Cover not available
Article published In:
Issues in the Teaching and Learning of Japanese
Edited by Nicolette Bramley and Naoko Hanamura
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. Series S 15] 1998
► pp. 169–182

Vocabulary acquisition by advanced learners

Factors that cause difficulty for advanced learners

| The Australian National University
This paper looks at the acquisition of the vocabulary used in daily conversation by advanced level English speaking learners of Japanese language. Five factors which were found to affect learners’ acquisition are discussed. The aim of this paper is to discuss lexical errors made by advanced learners of Japanese and identify the factors which hinder their lexical acquisition by focusing on intralexical factors and interlexical factors. The data was obtained from interviews with fourteen advanced level students. The findings of the study reveal that interlexical divergence of semantic structure is the most common reason for advanced learners failure to acquire vocabulary in the target language. This finding highlights the difficulty learners face in comprehending the lexical semantic structure in the target language and maintaining all the lexical items which correspond to single word in their native language. Intralexical phonological similarity is also a confounding factor for learners. These findings are relevant in the context of vocabulary teaching from the aspect of facilitating learners’ semantic knowledge.
Published online: 1 January 1998
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aralss.15.11yos
References (26)
References
Allen E.D. and Vallette R.M. (1972) Modern Language Classroom Techniques: A Handbook. New York, Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Asano, Y. (1981) Goi. Tokyo, The Japan Foundation.Google Scholar
Backhouse, A.E. (1981). Japanese verbs of dress. Journal of Linguistics 171:17–29.Google Scholar
Channell, J. (1988) Psycholinguistic consideration in the study of L2 vocabulary acquisition. In R. Carter and M. McCarthy (eds) Vocabulary and Language Teaching. London & New York, LongmanGoogle Scholar
Dagut, M. (1977) Incongruences in lexical ‘girding’ and application of contrastive semantic analysis to language teaching. International Review of Applied Linguistics 151:221–229Google Scholar
Doughty, C. (1991) Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13,4:431–69Google Scholar
Fay D. and Cutler A. (1977) Malapropisms and the Structure of the Mental Lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 81:505–520.Google Scholar
German, M. (1990). Psycholinguistics. New York, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Honeyfield, J. (1977) Word frequency and the importance of context in vocabulary learning. RELC Journal 81:35–42Google Scholar
Kageyama, T. (1980). Nichi-ei hikaku gengo no koozoo. Tokyo, Shoohakusha.Google Scholar
Laufer, B. (1986) Possible changes in attitude towards vocabulary acquisition research. International Review of Applied Linguistics 241:69–77.Google Scholar
(1990a) ‘Sequence’ and ‘order’ in the development of 12 lexis: some evidence from lexical confusion. Applied Linguistics 11,3:281–296.Google Scholar
(1990 b) Why some words more difficult than others? Some Intralexical factors that affects the learning of words International Review of Applied Linguistics 28,4:293–307Google Scholar
(1990 c) Words you know: how they affect the words you learn. In J. Fisiak (ed.) (1990) Further Insights into Contrastive Analysis. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Levenston, E. (1979) Second Language Acquisition: Issues and problems. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin 41:147–160.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. (1978) Notes on Japanese clothing verbs. In J. Hinds and I. Howards (eds) Problems in Japanese Syntax and Semantics. Tokyo, Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Morita, Y. (1991) Goi to sono imi. Tokyo, ALK Inc.Google Scholar
Rudzka, B., B. Channell, Y. Putseys and P. Ostyn (1981) The Words You Need. London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Richards, J., J. Piatt and H. Weber (1985) Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. Hong Kong, Longman.Google Scholar
Rivers, W. (1983) Communicating Naturally in a Second Language. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (1988) A Hallidayan Framework for Vocabulary Teaching – An Approach to Organising the Lexical Content of An EFL Syllabus International Review of Applied Linguistics 13,3:229–237Google Scholar
Stevick, E. (1976). Memory, Meaning and Method. Rowley, MA, Newbury House.Google Scholar
Suzuki, T. (1978) Reflection on Japanese language and culture. Tokyo, Keio University Press.Google Scholar
Terao, Y. (1989) Godaiyoo no iiayamari to shinteki goi bumon no koozoo (The Structure of Word Substitution Errors and Mental Lexicon). Collected Articles on the Japanese Language 26,1:53–61.Google Scholar
Van Els, et al. (1984) Applied Linguistics and the Learning and Teaching of Foreign Languages. London, Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Yoshida, M. (1978). The acquisition of English vocabulary by a Japanese-speaking child. In E.M. Hatch (ed.) Second Language Acquisition: A Book of Readings. Rowley, MA., Newbury House Publishers.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Tsukada, Kimiko
2012. Preliminary report on theKanjiandKatakana(K2) gym: out-of-class character/vocabulary learning activities for Japanese language learners. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 6:1 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.