Constructions with get
How to get the picture without getting confused
The present article analyzes the copular realization of GET in relation to its lexical transitive, intransitive motion and passive realizations. The change-of-state construction was previously defined by the author as X CHANGES TO Ystate. If COME, GO, TURN… copular realizations were proved to be constrained (Bonnefille, 2001 and 2004; Bonnefille & McMichael, 2001) by X MOVES TO Ylocation (Goldberg, 1995), the search for real-world constraints at work in this construction when used with GET leads us to the conclusion that the copular realization of GET is constrained by the blending of two constructions, i.e. X MOVES TO Ylocation and either X EXPERIENCES Y (with the meaning “receiving an object”) or X ACTS ON Y (with the meaning “obtaining/possessing an object”), depending on the degree of agenthood of X.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Norvik, Miina
2020.
The expression of change-of-state in the Finnic languages.
Open Linguistics 6:1
► pp. 171 ff.
Tsai, Mei-Hsing
2020.
The effects of explicit instruction on L2 learners’ acquisition of verb–noun collocations.
Language Teaching Research 24:2
► pp. 138 ff.
Tsai, Mei‐Hsing
2020.
Teaching L2 collocations through concept‐based instruction: The effect of L2 proficiency and congruency.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:3
► pp. 553 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.