Article published in:
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 8:1 (1985) ► pp. 130
References
Anderson, J.
(1969) A note on ‘rank’ and ‘delicacy’. Journal of Linguistics 51, 129–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bazell, C.E., Catford, J.C. and Halliday, M.A.K.
(1966) In Memory of J.R. Firth. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B.
(1971) Class, Codes and Control 1: Theoretical Studies towards a Sociology of Language. Primary Socialization, Language and Education (ed. B. Berstein) Vol. IV1. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) (1973) Class, Codes and Control 2: Applied Studies towards a Sociology of Language. Primary Socialization, Language and Education (ed. B. Berstein) Vol. IV1. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Burton, D.
(1982) Through glass darkly: through dark glasses. In Carter 1982a, 195–214.Google Scholar
Butler, C.S.
(1985) Systemic Linguistics: Theory and Applications London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Carter, R.
(ed.) (1982a) Language and Literature: An Introductory Reader In Stylistics. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
(1982b) Style and interpretation in Hemingway’s ‘Cat in the Rain’. In Carter 1982a, 65–80.Google Scholar
Davey, A.
(1978) Discourse Production: A Computer Model of Some Aspects of a Speaker. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Dore, J.
(1977) Review of Halliday 1975. Of Language in Society 61, 114–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, P.S., Pearch, J.J. and Thornton, G.M.
(1971) Language in Use. Schools Council Programme in Linguistics and English Teaching. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Ellis, J.
(1966) On contextual meaning. In Bazell et al. 1966, 79–95.Google Scholar
Fawcett, R.P.
(1974) Some proposals for systemic syntax. Part 1. MALS Journal 11, 1–15.Google Scholar
(1975) Some proposals for systemic syntax. Part 2. MALS Journal (2)11, 43–68.Google Scholar
(1976) Some proposals for systemic syntax. Part 3. MALS Journal (2)21, 35–68.Google Scholar
(1980) Cognitive Linguistics and Social Interaction: Towards and Integrated Model of a Systemic Functional Grammar and the other Components of a Communicating Mind. Heidelberg: Julius Groos verlag and Exeter: university of Exeter.Google Scholar
Firth, J.R.
(1957) Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gregory, M.
(1967) Aspects of varieties differentation. Journal of Linguistics 31, 177–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1974) A theory for stylistics – exemplified: Donne’s “Holy Sonnet XIV”. Language and Style VII1, 108–18.Google Scholar
(1978) Marvell’s ‘To his coy mistress’: the poem as a linguistic and social event. Poetics 71, 351–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K.
(1961) Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 171, 241–92. Reprinted in part in Kress 1976, 52–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1964) Descriptive linguistics in literary studies. In Duthie, A. (ed.) English Studies Today: Third Series. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 25–39. Reprinted in Mcintosh and Halliday 1966, 56–69. Also reprinted in Freeman, D.C. (ed.) Linguistics and Literary Style. New York: Hold Rinehart and Winston 1970, 57–72.Google Scholar
(1966a) Lexis as a linguistic level. In Bazell et al. 1966, 148–62.Google Scholar
(1966b) Some notes on “deep” grammar. Journal of Linguistics 21, 57–67. Reprinted in part in Kress 1976, 88–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1966c) The concept of rank: a reply. Journal of Linguistics 21, 110–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1966d) General linguistics and its application to language teaching. In McIntosh and Halliday 1966, 1–41.Google Scholar
(1968) Notes on transitivity and theme in English, Part 3. Journal of Linguistics 41, 179–215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1969) Options and functions in the English clause. Brno Studies in English 81, 81–88. Reprinted in Householder, F.W. (ed.) Syntactic Theory 1: Structuralist. Harmondsworth: Penguin 1972, 248–57. Also reprinted in Halliday and Martin 1981, 138–45.Google Scholar
(1970) Language structure and language function. In Lyons, J. (ed.) New Horizons in Linguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 140–65.Google Scholar
(1971) Linguistic function and literary style: an inquiry into the language of William Golding’s The Inheritors. In Chatman, S. Literary Style: A Symposium. New York: Oxford University Press, 362–400. Reprinted in Halliday 1973, 103–43.Google Scholar
(1973) Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
(1975) Learning How to Mean: Explorations in the Development of Language. London: Edward Arnold. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1978) Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. and Martin, J.R.
(eds.) (1981) Readings in Systemic Linguistics. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K., Mcintosh, A. and Strevens, P.
(1964) The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hawkins, P.R.
(1969) Social class, the nominal group and reference. Language and Speech 121, 125–35. Reprinted in Bernstein 1973, 81–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1977) Social Class, the Nominal Group and Verbal Strategies. Primary Socialization, Language and Education (ed. B. Bernstein) Vol. III1. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hudson, R.A.
(1971) English Complex Sentences: An Introduction to Systemic Grammar. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
(1974) Systemic generative grammar. Linguistics 1391, 5–42.Google Scholar
(1976) Arguments for a Non-Transformational Grammar, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1978) Daughter-dependency grammar and systemic grammar. UEA Papers in Linguistics 61, 1–14.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C.
(1976) Systemic grammar and its use in literary analysis. MALS Journal, New Series 11, 17–38. Reprinted in Carter 1982a, 83–99.Google Scholar
Kress, G.
(ed.) (1976) Halliday: System and Function in Language. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Langendoen, D.T.
(1968) The London School of Linguistics: A Study of the Longuistic Theories of B. Malinowski and J.R. Firth. Research Monograph No. 46. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1971) Review of Palmer 1968. Language 471, 180–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J.
(1966) Firth’s theory of meaning. In Bazell et al. 1966, 288–302.Google Scholar
Mackay, D., Thompson, B. and Schaub, P.
(1970) Breakthrough to Literacy: Teacher’s Manual. The Theory and Practice of Teaching Initial Reading and Writing. London: Longman for the Schools Council.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B.
(1923) The problem of meaning in primitive languages. Supplement to Ogden, C.K. and Richards, I.A. The Meaning of Meaning. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
(1935) Coral Gardens and Their Magic, Vol. 21. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Mann, W.C.
(1982) An Introduction to the Nigel Text Generation Grammar Computer Program. sc/Information Sciences Institute, Technical Report.Google Scholar
(1983) Systemic encounters with computation. Network 51, 27–33.Google Scholar
Mann, W.C. and Matthiessen, C.M.I.M.
(1983) Nigel: A Systemic Grammar for Text Generation. USC/Information Sciences Institute. Technical Report RR-83–105. To appear in Greaves and Benson (forthcoming) Systemic Perspectives on Discourse: Selected Theoretical Papers from the 9th International Systemic Workshop. Northwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Matthews, P.H.
(1966) The concept of rank in Neo-Firthian linguistics. Journal of Linguistics 21, 101–09. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mcintosh, A. and Halliday, M.A.K.
(1966) Patterns of Language: Papers in General, Descriptive and Applied Linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Palmer, F.R.
(1968) Selected Papers of J.R. Firth, 1952–59. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Parret, H.
(1974) Discussing Language. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Short, M.H.
(1976) Why we sympathise with Lennie. MALS Journal, New Series 11, 1–9.Google Scholar
(1982) ‘Prelude I’ to a literary stylistics. In Carter 1982a, 55–62.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. McH.
(1966a) Beginning the study of lexis. In Bazell et al. 1966, 410–30.Google Scholar
(1966b) Taking a poem to pieces. In Fowler, R. (ed.) Essays on Language and Style. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 68–81.Google Scholar
(1968) A technique of stylistic description. Language and Style 11, 215–42.Google Scholar
(1972) A Course in Spoken English: Grammar. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1982) Lines about ‘Lines’. In Carter 1982a, 163–76.Google Scholar
Spencer, J. and Gregory, M.J.
(1964) An approach to the study of style. In Spencer, J. (ed.) Linguistics and Style. London: Oxford University Press, 57–105.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M.
(1976) Language, Schools and Classrooms. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
(1980) Language and Literacy: The Sociolinguistics of Reading and Writing. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Turner, G.J.
(1973) Social class and children’s language of control at age five and age seven. In Bernstein 1973, 135–201.Google Scholar
Turner, G.J. and Mohan, B.A.
(1970) A Linguistic Description and Computer Program for Children’s Speech. Primary Socialization, Language and Education (ed. B. Bernstein), Vol. II1. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Turner, G. and Pickvance, R.
(1971) Social class differences in the expression of uncertainty in five-year-old children. Language and Speech 141, 303–25. Reprinted in Bernstein 1973, 93–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Winograd, T.
(1972) Understanding Natural Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1983) Language as a Cognitive Process. Vol. 11: Syntax. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Butler, Christopher S.
1988. Pragmatics and systematic linguistics. Journal of Pragmatics 12:1  pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Butler, Christopher S.
1989. Systemic models: unity, diversity and change. <i>WORD</i> 40:1-2  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.