Review article published in:Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Volume 2
Edited by Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
[Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 2] 2004
► pp. 321–348
Why Construction Grammar is radical
Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. .
This article reviews some of the foundational assumptions of Croft'sRadical Construction Grammar. While constructions have featured prominently in much recent work in cognitive linguistics, Croft adopts the ‘radical’ view that constructions are the primary objects of linguistic analysis, with lexical and syntactic categories being defined with respect to the constructions in which they occur. This approach reverses the traditional view, according to which complex expressions are compositionally assembled through syntactic rules operating over items selected from the lexicon. The ubiquity of idioms, especially so-called constructional idioms, provides compelling evidence for the essential correctness of the radical constructional view. The possibility of a radical constructional approach to phonology is also discussed.
Published online: 11 January 2005
Bowerman, M. & Choi, S.
Brooks, P. & Tomasello, M.
Dieseel, H. & Tomasello, M.
Fillmore, C., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. C.
Foolen, A. & van der Leek, F.
Kay, P. & Fillmore, C.
Langacker, R. W.
Michaelis, L. & Lambrecht, K.
Tomasello, M. & Brooks, P.
Cited by 2 other publications
Macis, Marijana & Norbert Schmitt
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.