Article published in:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 37:2 (2014) ► pp. 75100

Full-text

Dynamic development of complexity and accuracy
References

References

Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K.
(2011) Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R.
(1973) A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H., Maxim, H. H., & Norris, J. M.
(2010) Realizing advanced foreign language writing development in collegiate dducation: Curricular design, pedagogy, assessment [Monograph] The Modern Language Journal, 94(Supplement S1), 1–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caspi, T., & Lowie, W.
(2010) A dynamic perspective on L2 lexical development in academic English. In R. Chacón-Beltrán, C. Abello-Contesse, & M. d. M. Torreblanca-López (Eds.), Insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning (pp. 41–60). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cooper, T.
(1976) Measuring written syntactic patterns of second language learners of German. Journal of Educational Research, 69(5), 176–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe
(2001) Common European Framework of Reference for language learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cumming, A.
(Ed.) (2006) Goals for academic writing: ESL students and their instructors. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Bot, K.
(2008) Introduction: Second language development as a dynamic process. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2),166–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Bot, K., Chan, H., Lowie, W., Plat, R., & Verspoor, M. H.
(2012) A dynamic perspective on language processing and development. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 188–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Bot, K., & Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2011) Researching second language development from a dynamic systems theory perspective. In M. H. Verspoor, K. de Bot & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic systems approach to second language development (pp. 5–23). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Bot, K., & Lowie, W.
(2010) On the stability of representations in the multilingual lexicon. In M. Pütz & L. Sicola (Eds.), Cognitive processing in second language acquisition (pp. 117–133). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., Thorne, S. L., & Verspoor, M.
(2013) Dynamic Systems Theory as a comprehensive theory of second language development. In M. G. Mayo, M. G. Mangado, & M. M. Adrián (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 199–220). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. H.
(2005) Second language acquisition: An advanced resource book. Oxon: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Bot, K., Verspoor, M. H., & Lowie, W.
(2005) Dynamic systems theory and applied linguistics: The ultimate “so what”? International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 116–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. & Barkhuizen, G.
(2005) Analysing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ferrari, S.
(2012) A longitudinal study of complexity, accuracy, and fluency variation in second language development. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 277–297). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flahive, D., & Snow, B.
(1980) Measures of syntactic complexity in evaluating ESL compositions. In J. Oller & K. Perkins (Eds.), Research in language testing (pp. 171–176). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Ho-Peng, L.
(1983) Using T–unit measures to assess writing proficiency of ESL students. RELC Journal, 14(2), 35–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Housen, A. & Kuiken, F.
(2009) Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461–473. doi: 10.1093/applin/amp048Google Scholar
Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
(2012) Complexity, accuracy, and fluency: Definitions, measurement and research. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, K.
(1965) Grammatical structures written at three grade levels (NCTE Research Report No. 3). Urbana, IL: The National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
(1970) Syntactic maturity in schoolchildren and adults. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 35(1), 1–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K.
(2003) Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ingvarsdóttir, H. & Arnbjörnsdóttir, B.
(2013) ELF and academic writing: A perspective from the Expanding Circle. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 2(1), 123–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, W.
(2013) Measurements of development in L2 written production: The case of L2 Chinese. Applied Linguistics, 34(1), 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, M. & Sankey, D.
(2009) Towards a Dynamic Systems Approach to moral development and moral education: A response to the JME special issue, September 2008 Journal of Moral Education, 38(3), 283–298. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) The dynamics of emergent self–organization: Reconceptualizing child development in teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(4), 79–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D.
(1976) Evidence of the need for a second language acquisition index of development. In W. Ritchie (Ed.), Second language acquisition research: Issues and implications (pp. 127–136). New York: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
(1978) An ESL index of development. TESOL Quarterly, 12(4), 439–448. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997) Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Language acquisition and language use from a Chaos/Complexity theory perspective. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization (pp. 33–46). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2006) The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Adjusting expectations: The study of complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 579–589. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) The dynamic co–adaptation of cognitive and social views: A complexity thoery perspective. In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning (pp. 40–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2011) A complexity theory approach to second language development/acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 48–72). London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2012) Complex, dynamic systems: A new transdisciplinary theme for applied linguistics. Language Teaching, 45(2), 202–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L.
(2008) Research methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 200–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Storm, V.
(1977) The construction of a second language acquisition index of development. Language Learning, 27(1), 123–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leki, I.
(2011) Learning to write in a second language: Multilingual graduates and undergraduates expanding genre repertoires. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 85–110). Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leki, I., Cumming, A., & Silva, T.
(2008) A synthesis of research on second language writing in English (Vol. Routledge): New York.Google Scholar
Levkina, M., & Gilabert, R.
(2012) The effects of cognitive task complexity on L2 oral production. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 171–197). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J.
(2006) Professional academic writing by multilingual scholars: Interactions with literacy brokers in the production of English-medium texts. Written Communication, 26(1) 3–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M.
(2014, March). Variability and learning mechanisms. In K. de Bot & D. Larsen-Freeman (Chair), From universality to variability in second language development. Colloquium conducted at the meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics 2014, Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar
Lowie, W., Verspoor, M., & de Bot, K.
(2009) A dynamic view of second language development across the lifespan. In K. de Bot & R. W. Schrauf (Eds.), Language development over the lifespan (pp. 125–145). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lu, X.
(2011) A corpus–based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development. TESOL Quarterly, 445(1), 36–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M.
(Ed.) (2012) L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives. Boston/Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, S., Ryan, S., & Williams, M.
(2012) Conclusion: Final Remarks. In S. Mercer, S. Ryan & M. Williams (Eds.), Psychology for language learning: Insights from research, theory, and practice (pp. 239–247). Hamsphire: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myles, F.
(2012) Complexity, accuracy, and fluency: The role played by formulaic sequences in early interlanguage development. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 71–93). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.
(2009) Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L.
(2003) Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college‐level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 492–518. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Overton, W. F., & Lerner, R. M.
(2014) Fundamental concepts and methods in Developmental Science: A relational perspective. Research in Human Development, 11(1), 63–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pallotti, G.
(2009) CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 590–601. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S.
(2007) Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language: A handbook for supervisors. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Polat, B., & Kim, Y.
(2013) Dynamics of complexity and accuracy: A longitudinal case study of advanced untutored development. Applied Linguistics, 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richard, J. C., & Renandya, W. A.
(2002) Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silva, T.
(1997) Differences in ESL and Native–English–Speaker writing: The research and its implications. In C. Severino, J. Guena & J. Butler (Eds.), Writing in multicultural settings (pp. 209–219). New York: Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
Silva, T., & Reichelt, M.
(2003) Second language writing up close and personal: some success stories. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 93–114). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P.
(1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2009) Modeling second language development: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P.
(1999) The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis in task–based performances: A meta–analysis of the Ealing research. In S. V. Daele, A. Housen, F. Kuiken, M. Pierrard & I. Vedder (Eds.), Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language use, learning and teaching (pp. 207–226). Brussels: Contactforum.Google Scholar
(2012) Complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis in task–based performance: A synthesis of the Ealing research. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in SLA (pp. 199–220). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, N. V.
(1973) The acquisition of phonology: A case study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spoelman, M., & Verspoor, M.
(2010) Dynamic patterns in development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study in the acquisition of Finnish. Applied Linguistics, 31(1), 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thewissen, J.
(2013) Capturing L2 accuracy developmental patterns: Insights from an error–tagged EFL learner corpus. The Modern Language Journal, 97(S1), 77–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, M., & van Geert, P.
(2007) Wobbles, humps and sudden jumps: A case study of continuity, discontinuity and variability in early language development. Infant and Child Development, 16(1), 7–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, M., Verspoor, M. H., & Lowie, W.
(2011) Variability and DST. In M. H. Verspoor, K. de Bot & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 55–84). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Geert, P.
(2008) The dynamic systems approach in the study of L1 and L2 acquisition: An introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 179–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009a) A comprehensive dynamic systems theory of language development. In K. de Bot & R. W. Schrauf (Eds.), Language development over the lifespan (pp. 60–104). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2009b) Nonlinear complex dynamical systems in developmental psychology. In S. J. Guastello, M. Koopmans & D. Pincus (Eds.), Chaos and complexity in psychology: The theory of nonlinear dynamical systems (pp. 242–281). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2011) The contribution of Complex Dynamic Systems to Development. Child Development Perspectives, 5(4), 273–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Dynamic Systems. In B. Lauren, T. Little, & N. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 725–741). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
(2014, March). L2 acquisition and the study of change in complex systems. In K. de Bot & D. Larsen-Freeman (Chair), From universality to variability in second language development. Colloquium conducted at the meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics 2014, Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar
van Geert, P., Steenbeek, H., & van Dijk, M.
(2011) A dynamic model of expert-novice co-adaptation during language learning and acquisition. In M. S. Schmid & W. Lowie (Eds.), Modelling bilingualism: From structure to chaos: In honor of Kees de Bot. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Geert, P., & van Dijk, M.
(2002) Focus on variability: New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data. Infant Behaviour and Development, 25, 340–374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Ambiguity in child language: The problem of inter-observer reliability in ambiguous observation data. First Language, 23(3), 259–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M. H., & Behrens, H.
(2011) Dynamic systems theory and a usage–based approach to second language development. In M. H. Verspoor, K. de Bot & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 25–38). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M. H., de Bot, K., & Lowie, W.
(2004) Dynamic Systems Theory and variation: A case study in L2 writing. In H. Aertsen, M. Hannay & R. Lyall (Eds.), Words in their places: A festschrift for J. Lachlan Mackenzie (pp. 407–421). Amsterdam: Department of English Language and Culture, Vrije Universiteit.Google Scholar
Verspoor, M. H., de Bot, K., & Xu, X.
(2011) The role of input and scholastic aptitude in second language development. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen, 86, 47–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M. H., Lowie, W., & de Bot, K.
(2009) Input and second language development from a dynamic perspective. In T. Piske & M. Young–Scholten (Eds.), Input matters in SLA. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Verspoor, M. H., Lowie, W., & van Dijk, M.
(2008) Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 214–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M. H., & Sauter, K.
(2000) English sentence analysis: An introductory course. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M. H., Schmid, M. S., & Xu, X.
(2012) A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(3), 239–263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M. H., Smiskova, H.
(2012) Foreign language writing development form a dynamic usage based perspective. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 17–46). Boston/Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M. H., & van Dijk, M.
(2011) Visualizing interactions between variables. In M. H. Verspoor, K. de Bot & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 85–98). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vyatkina, N.
(2012) The development of second language writing complexity in groups and individuals: A longitudinal learner corpus study. The Modern Language Journal, 96(4), 576–598. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Specific syntactic complexity: Developmental profiling of individuals based on an annotated learner corpus. The Modern Language Journal, 97(S1), 11–30. Crossref.Google Scholar
Witherington, D. C.
(2007) The Dynamic Systems Approach as metatheory for Developmental Psychology. Human Development, 50, 127–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H.-Y.
(1998) Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. Manoa: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawai’i.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Hepford, Elizabeth
2020.  In Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and L2 Writing Development [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 54],  pp. 161 ff. Crossref logo
Khomeijani Farahani, Ali Akbar, Abbas Ali Rezaee & Robabeh Moshtaghi Zonouz
2020. Exploring the Development of Writing Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency in Relation to the Motivational Trajectories: a Dynamically-Oriented Case Study. English Teaching & Learning 44:1  pp. 81 ff. Crossref logo
Lahuerta Martínez, Ana Cristina
2018. Analysis of syntactic complexity in secondary education EFL writers at different proficiency levels. Assessing Writing 35  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Wang, Zehua, Feifei Han & Filomena Papa
2021. Developing English language learners’ oral production with a digital game-based mobile application. PLOS ONE 16:1  pp. e0232671 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.