Article published in:
Discourse Analysis and Language Teaching
Edited by Eva Alcón-Soler and Josep R. Guzman Pitarch
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. Series S 16] 2000
► pp. 31–47

Resources for delicate manoeuvres

Learning to disagree

| University of New South Wales
Published online: 01 January 2000
https://doi.org/10.1075/aralss.16.03gar
References
Alcón , E. and D. Tricker
forthcoming) The use of ‘well’ in spoken interaction: an example of what language teachers and learners can get from analysing spoken discourse. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics.
Atkinson, J. and P. Drew
(1979) Order in court: the organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London, Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barraja-Rohan, A. and C. Pritchard
(1997) Beyond Talk. Footscray, Western Melbourne Institute of TAFE.Google Scholar
Bergmann, J.
(1992) Veiled morality: notes on discretion in psychiatry. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at work. Cambridge, CUP.Google Scholar
Boden, D.
(1994) The business of talk: organizations in action. Cambridge, Polity.Google Scholar
Boden, D. and D. Zimmerman
(eds) (1984) Talk and social structure. Cambridge, Polity.Google Scholar
Clayman, S. and J. Whalen
(1988/9) When the medium becomes the message: the case of the Rather-Bush encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 221, 241–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drew, P. and J. Heritage
(1992a) Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds).Google Scholar
(eds) (1992b) Talk at work. Cambridge, CUP.Google Scholar
Foll, D. and A. Kelly
(1994) First Certificate: Avenue. Cambridge, CUP.Google Scholar
Gardner, R.
(1997) The conversational token Mm: A weak acknowledging token. Research on Language and Social Interaction 30,2:131–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Between listening and speaking: The vocalisation of understandings. Applied Linguistics 19,2:204–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greatbatch, D.
(1992) On the management of disagreement between news interviewees. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds).Google Scholar
Heritage, J.
(1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, Polity.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. and D. Greatbatch
(1991) On the institutional character of institutional talk: The case of news interviews. In D. Boden and D. Zimmerman (eds).Google Scholar
Jones, L.
(1977) Functions of English: Upper Intermediate to Advanced. Cambridge, CUP.Google Scholar
King, S. and B. Paltridge
(1991) Context: An Australian Intensive Listening Course. Sydney, Longman.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C.
(1993) Context and culture in language eaching. Oxford, OUP.Google Scholar
Levinson, S.
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge, CUP.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liddicoat, A. and C. Crozet
eds Teaching languages, teaching culture Australian Review of Applied Linguistics Series S No. 141
Maynard, D.
(1991) Perspective-display sequences and the delivery and receipt of diagnostic news. In D. Boden and D. Zimmerman (eds).Google Scholar
(1992) On clinicians co-implicating recipients’ perspective in the delivery of diagnostic news. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds).Google Scholar
Mehan, H.
(1979) Learning lessons: social organization in the classroom. Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Molinsky, S. and B. Bliss
(1989) International Expressways: Intermediate. New York, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Ochs, E., E. Schegloff and S. Thompson
(eds) (1996) Interaction and grammar. Cambridge, CUP.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, A.
(1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge, CUP.Google Scholar
Rutherford, W.
(1987) Second language grammar: learning and teaching. London, Longman.Google Scholar
Sacks, H.
(1987) On the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button and J. Lee (eds) Talk and social organisation. Clevedon, Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.
(1972) Notes on conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (ed.) Studies in social interaction. New York, Free Press.Google Scholar
(1982) Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of “uh huh” and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (ed.) Analyzing discourse: text and talk. Washington DC, Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
(1987) Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly 50,2:101–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D.
(1987) Discourse markers. Cambridge, CUP.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sharwood-Smith, M.
(1981) Consciousness-raising and the second language learner. Applied Linguistics 2,2:159–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Soars, J. and L. Soars
(1987) Headway: Upper Intermediate. Oxford, OUP.Google Scholar
(1989) Headway: Advanced. Oxford, OUP.Google Scholar
(1991) Headway: Pre-intermediate. Oxford, OUP.Google Scholar
(1993) Headway: Elementary. Oxford, OUP.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. and M. Saville Troike
(1985) Perspectives on silence. Norwood, NH, Ablex.Google Scholar
Viney, P.
(1978) Streamline English: Departures: Beginners. Oxford, OUP.Google Scholar
(1979) Streamline English: Connections: Pre-intermediate. Oxford, OUP.Google Scholar
(1982) Streamline English: Destinations: Intermediate. Oxford, OUP.Google Scholar
(1985) Streamline English: Directions: Upper Intermediate. Oxford, OUP.Google Scholar
Watcyn-Jones, P.
(1979) Impact: English for Social Interaction. Harmondsworth, Penguin.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Waring, Hansun Zhang
2018. Teaching L2 interactional competence: problems and possibilities. Classroom Discourse 9:1 ► pp. 57 ff. Crossref logo
Waring, Hansun Zhang
2019.  In Second Handbook of English Language Teaching [Springer International Handbooks of Education, ], ► pp. 1053 ff. Crossref logo
Waring, Hansun Zhang
2019.  In Second Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education [Springer International Handbooks of Education, ], ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.