Article published In:
Australian Review of Applied LinguisticsVol. 36:1 (2013) ► pp.52–70
L2 vocabulary knowledge in and out of context
Is it the same for reading and listening?
The vast majority of second language (L2) vocabulary research focuses on learners’ knowledge of isolated word forms. However, it is unclear to what extent this knowledge can be used as an indicator of knowledge in context (i.e. reading and listening). This study aims to shed light on this issue by comparing ESL learners’ knowledge of the meaning of isolated words (‘decontextual knowledge’) with their knowledge of the same words in both reading and listening (‘contextual knowledge’). Decontextual knowledge was measured in a free recall interview. Contextual knowledge was measured through a task in which participants paraphrased sentences containing the target items from both a written and spoken narrative. Results showed that learners’ decontextual and contextual knowledge agreed in 65% of the cases. This indicates a considerable gap between the two, and emphasises that scores on decontextualised vocabulary test should not be used as predictors of learners’ vocabulary knowledge in context. In addition, learners demonstrated significantly better knowledge of word meaning in the reading than listening mode, which may be due to processing difficulties in listening as well as better inferencing opportunities in reading. Two additional factors found to affect both decontextual and contextual knowledge are word frequency and learners’ vocabulary size.
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].
References (40)
Broersma, M. & Cutler, A. (2008). Phantom word activation in L2. System, 361, 22–34. 
Buck, G. (2001). Assessing Listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cai, W. & Lee, B. P.H. (2010). Investigating the effect of contextual clues on the processing of unfamiliar words in second language listening comprehension. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 331, 1–28.
Cobb, T. (n.d.). Web Vocabprofile. Retrieved April 3, 2012, from [URL], an adaptation of Heatley and Nation’s (1994) Range.
Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 241, 143–188.
Field, J. (2008). Revising segmentation hypotheses in first and second language listening. System, 361, 35–51.
Goh, C. C. M. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 281, 55–75.
Haynes, M. (1993). Patterns and perils of guessing in second language reading. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 46–66). Norwood: Ablex.
Heatley, A. & Nation, P. (1994). Range. Victoria University of Wellington, NZ.[Computer program, available at [URL].
Hirsh, D. (2010). Researching vocabulary. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti, (Eds.), Continuum companion to research methods in Applied Linguistics (pp. 222–239). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Huckin, T. & Bloch, J. (1993). Strategies for inferring word meaning in context: a cognitive model. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 153–180). Norwood: Ablex.
Hu, H.-C. M. & Nation, P. (2000). Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language 131, 403–430.
Laufer, B. & Nation, P. (1999). A vocabulary–size test of controlled productive vocabulary. Language Testing, 161, 33–51.
Lund, R. J. (1991). A comparison of second language listening and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 751, 196–204.
Meara, P. (1992). EFL vocabulary tests. Swansea: Center for Applied Language Studies, University of Wales Swansea.
Mecartty, F. H. (2000). Lexical and grammatical knowledge in reading and listening comprehension by foreign language learners of Spanish. Applied Language Learning, 111, 323–348.
Milton, J. (2009). Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Milton, J. & Hopkins, N. (2006). Comparing phonological and orthographic vocabulary size: Do vocabulary tests underestimate the knowledge of some learners? Canadian Modern Language Review, 631, 127–147.
Nation, P. (1983). Testing and teaching vocabulary. Guidelines, 51, 12–24.
(1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
(2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review 631, 59–81.
(2007). Fundamental issues in modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge. In H. Daller, J. Milton & J. Treffers-Daller, (Eds.), Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge (pp. 35–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2008). Teaching vocabulary: Strategies and techniques. Boston: Heinle.
Nation, P. & Gu, P.Y. (2007). Focus on vocabulary. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
Park, G.-P. (2004). Comparison of L2 listening and reading comprehension by University students learning English in Korea. Foreign Language Annals, 371, 448–458.
Qian, D. D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 561, 283–307.
(2005). Demystifying lexical inferencing: The role of aspects of vocabulary knowledge. TESL Canada Journal, 221, 34–54.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2004). Plumbing the depths: How should the construct of vocabulary knowledge be defined? In P. Bogaards & B. Laufer, (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition and testing (pp. 209–228). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2007). Second language vocabulary assessment: Current practices and new directions. International Journal of English Studies, 71, 105–125.
Read, J. & Chapelle, C.A. (2001). A framework for second language vocabulary assessment. Language Testing, 181, 1–32.
Reves, T. & Levine, A. (1988). The FL receptive skills: Same or different? System, 161, 327–336.
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D. & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 181, 55–88.
Schoonen, R. (2011). How language ability is assessed. In E. Hinkel, (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. II1) (pp. 701–716). London: Routledge.
Stæhr, L. S. (2008). Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading and writing. The Language Learning Journal, 361, 139–152.
Vandergrift, L. (2011). Second langauge listening: Presage, process, product and pedagogy. In E. Hinkel, (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. II1) (pp. 455–471). London: Routledge.
van Zeeland, H. & Schmitt, N. (2012). Lexical coverage and L1 and L2 listening comprehension: The same or different from reading comprehension? Applied Linguistics. Advance Access published December 18, 2012, .
.Weber, A. & Cutler, A. (2004). Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 501, 1–25.
Wesche, M. B. & Paribakht, T.S. (2010). Lexical inferencing in a first and second language: Cross–linguistic dimensions. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Dudley, Amber & Emma Marsden
2024. The lexical content of high‐stakes national exams in French, German, and Spanish in England. Foreign Language Annals 57:2 ► pp. 311 ff. 
Zeng, Jie
2024. International intelligibility of English spoken by college students in the Bashu dialect area of China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11:1
Kim, Young Ae, Tim Stoeckel & Stuart McLean
2023. Can Japanese learners of English comprehend inflectional and derivational forms in listening? Testing the validity of the word family counting unit. The Modern Language Journal 107:3 ► pp. 819 ff.
Marsden, Emma, Amber Dudley & Rachel Hawkes
2023. Use of word lists in a high‐stakes, low‐exposure context: Topic‐driven or frequency‐informed. The Modern Language Journal 107:3 ► pp. 669 ff.
Mister, Bianca, Honglin Chen & Amanda Baker
Teng, Mark Feng & Atsushi Mizumoto
2023. The role of spoken vocabulary knowledge in language minority students’ incidental vocabulary learning from captioned television. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 46:2 ► pp. 253 ff.
Carney, Nathaniel
2021. Diagnosing L2 Listeners’ Difficulty Comprehending Known Lexis. TESOL Quarterly 55:2 ► pp. 536 ff.
van Zeeland, Hilde
2017. Christopher Brumfit Thesis Award Winner 2014 – Hilde van Zeeland: Four studies on vocabulary knowledge in and from listening: Findings and implications for future research. Language Teaching 50:1 ► pp. 143 ff.
Oliver, Rhonda, Honglin Chen & Stephen Moore
2016. Review of selected research in applied linguistics published in Australia (2008–2014). Language Teaching 49:4 ► pp. 513 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.