Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Gender in the Australian Context
Edited by Joanne Winter and Gillian Wigglesworth
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. Series S 10] 1993
► pp. 13–34

Language planning, language reform and the sexes in Australia

| Monash University

This paper deals with the phenomena of linguistic sexism and non-sexist language reform (feminist language planning) in the Australian context. It surveys Australian work on linguistic sexism and discusses various aspects of non-sexist language reform in Australia. Particular emphasis is placed on problematic issues relating to feminist language planning, i.e. the selection and evaluation of non-sexist alternatives and the implementation mechanisms for this type of reform. Linguistic change resulting from the reform initiatives and its spread throughout the community is also described briefly.

Published online: 1 January 1993
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aralss.10.02pau
References
Adamsky, C.
(1981) Changes in pronominal usage in a classroom situation. Psychology of Women Quarterly 51: 773–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
American Psychological Association
(1975) Guidelines for nonsexist language in APA journals. American Psychologist 321:487–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bate, B.
(1978) Nonsexist language use in transition. Journal of Communication 281: 139–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blaubergs, M. S.
(1980) An analysis of classic arguments against changing sexist language. In C. Kramarae (ed.) The voices and words of women and men. Oxford: Pergamon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D.
(1985) Feminism and linguistic theory. London: MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R.
(1984) The avoidance of androcentric generics. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 501: 5–20.Google Scholar
Daly, M.
(1978) Gyn/Ecology. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Edgar, P. and H. McPhee
(1974) Media she. Melbourne: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Ellerington, K.
(1989) Media and public reaction to the Commonwealth style manual. Class paper (unpublished), Department of Linguistics, Monash University.Google Scholar
Fasold, R.
(1984) The sociolinguistics of society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Frank, F.W.
(1985) Language planning and sexual equality: Guidelines for non-sexist usage. In M. Hellinger (ed.). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989) Language planning, language reform and language change: A review of guidelines for nonsexist usage. In F. W. Frank and P.A. Treichler (eds).Google Scholar
Frank, F.W. and F. Anshen
(1983) Languages and the sexes. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Frank, F.W. and P.A. Treichler
(1989) Language, gender and professional writing. New York: Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
Freebody, P. and C. Baker
(1987) The construction and operation of gender in children’s first school books. In A. Pauwels (ed.) Women and language in Australian and New Zealand society. Sydney: Australian Professional Publications.Google Scholar
Friedan, B.
(1963) The feminine mystique. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Harres, A.
this vol.) The representation of women in three medical texts. Australian Review in Applied Linguistics Series S. 101.
Healy, P. and P. Ryan
(1974) The female image – sexism in children’s books. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
Hellinger, M.
(1989) Kontrastive feministische Linguistik. München: Hueber Verlag.Google Scholar
(ed.) (1985) Sprachwandel und feministische Sprachpolitik: Internationale Perspektiven. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henley, N.
(1987) The new species that seeks a new language: On sexism in language and language change. In J. Penfield (ed.) Women and language in transition. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Henley, N. and D. Dragun
(1983) A survey of attitudes towards sex-biased language. Paper presented at meeting of the American Psychological Association, Anaheim, California, August 1983.
Jaehrling, S.
(1988) Attitudes to sexist and non-sexist language: A comparative study of German and Australian students. B.A. Hons, thesis (unpublished), Department of German, Monash University.Google Scholar
Jernudd, B.
(1973) Language planning as a type of language treatment. In J. Rubin and R. Shuy (eds.).Google Scholar
Lee, A.
1982 People and women people: Are women human? A study of sexist language in the media, (mimeo)Google Scholar
MacKay, D.G.
(1980) On the goals, principles and procedures for prescriptive grammar. Language in Society 91: 349–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martyna, W.
(1978) What does ‘he’ mean? Use of the generic masculine. Journal of Communication 281: 131–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGraw-Hill Book Company
(1983) Guidelines for bias-free publishing. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Miller, C. and K. Swift
(1981) The handbook of non-sexist writing for writers, editors and speakers. London: The Women’s Press.Google Scholar
Neustupny, Jirì
(1970) Basic types of treatment of language problems. Linguistic Communications 11: 77–98.Google Scholar
Pauwels, A.
(1987) Language in transition: A study of the title ‘Ms’ in contemporary Australian society. In A. Pauwels (ed.) Women and language in Australian and New Zealand society. Sydney: Australian Professional Publications.Google Scholar
(1989a) Some thoughts on gender, inequality and language reform. Vox 31, 78–84.Google Scholar
(1989b) Feminist language change in Australia: Changes in generic pronoun use. Paper given at the Annual Conference of the German Linguistics Society, Osnabrück, March 1989.
(1991) Sexism and language planning in English-speaking countries: Some issues and problems. Working Papers on Language, Gender and Sexism 1/2: 17–30.Google Scholar
in press) Gender and language reform. In Proceedings of the 1992 Style Council of Australia. Sydney: Macquarie University.
Rubin, J.
(1971) Evaluation and language planning. In J. Rubin and B. Jernudd (eds.).Google Scholar
(1973) Language planning: Discussion of some current issues. In J. Rubin and R. Shuy (eds).Google Scholar
Rubin, J. and B. Jernudd
(eds) (1971) Can languages be planned? Honolulu: University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Rubin, J. and R. Shuy
(eds) (1973) Language planning: Current issues and research. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Schräpel, B.
(1985) Nicht-sexistische Sprache und soziolinguistische Aspekte von Sprachwandel und Sprachplanung. In M. Hellinger (ed.). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scutt, J.
(1985) Sexism in legal language. Australian Law Journal 591: 163–173.Google Scholar
Sorrels, B.
(1983) The non sexist communicator: Solving the problems of gender and awkwardness in Modern English. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice.Google Scholar
Spender, D.
(1980) Man made language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Stanley, J.P.
(1978) Sexist grammar. College English 391: 800–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stirling, L.
(1987) Language and gender in Australian newspapers. In A. Pauwels (ed.).Google Scholar
Thomas, K.E.
(1980) The influence of feminism on language: A decade of letters to The Times. Quaderni di Filologia Germanica della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia dell’ Università di Bologna 11: 247–59.Google Scholar
Thorne, B. and N. Henley
(eds) (1975) Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Thorne, B., C. Kramarae and N. Henley
(eds) (1983) Language, gender and society. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Thwaite, A.
(1984) Sexism in three Mills and Boon romances. B.A. Hons. thesis (unpublished) Department of Linguistics: The University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Winfield, R.
(1984) Gender-neutral language. Law Society Journal 221: 721Google Scholar
Wood, J.
(1980) Toward non-sexist guidelines for the media. Canberra: Office of Women’s Affairs.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Bengoechea, Mercedes
2011. Non-sexist Spanish policies: an attempt bound to fail?. Current Issues in Language Planning 12:1 ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Pauwels, Anne
2003. Linguistic Sexism and Feminist Linguistic Activism. In The Handbook of Language and Gender, ► pp. 550 ff. DOI logo
Tenorio, Encarnación Hidalgo
2000. Gender, Sex and Stereotyping in the Collins COBUILD English Language Dictionary. Australian Journal of Linguistics 20:2 ► pp. 211 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.