Article published in:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 37:2 (2014) ► pp. 101122


Investigating teachers’ written corrective feedback practices in a Saudi EFL context


Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U.
(2010) Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(4), 207–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casanave, C. P.
(2003) Looking ahead to more sociopolitically–oriented case study research in L2 writing scholarship: (But should it be called “post–process”?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 85–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diab, R. L.
(2005) EFL university students’ preferences for error correction and teacher feedback on writing. TESL Reporter, 38(1), 27–51.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2010) Cognitive, social, and psychological dimensions corrective feedback. In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning (pp. 151–165). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H.
(2008) The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36(3), 353–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, D.
(1999) The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 1–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Treatment of error in second language student writing: University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
(2003) Response to student writing: Implications for second language students: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ferris, D. R.
(2006) Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short–and long–term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 81–104). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, D., Brown, J., Liu, H. S., & Stine, M. E. A.
(2011) Responding to L2 students in college writing classes: Teacher perspectives. Tesol Quarterly, 45(2), 207–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grami, M.
(2005) The effect of teachers’ written feedback on ESL students’ perception: A study in a Saudi ESL university–level context. Annual Review of Education, Communication and Language Sciences, 2.Google Scholar
Halimi, S. S.
(2008) Indonesian teachers’ and students’ preferences for error correction. Wacana, 10(1), 50–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamouda, A.
(2011) A study of students and teachers’ preferences and attitudes towards correction of classroom written errors in Saudi EFL context. English Language Teaching, 4(3), p128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamp-Lyons, L.
(2007) The impact of testing practices on teaching.International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 487–504): Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K.
(2003) Second language writing. Ernst Klett Sprachen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F.
(2006) Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, I.
(2004) Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 285–312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 69–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Ten mismatches between teachers’ beliefs and written feedback practices. ELT Journal, 63(1), 12–22.Google Scholar
Leki, I.
(1991) The Preferences of ESL Students for Error Correction in College‐Level Writing Classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24(3), 203–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) “You cannot ignore”: Graduate L2 students’ experience of and response to written feedback practices within their disciplines. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in ESL writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 266–285). Campbridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2007) Undergraduates in a second language: Challenges and complexities of academic literacy development. New York: Lawarence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Merriam, S. B.
(2002) Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Montgomery, J. L., & Baker, W.
(2007) Teacher-written feedback: Student perceptions, teacher self-assessment, and actual teacher performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(2), 82–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polio, C.
(2003) Research on second language writing: An overview of what we investigate and how. Exploring the dynamics of second language writing, 35–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sheen, Y.
(2007) The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. Tesol Quarterly, 41(2), 255–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 201–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sheen, Y., Wright, D., & Moldawa, A.
(2009) Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System, 37(4), 556–569. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N., & Tapper, J.
(2000) The focus of teacher and student concerns in discipline–specific writing by university students. Higher Education Research and Development, 19(3), 337–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N. & Wigglesworth, G.
(2010a) Students’ engagement with feedback on writing: the role of learner agency/beliefs. In Batstone R (ed), Sociocognitive Perspectives on Language Use and Language Learning (pp. 166–185). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2010b) Learners’ processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing. Case studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 303–334. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, J.
(1996) The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language learning, 46(2), 327–369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Beuningen, C., de Jong, N., & Kuiken, F.
(2012) Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning, 62(1), 1–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 21 other publications

Ahmed, Abdelhamid M.
2020.  In Feedback in L2 English Writing in the Arab World,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Alshuraidah, Ali & Neomy Storch
2019. Investigating a collaborative approach to peer feedback. ELT Journal 73:2  pp. 166 ff. Crossref logo
Athimni, Moez, Safa Yaakoubi & Hanin Bouzaiene
2020.  In The Assessment of L2 Written English across the MENA Region,  pp. 325 ff. Crossref logo
Ben Hedia, Najoua
2020.  In The Assessment of L2 Written English across the MENA Region,  pp. 143 ff. Crossref logo
Cheng, Xiaolong & Lawrence Jun Zhang
2021. Teacher Written Feedback on English as a Foreign Language Learners’ Writing: Examining Native and Nonnative English-Speaking Teachers’ Practices in Feedback Provision. Frontiers in Psychology 12 Crossref logo
Cheng, Xiaolong, Lawrence Jun Zhang & Qiaozhen Yan
2021. Exploring teacher written feedback in EFL writing classrooms: Beliefs and practices in interaction. Language Teaching Research  pp. 136216882110576 ff. Crossref logo
Dang, Trang Thi Doan
2018.  In Transformation and Empowerment through Education,  pp. 36 ff. Crossref logo
Ghosn-Chelala, Maria & Wessam Al-Chibani
2018. Screencasting: supportive feedback for EFL remedial writing students. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology 35:3  pp. 146 ff. Crossref logo
Halim, Tanzina, Rizwana Wahid & Shanjida Halim
2021. EFL students' attitudes toward corrective feedback: a study conducted at undergraduate level. Saudi Journal of Language Studies 1:1  pp. 40 ff. Crossref logo
John Burrell, 이제영 & Jee Eun Lee
2016. Korean University Student Preferences for Written Corrective Feedback on English Writing. Journal of the Korea English Education Society 15:3  pp. 35 ff. Crossref logo
2018. Mesleğe Yeni Başlamış Ve Meslekte Deneyimli İngilizce Öğretmenlerinin Geri Bildirim Hakkındaki Düşünceleri Ve Uygulamalarının İncelenmesi. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi  pp. 355 ff. Crossref logo
Liu, Kailin & Neomy Storch
2021. Second language learners’ engagement with written feedback. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics Crossref logo
Mulati, Dyah Fitri, Joko Nurkamto & Nur Arifah Drajati
2020. THE TEACHERS’ BELIEFS IN TEACHER WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON THE STUDENTS' WRITING. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics & Literature) 5:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Pearson, William S.
2020. Predictors of citations in written feedback on ESL writing research. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management 14:1  pp. 55 ff. Crossref logo
Pearson, William S.
2020. Research article titles in written feedback on English as a second language writing. Scientometrics 123:2  pp. 997 ff. Crossref logo
Saeli, Hooman & An Cheng
2021. Discrepancies in Teachers’ Perceptions and Reported Practices: The Case of Written Feedback in an EFL Context. European Journal of Applied Linguistics 9:2  pp. 307 ff. Crossref logo
Soleimani, Neda, Mohammad Rahimi & Michelle Mingyue Gu
2021. (Mis) Alignment of Iranian EFL Teacher’s Written Corrective Feedback beliefs and practices from an Activity Theory Perspective. Cogent Education 8:1 Crossref logo
Storch, Neomy
2018. Written corrective feedback from sociocultural theoretical perspectives: A research agenda. Language Teaching 51:2  pp. 262 ff. Crossref logo
Storch, Neomy & Ali Alshuraidah
2020.  In Languaging in Language Learning and Teaching [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 55],  pp. 112 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Lawrence Jun & Xiaolong Cheng
2021. Examining the effects of comprehensive written corrective feedback on L2 EAP students’ linguistic performance: A mixed-methods study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 54  pp. 101043 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Tiefu, Xuemei Chen, Jiehui Hu & Pattarapon Ketwan
2021. EFL Students' Preferences for Written Corrective Feedback: Do Error Types, Language Proficiency, and Foreign Language Enjoyment Matter?. Frontiers in Psychology 12 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.