Cover not available
Article published In:
Postgraduate Writing in a Globalised World
Edited by Emmaline Lear and Elke Stracke
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 39:2] 2016
► pp. 139–157

Becoming an applied linguist

A study of authorial voice in international PhD students’ confirmation reports

| University of Melbourne

The need to establish an authorial identity in academic discourse has been considered to be critical for all doctoral students by academic writing teachers and researchers for some time. For students for whom English is an additional language (EAL) in particular, the challenges are not only how to communicate this identity effectively in English, but also how to develop from a writer who simply ventriloquizes the voices of scholarly others to an author who writes with authority and discipline-specific rhetorical knowledge. In the current project, we explored how three EAL students constructed authorial voices through the use of personal and impersonal forms of self-representation and evaluative stance in the Introduction sections of their written PhD Confirmation Reports. Our findings indicate that students combined a complex range of linguistic and rhetorical resources, such as integral and non-integral attribution of sources and attitudinal markers of stance, in their quest to project credible authorial identities as Applied Linguists. We also discovered the effect of these resources on readers to be cumulative. We recommend further research, including interviews with students, supervisors and examiners from across the disciplines, to explore and extend the scope of the present study.

Keywords: Authorial identity, students for whom English is an additional language, evaluative stance, doctoral writing, voice
Published online: 7 February 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.39.2.03tho
References
Bloomberg, L. D., & Volpe, M
(2012) Completing your qualitative dissertation: A road map from beginning to end (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, California & London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P
(1991) Language and symbolic power (G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bruce, I
(2014) Expressing criticality in the literature review in research article introductions in applied linguistics and psychology. English for Specific Purposes, 361, 85–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cadman, C
(1997) Thesis writing for international students: A question of identity? English for Specific Purposes, 16(1), 3–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, S
(2015) ‘Blessed in my own way’: Pedagogical affordances for dialogical voice construction in multilingual student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 271, 122–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charles, M
(2007) Argument or evidence? Disciplinary variation in the use of the Noun that pattern in stance construction. English for Specific Purposes, 261, 203–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S
(Eds.) (2011) Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J., & Wang, S. H
(2015) Identity in academic discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 351, 81–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hood, S
(2006) The persuasive power of prosodies: Radiating values in academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 51, 37–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K
(2005) Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 71, 173–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Metadiscourse: Mapping interactions in academic writing. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 91, 125–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ivanič, R., & Camps, D
(2001) ‘I am how I sound’: Voice as self-representation in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 101, 3–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamler, B., & Thompson, P
(2006) Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R
(2000) Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 142–175). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D
(2003) Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Matsuda, K. P
(2015) Identity in written discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 351, 140–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsuda, P., & Tardy, C
(2007) Voice in academic writing: The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review. English for Specific Purposes, 261, 235–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merriam, S. B
(1998) Qualitative research and case study application in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Mewburn, I., Tokareva, E., Cuthbert, D., Sinclair, J., & Barnacle, R
(2014) ‘These are issues that should not be raised in black and white’: The culture of progress reporting and the doctorate. Higher Education Research and Development, 33(3), 510–522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morton, J., Storch, N., & Thompson, C
(2014) Feedback on writing in the supervision of postgraduate students: Insights from Vygotsky and Bakhtin. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 8(1), 24–36.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A
(1994) The politics of pronouns. ELT Journal, 48(2), 173–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prior, P
(2001) Voices in text, mind, and society. Sociohistoric accounts of discourse acquisition and use. Journal of Second Language Writing, 101, 55–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramanathan, V., & Atkinson, D
(1999) Individualism, academic writing, and ESL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 45–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seloni, L
(2014) “I’m an artist and scholar who is trying to find the middle point”: A textographic analysis of a Columbian art historian’s thesis writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 251, 79–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverman, D
(Ed.) (2011) Qualitative research: Issues of theory, method, and practice (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Swales, J
(1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2004) Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C
(2011) Plagiarism, intertextuality and the politics of knowledge, identity and textual ownership in undergraduate ESL/EFL students’ academic writing. In Le Ha Phan & B. Baurain (Eds.), Voices, identities, negotiations, and conflicts: Writing academic English across cultures (pp. 157–177). Bingley, United Kingdom: Emerald.Google Scholar
Thompson, P
(2012) Achieving a voice of authority in PhD theses. In K. Hyland & C. S. Guinda (Eds.), Stance and voice in written academic genres (pp. 117–133). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Castelló, Montserrat, Lynn McAlpine, Anna Sala-Bubaré, Kelsey Inouye & Isabelle Skakni
2021. What perspectives underlie ‘researcher identity’? A review of two decades of empirical studies. Higher Education 81:3 ► pp. 567 ff. DOI logo
Morton, Janne & Neomy Storch
2021. Authorial Voice in Doctoral Writing: Published Advice. In Academic Literacy Development, ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Pearson, William S. & Esmaeel Abdollahzadeh
2023. Metadiscourse in academic writing: A systematic review. Lingua 293 ► pp. 103561 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.