its implications for outcomes-based assessment. In C. Elder (Ed.) Defining standards and monitoring progress in languages other than English. Guest edited issue of the Australian Review of Applied Linguistics , 23(2), 36–61.Google Scholar
(2000b). Outing the ‘native speaker’: The problem of diverse learner backgrounds in foreign language classrooms. Language, Curriculum and Culture, 13(1): 86–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elder, C., Kim, H. & Knoch, U. (this issue). Documenting the diversity of learner achievements in Asian languages using common measures.
Fulcher, G. (2008). Evaluating language quality. In E. Shohamy & N.H. Hornberger (Eds) Encyclopaedia of language and education: Language testing and assessment, 71, 157–176.Google Scholar
Garcia, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century. A global perspective. Chichester, West Sussex. Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hill, K., Iwashita, N., McNamara, T., Scarino, A., & Scrimgeour, A. (2004). A report on assessing student outcomes in Asian languages (Japanese and Indonesian). Report to the Australian Government Department of Education, Science and Training.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J.H. (2011). Language proficiency in native and nonnative speakers: an agenda for research and suggestions for second-language assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 81, 229–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inbar-Lourie, O. (2008). Constructing a language assessment knowledge base: A focus on language assessment courses. Language Testing, 25(3), 385–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, R. (2000). Context-sensitive assessment of modern languages in primary (elementary) and early secondary education: Scotland and the European experience. Language Testing, 17(2), 123–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2006). From communicative competence to symbolic competence. Modern Language Journal, 901, 249–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). The multilingual subject. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. & Frawley, L. (1992). Proficiency: understanding the construct. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10(2), 181–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leung, C. & Lewkowicz, J. (2008). Assessing diverse populations. In E. Shohamy & N.H. Hornberger (Eds). Encyclopedia of language and education. Volume 7. Language testing and assessment (2nd ed.) (pp. 301–317). New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leung, C. & Rea-Dickins, P. (2007). Teacher assessment as policy instrument: contradictions and capacities. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4(1), 6–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lo Bianco, J. (2010). The struggle to retain diversity in languages education. In A.J. Liddicoat and A. Scarino (Eds). Languages in Australian education: problems, prospects and future directions (pp. 97–108). Newcastle Upon Tyne. Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
(2009). Second languages and Australian schooling. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Luke, A. (2011). Generalizing across borders: policy and the limits of educational science. Educational Researcher, 40(8), 367–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macqueen, S., Harding, L. & Elder, C. (2011). Investigating the validity of the ESL VELS student data (Final report). Melbourne: Language Testing Research Centre.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. & Elder, C. (2010). Beyond scales. In A.J. Liddicoat and A. Scarino (Eds). Languages in Australian education: problems, prospects and future directions (pp. 193–202). Newcastle Upon Tyne. Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
McKay, P. (1992). ESL Development: language and literacy in schools project. Volumes 1 and 21, National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia: Melbourne, Victoria.Google Scholar
(2005). Research into the assessment of school age language learners. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 251, 243–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Assessing young language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mercurio, A. & Scarino, A. (2005). Heritage languages at upper secondary level in South Australia: A struggle for legitimacy. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 8, 2 & 3, 145–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ministerial Council on Education, EmploymentTraining and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA) 2008. Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians. Melbourne. MCEETYA. Retrieved 25 March, 2012, from [URL].
Nicholas, H. (2000). Is there progress in standards? Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 79–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orton, J. (2008). The current state of Chinese language education in Australian schools. Melbourne: Education Services Australia.Google Scholar
Peyton, J.K., Ranard, D. A. & McGinnis, S. (Eds.) (2001). Heritage languages in America. McHenry, IL: Centre for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems Co.Google Scholar
Scarino, A. (1995). Language scales and language tests: development in Languages other than English. Melbourne Papers in Language Testing, 4(2), 30–42.Google Scholar
(2008). The role of assessment in policy-making for languages education in Australian schools: a struggle for legitimacy and diversity. Current Issues in Language Planning, 9(3), 344–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Language and languages in the curriculum. In A.J. Liddicoat and A. Scarino (eds). Languages in Australian education: problems, prospects and future directions (pp. 157–178). Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Scarino, A., Elder, C., Iwashita, N., Kim, S. H. O., Kohler, M. & Scrimgeour, A. (2011). Student achievement in Asian languages education. Part 1: Project Report. Report prepared for the Department of Education, Employment & Workplace Relations (DEEWR). Available from [URL].
Scarino, A., Vale, D., McKay, P., & Clark. J. (1989). The Australian Language Levels (ALL) Guidelines. Canberra. Curriculum Development Centre.Google Scholar
Spolsky, B. (2008). Historical and future perspective. In E. Shohamy & N.H. Hornberger (Eds). Encyclopedia of language and education. Volume 7: Language testing and assessment (2nd ed.) (pp. 445–454). New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stroud, C. & Heugh, K. (2011). Languages in education. In R. Mesthrie (ed). Cambridge handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 413–429). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stroud, C. & Wee, L. (2010). Language policy and planning in Singaporean late modernity. In L. Lim, A. Pakir & L. Wee. (Eds) English in Singapore: modernity and management (pp. 181–204). Singapore: NUS Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Ohi, Sarah & Paia Ingram
2022. Preparing I-Kiribati for the future: probing the English language research-policy nexus in Kiribati education in the South Pacific. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 42:3 ► pp. 478 ff. DOI logo
Leung, Constant & Angela Scarino
2016. Reconceptualizing the Nature of Goals and Outcomes in Language/s Education. The Modern Language Journal 100:S1 ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Normand-Marconnet, Nadine & Joseph Lo Bianco
2015. The Common European Framework of Reference down under: A survey of its use and non-use in Australian universities. Language Learning in Higher Education 5:2 DOI logo
Scarino, Angela
2014. Recognising the Diversity of Learner Achievements in Learning Asian Languages in School Education Settings. In Dynamic Ecologies [Multilingual Education, 9], ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Willoughby, Louisa
2014. Meeting the challenges of heritage language education: lessons from one school community. Current Issues in Language Planning 15:3 ► pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Willoughby, Louisa
2016. High Stakes Assessment of Heritage Languages: The Case of the Victorian Certificate of Education. In Handbook of Comparative Studies on Community Colleges and Global Counterparts [Springer International Handbooks of Education, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Willoughby, Louisa
2018. High Stakes Assessment of Heritage Languages: The Case of the Victorian Certificate of Education. In Handbook of Research and Practice in Heritage Language Education [Springer International Handbooks of Education, ], ► pp. 429 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.