Article published in:The Language Testing Cycle: From inception to washback
Edited by Gillian Wigglesworth and Catherine Elder
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. Series S 13] 1996
► pp. 137–187
How valid is it as the basis for content-referenced descriptors of test performance?
This paper describes a methodology for exploring the validity of the Rasch scaling procedure in relation to a multiple-choice test of reading Chinese as a foreign language. The validation procedure involved a post hoc content analysis of test items to identify factors which the research literature on early reading indicated were likely to be related to item difficulty. A comparison was then made between these difficulty factors and the item-difficulty ranking produced by a Rasch analysis of test items. The analysis revealed that the dimension mapped out by the Rasch scaling (and to some extent the corresponding wording of the reporting descriptors) does indeed reflect certain elements thought to be related to early reading ability.
Published online: 01 January 1996
Alderson, J.C. and Y. Lukmani
Allen, E.D. and R.M. Vallette
Anderson R. and P. Freebody
Australian Council for Educational Research
Blum, S. and E. A. Levenston
Dale, E. and J.S. Chall
Dollerup, C. E. Glahn and C.R. Hansen
Elder, C. and S. Zammit
Everson, M. F.
Freebody, P. and R Anderson
Halliday, M.A.K., A. Mcintosh and P. Strevens
Huckin, R., M. Haynes and J. Coady
LaBerge, D. and S.J. Samuels
McKeown, M.G. and M.E. Curtis
Mossensen, L., P. Hill and G. Masters
Mullis, I.V.S. and L.B. Jenkins
Raugh, M.R. and R Atkinson
Schneider, W. and R.M. Shiffrin
Shiffrin R.M. and W. Schneider
Williams, E. and C. Moran
Cited by 1 other publications
Yunjiu, Luo, Wei Wei & Ying Zheng
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.