References
Breen, M.P., C. Candlin, and A. Waters
(1983) Communicative materials design: some basic principles. In Richards, D. (ed.) Concepts and functions in current syllabuses. RELC Occasional Papers, 301: 111–123. Singapore, RELC.Google Scholar
Brindley, C.
Corder, S.P.
(1967) The significance of learners’ errors. IRAL, V, 41: 161–170.Google Scholar
Krashen, S.D.
(1981) Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford, Pergamon.Google Scholar
Krashen, S.D., and T.D. Terrell
(1983) The natural approach. Oxford, Pergamon.Google Scholar
Littlewood, W.T.
(1984) Foreign and second language learning. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(1985a) Learnability and syllabus construction. In Hyltenstam, K. and M. Pienemann (eds.) Modelling and assessing second language acquisition. Clevedon: Avon, Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar
(1985b) Psycholinguistic principles of second language teaching. To appear in Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Prabhu, N.S.
(1984) Procedural syllabuses. In Read, J. (ed.) Trends in language syllabus design. Singapore, RELC.Google Scholar
Richards, D.R.
(1982) Review article: contrastive linguistics and the language teacher. In ARAL, VI, 21: 91–103.Google Scholar
(1983) Communicative efficiency in adult second language development. In Richards, D.R. (ed.) Australian Studies of Second Language Development. Special joint edition of ARAL Occasional Papers No. 6 and International Studies Bulletin (Utrecht), pp 84–101.Google Scholar
Schumann, J.
(1978) The acculturation model for second language acquisition. In Gingras, R.C. (ed.) Second language acquisition and foreign language teaching. Washington D.C., Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar