Cover not available
Article published In:
Spoken Interaction Studies in Australia
Edited by Rod Gardner
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. Series S 11] 1994
► pp. 47–82

>Gossip

Two complementary perspectives on the analysis of casual conversation in English

| University of Technology, Sydney

This paper argues that the linguistic analysis of gossip reveals not only a great deal about the social role and function of gossip in our society and is therefore important to social theory, but that an analysis of the language of gossip can provide insights into the analysis of casual conversation in English. This paper provides a generic analysis of gossip. The analysis demonstrates that gossip is a culturally determined process with a distinctive structure which can be described. It argues that, in order to describe gossip and other forms of casual conversation, two perspectives are needed: a synoptic approach which looks for complete, static, unified products or texts (generic approach) and a dynamic approach to conversational analysis which focuses on the processes by which moves succeed moves. The latter perspective then focuses on the dynamic unfolding of the interaction which occurs in a gossip text. It allows us to describe how the interactants in conversation can expand, in principle, indefinitely move by move.

Published online: 1 January 1994
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aralss.11.03sla
References
Brenneis, D.
(1988) Language and disputing. Annual Review Anthropology 171: 221–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cox, B.
(1967) What is Hopi gossip about? Information management and Hopi factions. Man 21:278–285.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R.
(1992) Why gossip is good for you? New Scientist 21 Nov.Google Scholar
Eggins, S.
(1990) Keeping the conversation going: A systemic-functional analysis of conversational structure in casual sustained talk. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Eggins, S. and D. Slade
forthcoming) The sociolinguistics of casual conversation. Pinter, United Kingdom
Gluckman, M.
(1963) Gossip and scandal. Current Anthropology, 41:307–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K.
(1973) Explorations in the functions of language. London, Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
(1982) How is a text like a clause? In S. Allen (ed)Text processing: Text analysis and generation, Text typology and attribution (Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 51).Stockholm, Almqvist and Wiksell International.Google Scholar
(1985a) An introduction to functional grammar. London, Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
(1985b) Spoken and written language. Geelong, Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K and R. Hasan
(1976) Cohesion in English. London, Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K.
(1981) Type of structure. In M.A.K. Halliday and J.R. Martin (eds.) Readings in systemic linguistics. London, Batsford.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. and R. Hasan
(1985) Language, context and text: aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Geelong, Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. and G. Plum
(1983) On casual conversation. In R. Hasan (ed) Discourse on discourse. Occasional Papers No 71, Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Harding, S.
(1975) Women and words in a Spanish village. In R.R. Reiter (ed.) Towards an anthropology of women. New York, Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Hasan, R.
(1985) Linguistics, language and verbal art. Geelong, Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Haviland, J.B.
(1977) Gossip, reputation and knowledge in Zinacantan. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W and J. Waletzky
(1967) Narrative analysis: oral versions of personal experiences. In J. Helm (ed.) Essays on the verbal and visual arts. American Ethnological Society. Proceedings of Spring Meeting, 1966, University of Washington Press: Washington, D.C.:12–14.Google Scholar
Martin, J.R.
(1985) Factual writing: Exploring and challenging social reality. Geelong, Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
(1992) English text: System and structure. Philadelphia/ Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J.R. and J. Rothery
(1986) Writing project report No. 4, Working Papers in Linguistics. Linguistics Department, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T.F.
(1957) The language of buying and selling texts in Cyrenaica: a situational statement. Hesperis 261. Reprinted in T.F. Mitchell (1975) Principles of Firthian linguistics (Longmans Linguistics Library), London, Longman.Google Scholar
Plum, G.
(1988) Text and contextual conditioning in spoken English: a genre-based approach. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Linguistics Department, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Poynton, C.
(1984) Forms and functions: names as vocatives. Nottingham Linguistics Circular, 131:1–34.Google Scholar
Slade, D.
(1986) Teaching casual conversation to adult ESL learners. Prospect 2, 1:68–87Google Scholar
(1989) Discourse analysis of spoken English: What can generic analysis offer to the description of spoken interaction? Department Seminar, Linguistics Department, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
(1990) Talk between friends: Two complementary perspectives on the analysis of casual conversation. Seminar Paper, Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Slade, D. and R. Gardner
(1987) Interactional skills in casual conversation. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 8, 1:105–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slade, D. and L. Norris
(1986) Teaching casual conversation.: topics, strategies and interactional skills. National Curriculum Resource Centre, NSW.Google Scholar