Cover not available
Article published In:
Flourishing in Italian: Positive Psychology approaches to the teaching and learning of Italian in Australia
Edited by Antonia Rubino, Antonella Strambi and Vincenza Tudini
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 40:2] 2017
► pp. 194–211

“Siamo vicini, no?”

Negotiating commonality for rapport building in Italian L1-L2 online text chat

| University of South Australia
| Flinders University
Focusing specifically on the negotiation of commonality, this study explores rapport building (Spencer-Oatey, 2000) in online intercultural text chat, where Australian students of Italian interact with L1 Italian speakers. Although the initial purpose of the examined chat exchanges is to facilitate L2 acquisition, analysis of transcripts indicates that participants also seek to establish affiliation and friendship, through discussion of shared experiences, preferred leisure activities, and personal likings. Such orientation to like-mindedness and commonality can be an implicit concern in their interactions, as well as an explicit mentionable in their talk. Participants also successfully engage in complex face-saving and rapport maintenance strategies where there is potential for disagreement. Overall, the data suggest that identified rapport-building language and behaviors promote the establishment of positive relationships, as a key component of online intercultural text chat. Thus, from a pedagogical viewpoint, these interactions appear beneficial both for L2 learning and student wellbeing. The study concludes with suggestions for the integration of similar tasks into language programs.
Keywords: online text chat, online relationship building, wellbeing, Italian, conversation analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction and study background
  • 2.Research method and data
  • 3.Results
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 1 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.40.2.07tud
References (34)
References
Ädel, A. (2011). Rapport building in student group work. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(12), 2932–2947. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(2), 99–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, C., Drew, P., & Pinch, T. (2003). Managing prospect affiliation and rapport in real-life sales encounters. Discourse Studies, 5(1), 5–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, S. (2004). Social relationships and health. American Psychologist, 59(8), 676. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13(1), 81–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dooly, M., & Tudini, V. (2016). ‘Now we are teachers’: The role of small talk in student language teachers’ telecollaborative task development. Journal of Pragmatics, 1021, 38–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Murphey, T. (2003). Group dynamics in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dreyer, C., & Oxford, R. L. (1996). Learning strategies and other predictors of ESL proficiency among Afrikaans speakers in South Africa. In R. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 61–74). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Forbes, S. H. (2003). Holistic education: An analysis of its ideas and nature. Brandon, VT: Foundation for Educational Renewal.Google Scholar
Garcia, A. C., & Jacobs, J. B. (1999). The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(4), 337–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. M. (2013). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gil, D. (2008). Toward a ‘radical’paradigm of restorative justice. In D. Sullivan & L. Tifft (Eds.), Handbook of restorative justice (pp. 499–511). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Herring, S. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4), 1–13.Google Scholar
Hudak, P. L., & Maynard, D. W. (2011). An interactional approach to conceptualising small talk in medical interactions. Sociology of Health and Illness, 33(4), 634–653. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddicoat, A. J., & Tudini, V. (2013). Expert-novice orientations: Native speaker power and the didactic voice in online intercultural interaction. In F. Sharifian & M. Jamarani (Eds.), Intercultural communication in the new era (pp.181–197). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z., Clément, R., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markee, N. P. P. (2000). Conversation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maynard, D. W., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1984). Topical talk, ritual and the social organization of relationship. Social Psychology Quarterly, 471, 301–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmieri, C. (2017). Belonging, idealized self and wellbeing: Key motivators among adult learners of Italian in Sydney. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 40(2), 178–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 81, 289–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seligman, M. E. P. (2012). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Atria Books. (Original work published 2011).Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000). Rapport management: A framework for analysis. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally speaking. Managing rapport through talk across cultures (pp. 11–46). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2005). (Im)politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 95–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H., & Stadler, S. (2009). The global people competency framework. Competencies for effective intercultural interaction (Vol. 31). Centre for Applied Linguistics, University of Warwick. Retrieved from [URL]
Svennevig, J. (2000). Getting acquainted in conversation: A study of initial interactions. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Statista. (2017). Most famous social network sites worldwide as of January 2017, ranked by number of active users (in millions). Retrieved from [URL]
Strambi, A., Luzeckyj, A., & Rubino, A. (2017). Flourishing in a second language (FL2): Integrating Positive Psychology, Transition Pedagogy and CLIL principles. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 40(2), 123–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning and Technology, 7(2), 38–67.Google Scholar
Tudini, V. (2010). Online Second Language Acquisition: A conversation analysis of online chat. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Ware, P. D., & Kramsch, C. (2005). Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. Modern Language Journal, 891, 190–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Žegarac, V., Spencer-Oatey, H., & Ushioda, E. (2014). Conceptualizing mindfulness – mindlessness in intercultural interaction. International Journal of Language and Culture, 1(1), 75–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zemel, A., & Çakir, M. P. (2009). Reading’s work in VMT. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying virtual math teams (pp. 261–276). New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Dooly, Melinda & Vincenza Tudini
2022. ‘I Remember When I Was in Spain’: Student-Teacher Storytelling in Online Collaborative Task Accomplishment. In Storytelling Practices in Home and Educational Contexts, ► pp. 283 ff. DOI logo
Mrowa-Hopkin, Colette
2022. An Analysis of Skype Exchanges for Promoting Intercultural Learning and Understanding Among University Language Students. Journal of Intercultural Communication 22:1 ► pp. 92 ff. DOI logo
Strambi, Antonella & Vincenza Tudini
2020. “I'll say something about myself”: Questions and self-disclosures in Italian L1-L2 online initial interactions. Journal of Pragmatics 170 ► pp. 82 ff. DOI logo
Bouvet, Eric, Daniela Cosmini, Maria Palaktsoglou & Lynn Vanzo
2017. ‘Doing good’ in Italian through student community engagement. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 40:2 ► pp. 159 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.