Cover not available
Article published In:
Postgraduate Writing in a Globalised World
Edited by Emmaline Lear and Elke Stracke
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 39:2] 2016
► pp. 158–180

Challenges faced by second language doctoral student writers in Hong Kong and their writing strategies

| University of Hong Kong

Writing at the doctoral level presents many challenges for second language writers. This paper reports on a longitudinal study investigating English as a second language (ESL) doctoral students’ writing problems and the strategies they developed to meet these challenges. Eight students were interviewed four times over a two-year period during their doctoral program and a questionnaire was sent to over 150 postgraduate students to investigate their major writing challenges and their self-initiated strategies. The findings suggested that students’ writing challenges were in two main areas: difficulties with expressing complex ideas in a second language; and difficulties with developing confidence and a convincing academic voice. This paper focuses on the strategies students developed to deal with their writing challenges and uses one case to show how these evolved over a two-year period. Strategies used consistently and successfully included using expert writing such as academic articles as writing ‘models’ and the use of peer support networks that provided advice and feedback on the students’ writing and also offered opportunities for academic collaboration. The study adds to our growing knowledge of the resources and support available to doctoral writers, highlighting the use of social and academic networking and the role played by textual resources such as articles and theses as textual mentors.

Keywords: Doctoral writing, writing problems, postgraduate ESL writers, textual appropriation, writing strategies
Published online: 7 February 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.39.2.04hyl
References
Abasi, A. R., & Graves, B
(2008) Academic literacy and plagiarism: Conversations with international graduate students and disciplinary professors. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 71, 221–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, J
(1995) Postscript: the assimilation and tactics of Nate. In C. Berkenkotter & T. Huckin (Eds.), Genre knowledge in disciplinary communities: Cognition/culture/power (pp. 145–150). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Adamek, M. E
(2015) Building scholarly writers: Student perspectives on peer peview in a doctoral writing seminar. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 35(1-2), 213–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aitchison, C
(2009) Writing groups for doctoral education. Studies in Higher Education, 34(8), 905–916. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartholomae, D
(1986) Inventing the university. Journal of Basic Writing, 51, 4–23.Google Scholar
Bitchener, J., & Basturkmen, H
(2006) Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(1), 4–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, A. S
(2002) Critical academic writing and multilingual students. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, S., & Laurs, D
(2014) Developing generic support for doctoral students: Practice and pedagogy. Hoboken: Taylor & Francis. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casanave, C
(2002) Writing games: Multicultural case studies of academic literacy practices in higher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2008) Learning participatory practices in graduate school: Some perspective-taking by a mainstream educator. In C. Casanave & X. Li (Eds.), Learning the practices of graduate school: Insiders’ reflections on academic enculturation (pp. 14–31). Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casanave, C. P., & Li, X
(Eds.) (2008) Learning the literacy practices of graduate school: Insiders’ reflections on academic enculturation. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casanave, C., & Vandrick, S
(2003) (Eds.). Writing for scholarly publication: Behind the scenes in language education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cotterall, S
(2013a) The rich get richer: International doctoral candidates and scholarly identity. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(4), 360–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013b) More than just a brain: Emotions and the doctoral experience. Higher Education Research & Development 32(2): 174–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gruzd, A., Staves, K., & Wilk, A
(2012) Connected scholars: Examining the role of social media in research practices of faculty using the UTAUT model. Computers in Human Behavior, 281, pp. 2340–2350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guerin, C., Carter, S., & Aitchison, C
(2015) Blogging as community of practice: Lessons for academic development? International Journal for Academic Development, 20(3), 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirvela, A., & Belcher, D
(2001) Coming back to voice: The multiple voices and identities of mature multilingual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(1-2), 83–106. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Hu, J
(2010) Faculty perceptions of Chinese graduate students’ communication challenges in the science and engineering disciplines. Canadian and International Education, 39(3), 59–80.Google Scholar
Hyland, K
(2002) Options of identity in academic writing. ELT Journal, 5(4), 351–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kozar, O., & Lum, J
(2015) Online doctoral writing groups: Do facilitators or communication modes make a difference? Quality in Higher Education, 21(1), 38–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kriner, B., Coffman, K., Adkisson, A., & Putman, P
(2015) From students to scholars: The transformative power of communities of practice. Adult Learning, 26(2), 73–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuwahara, N
(2008) It’s not in the orientation manual: How a first-year doctoral student learnt to survive in graduate school. In C. P. Casanave & X. Li (Eds.), Learning the literacy practices of graduate school: Insiders’ reflections on academic enculturation (pp. 186–200). Ann Arbor, Michigan: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E
(1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lei, X
(2008) Exploring a sociocultural approach to writing strategy research: Mediated actions in writing activities. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(4), 217–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leki, I
(1995) Coping strategies of ESL students in writing tasks across the curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 235–260. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Lillis, T., & Curry, M
(2010) Academic writing in a global context – the politics and practices of publishing in English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Maher, A., Feldon, D., Timmerman, B., & Chao, J
(2014) Faculty perceptions of common challenges encountered by novice doctoral writers. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(4), 699–711. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Maringe, F., & Jenkins, J
(2015) Stigma, tensions, and apprehension. International Journal of Educational Management, 291(5), 609–626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G
(2011) Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Morita, N
(2004), Negotiating Participation and Identity in Second Language Academic Communities. TESOL Quarterly, 381, 573–603. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Odena, O., & Burgess, H
(2015) How doctoral students and graduates describe facilitating experiences and strategies for their thesis writing learning process: A qualitative approach. Studies in Higher Education, 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oxford, R
(2011) Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Pecorari, D., & Shaw, P
(2012) Types of student intertextuality and faculty attitudes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(2), 149–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petrić, B
(2007) “This English writing thing”. Students’ perceptions of their writing experiences at an English-medium university. Porta Linguarum, 71, 45–55.Google Scholar
(2012) Legitimate textual borrowing: Direct quotation in L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 211,102–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Qian, J., & Krugly-Smolska, E
(2008) Chinese graduate students’ experiences with writing a literature review. TESL Canada Journal, 26(1), 68–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siemens, G., & Matheos, K
(2010) Systemic changes in higher education. ineducation,16(1), 3–18.Google Scholar
Steel, K., Cohen, J., Hurley, M., & Joy, E
(2012) Why we blog: An essay in four movements. Literature Compass, 9(12), 1016–1032. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L
(1978) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, M
(2011) Chinese postgraduate students learning to write in English: Toward an understanding of L2 academic writing. In P. L. Ha & B. Baurain (Eds.), Voices, identities, negotiations, and conflicts: Writing academic English across cultures (pp. 41–58). London: Emerald Group Pub.Google Scholar
Yin, R
(2009) Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Lin, Linda H.F. & Bruce Morrison
2021. Challenges in academic writing: Perspectives of Engineering faculty and L2 postgraduate research students. English for Specific Purposes 63 ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Chunyan, Xiaoqiong You & Jiawei Lu
2023. Reading ability and challenges in a project-based academic report writing course: A test of the threshold hypothesis. Language Teaching Research DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.