Cover not available
Article published In:
Discourse Analysis and Language Teaching
Edited by Eva Alcón-Soler and Josep R. Guzman Pitarch
[Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. Series S 16] 2000
► pp. 49–63

Discussion as dyadic interaction

Lessons from a corpus

| The University of New South Wales
Published online: 1 January 2000
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aralss.16.04tab
References
Bublitz, W.
(1988) Supportive Fellow-Speakers and Cooperative Conversations. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E.
(1961) Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Indianapolis, New York, Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
(1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior. Chicago, Aldine Publishing.Google Scholar
(1974) Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kaneman-Pougatch, M.
(1996) Pour évaluer l’argumentad on órale. Une approche pluridimensionnelle. Le discours: enjeux et perspectives. Le Français dans le monde: Recherches et applications, Numéro spécial juillet 1996: 164–171.Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C.
(1990) Les interactions verbales. Tome 1. Paris, Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Miche, E.
(1995) Les formes de reprise dans un débat parlementaire. Cahiers de Linguistique Française 161:241–265.Google Scholar
Perrin, L.
(1995) Du dialogue rapporté aux reprises diaphoniques. Cahiers de Linguistique Française 161:211–240.Google Scholar
Roulet, E. et al.
(1985) L’articulation du discours en français contemporain. Berne, Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Tabensky, A.
(1996) Jacques, Lionel, John, Paul and the others. A Comparative Study of Political Debate. Paper presented to the 21st Annual Congress of ALAA (Applied Linguistics Association of Australia), University of Western Sydney, Nepean, 3–6 October.
(1997) L’interaction dyadique: analyse d’un corpus vidéo. Paper presented to the Annual AFLS Conference (Association for French Language Studies), Montpellier, 12–l14 September.
(1998a) Pictorial and Deictic Gestures in Spoken Interaction. A Cross-cultural Study. Paper presented to the 23rd Annual Congress of ALAA (Applied Linguistics Association of Australia), Griffith University, 30 June-3 July.
(1998b) Gestes déictiques et métaphoriques dans l’interaction. Une étude comparative trans-culturelle. In Serge Santi, Isabelle Guaïtella, Christian Cavé, Gabrielle Konopczynski (eds) Oralité et gestualité: communication multimodale, interaction. Paris, L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Tannen, D.
(1987) Repetition in conversation: toward a poetics of talk. Language 63,3:574–605. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989) Talking Voices. Repetition, dialogue and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(ed.) (1993) Framing in Discourse. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vion, R.
(1992) La Communication Verbale. Analyse des Interactions. Paris, Hachette Supérieur.Google Scholar
(1995) Les unités du dialogue. Langue órale: ses unités descriptives. Cercle Linguistique d’Aix-en-Provence, Travaux 131:165–180.Google Scholar
(1996) L’analyse des interactions verbales. La construction interactive des discours de la classe de langue. Les carnets du Cediscor 41:19–32.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Hanna, Barbara E. & Juliana de Nooy
2004. Negotiating cross-cultural difference in electronic discussion. Multilingua - Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 23:3 ► pp. 257 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.