The cognitive basis of adjectival and adverbial resultative constructions

Cristiano Broccias | Università di Genova

In this paper I investigate adjectival resultative constructions, which usually do not occur in Romance languages, and adverbial resultative constructions, which are also possible in Romance languages. I claim that adjectival resultative constructions and adverbial resultative constructions rely on different cognitive processes. In particular, I contend that adjectival resultative constructions involve the activation of Langacker's billiard-ball model. Such an analysis turns out to be more satisfactory than formal ones. On the other hand, adverbial resultative constructions, as well as more generally adverbial depictive constructions, are argued to involve the process of property ascription by the conceptualiser and the reference point ability. Finally, I show that adverbial (resultative) constructions exhibit similarities with so-called raising constructions in that both crucially rely on the reference point ability.

Keywords: reference point ability, raising construction, resultative construction, billiard-ball model, property ascription

Published online: 11 January 2005
https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.2.04bro

Cited by

Cited by 14 other publications

Bigolin, Alessandro & Josep Ausensi

2021. A new resultative construction in Spanish? A reply to Rodríguez Arrizabalaga. Folia Linguistica 0:0

Brdar-Szabó, Rita

2019. In , ► pp. 13 ff.

BROCCIAS, CRISTIANO

2008. Towards a history of English resultative constructions: the case of adjectival resultative constructions. English Language and Linguistics 12:1 ► pp. 27 ff.

Broccias, Cristiano

2013. Tying events tight: a reply to Iwata (2006). Language Sciences 38 ► pp. 32 ff.

Cervel, Ma Sandra Peña

2009. Constraints on subsumption in the caused-motion construction. Language Sciences 31:6 ► pp. 740 ff.

Dingfang, Shu

2009. Cognitive Approaches to Lexical Semantics. Language and Linguistics Compass 3:1 ► pp. 314 ff.

Ki-Sun Hong

2011. English Resultative Construction and Korean “key” Construction. Korean Journal of Linguistics 36:4 ► pp. 1143 ff.

Li, Chao

2013. Mandarin resultative verb compounds: Simple syntax and complex thematic relations. Language Sciences 37 ► pp. 99 ff.

Peña Cervel, María Sandra

2016. Argument structure and implicational constructions at the crossroads. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:2 ► pp. 474 ff.

Peña Cervel, María Sandra

2017. In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58], ► pp. 175 ff.

Peña-Cervel, M. Sandra

2016. Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying Fake Reflexive Resultatives*. Australian Journal of Linguistics 36:4 ► pp. 502 ff.

Romagno, Domenica

2020. Strong resultative constructions in Romance between usage and norm. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34 ► pp. 295 ff.

Rosca, Andreea

2014. How an idea germinates into a projext or the intransitive resultative construction with Entity-Specific change-of-state verbs. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 9:1 ► pp. 97 ff.

Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco J. & Ignasi Miró Sastre

2019. On the cognitive grounding of agent-deprofiling constructions as a case of pretense constructions. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:2 ► pp. 573 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.