Challenges faced by second language doctoral student writers in Hong Kong and their writing strategies
Writing at the doctoral level presents many challenges for second language writers. This paper reports on a longitudinal study investigating English as a second language (ESL) doctoral students’ writing problems and the strategies they developed to meet these challenges. Eight students were interviewed four times over a two-year period during their doctoral program and a questionnaire was sent to over 150 postgraduate students to investigate their major writing challenges and their self-initiated strategies. The findings suggested that students’ writing challenges were in two main areas: difficulties with expressing complex ideas in a second language; and difficulties with developing confidence and a convincing academic voice. This paper focuses on the strategies students developed to deal with their writing challenges and uses one case to show how these evolved over a two-year period. Strategies used consistently and successfully included using expert writing such as academic articles as writing ‘models’ and the use of peer support networks that provided advice and feedback on the students’ writing and also offered opportunities for academic collaboration. The study adds to our growing knowledge of the resources and support available to doctoral writers, highlighting the use of social and academic networking and the role played by textual resources such as articles and theses as textual mentors.
References (42)
Abasi, A. R., & Graves, B. (2008). Academic literacy and plagiarism: Conversations with international graduate students and disciplinary professors. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 71, 221–233.
Ackerman, J. (1995). Postscript: the assimilation and tactics of Nate. In C. Berkenkotter & T. Huckin (Eds.), Genre knowledge in disciplinary communities: Cognition/culture/power (pp. 145–150). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Adamek, M. E. (2015). Building scholarly writers: Student perspectives on peer peview in a doctoral writing seminar. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 35(1-2), 213–225.
Aitchison, C. (2009). Writing groups for doctoral education. Studies in Higher Education, 34(8), 905–916.
Bartholomae, D. (1986). Inventing the university. Journal of Basic Writing, 51, 4–23.
Bitchener, J., & Basturkmen, H. (2006). Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(1), 4–18.
Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). Critical academic writing and multilingual students. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Carter, S., & Laurs, D. (2014). Developing generic support for doctoral students: Practice and pedagogy. Hoboken: Taylor & Francis.
Casanave, C. (2002) Writing games: Multicultural case studies of academic literacy practices in higher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Casanave, C. (2008) Learning participatory practices in graduate school: Some perspective-taking by a mainstream educator. In C. Casanave & X. Li (Eds.), Learning the practices of graduate school: Insiders’ reflections on academic enculturation (pp. 14–31). Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Casanave, C. P., & Li, X. (Eds.). (2008). Learning the literacy practices of graduate school: Insiders’ reflections on academic enculturation. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
Casanave, C., & Vandrick, S. (2003) (Eds.). Writing for scholarly publication: Behind the scenes in language education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cotterall, S. (2013a). The rich get richer: International doctoral candidates and scholarly identity. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(4), 360–370.
Cotterall, S. (2013b). More than just a brain: Emotions and the doctoral experience. Higher Education Research & Development 32(2): 174–87.
Gruzd, A., Staves, K., & Wilk, A. (2012). Connected scholars: Examining the role of social media in research practices of faculty using the UTAUT model. Computers in Human Behavior, 281, pp. 2340–2350.
Guerin, C., Carter, S., & Aitchison, C. (2015). Blogging as community of practice: Lessons for academic development? International Journal for Academic Development, 20(3), 1–12.
Hirvela, A., & Belcher, D. (2001). Coming back to voice: The multiple voices and identities of mature multilingual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(1-2), 83–106. .
Hu, J. (2010). Faculty perceptions of Chinese graduate students’ communication challenges in the science and engineering disciplines. Canadian and International Education, 39(3), 59–80.
Hyland, K. (2002). Options of identity in academic writing. ELT Journal, 5(4), 351–358.
Kozar, O., & Lum, J. (2015). Online doctoral writing groups: Do facilitators or communication modes make a difference? Quality in Higher Education, 21(1), 38–51.
Kriner, B., Coffman, K., Adkisson, A., & Putman, P. (2015). From students to scholars: The transformative power of communities of practice. Adult Learning, 26(2), 73–80.
Kuwahara, N. (2008). It’s not in the orientation manual: How a first-year doctoral student learnt to survive in graduate school. In C. P. Casanave & X. Li (Eds.), Learning the literacy practices of graduate school: Insiders’ reflections on academic enculturation (pp. 186–200). Ann Arbor, Michigan: Michigan University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lei, X. (2008). Exploring a sociocultural approach to writing strategy research: Mediated actions in writing activities. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(4), 217–236.
Leki, I. (1995). Coping strategies of ESL students in writing tasks across the curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 235–260. .
Lillis, T., & Curry, M. (2010) Academic writing in a global context – the politics and practices of publishing in English. London: Routledge.
Maher, A., Feldon, D., Timmerman, B., & Chao, J. (2014). Faculty perceptions of common challenges encountered by novice doctoral writers. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(4), 699–711. .
Maringe, F., & Jenkins, J. (2015). Stigma, tensions, and apprehension. International Journal of Educational Management, 291(5), 609–626.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (2011). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Morita, N. (2004), Negotiating Participation and Identity in Second Language Academic Communities. TESOL Quarterly, 381, 573–603. .
Odena, O., & Burgess, H. (2015). How doctoral students and graduates describe facilitating experiences and strategies for their thesis writing learning process: A qualitative approach. Studies in Higher Education, 1–19.
Oxford, R. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Pecorari, D., & Shaw, P. (2012). Types of student intertextuality and faculty attitudes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(2), 149–164.
Petrić, B. (2007). “This English writing thing”. Students’ perceptions of their writing experiences at an English-medium university. Porta Linguarum, 71, 45–55.
Petrić, B. (2012). Legitimate textual borrowing: Direct quotation in L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 211,102–117.
Qian, J., & Krugly-Smolska, E. (2008). Chinese graduate students’ experiences with writing a literature review. TESL Canada Journal, 26(1), 68–86.
Siemens, G., & Matheos, K. (2010). Systemic changes in higher education. ineducation,16(1), 3–18.
Steel, K., Cohen, J., Hurley, M., & Joy, E. (2012). Why we blog: An essay in four movements. Literature Compass, 9(12), 1016–1032.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, M. (2011). Chinese postgraduate students learning to write in English: Toward an understanding of L2 academic writing. In P. L. Ha & B. Baurain (Eds.), Voices, identities, negotiations, and conflicts: Writing academic English across cultures (pp. 41–58). London: Emerald Group Pub.
Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Wang, Chunyan, Xiaoqiong You & Jiawei Lu
2023.
Reading ability and challenges in a project-based academic report writing course: A test of the threshold hypothesis.
Language Teaching Research
Lin, Linda H.F. & Bruce Morrison
2021.
Challenges in academic writing: Perspectives of Engineering faculty and L2 postgraduate research students.
English for Specific Purposes 63
► pp. 59 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.