This paper aims to show how a clear perspective on the cognitive systems and processes involved in language production can help to solve a number of persistent problems in the analysis of TAM and related categories, and particularly of the semantic categories of deontic modality, volition, intention and directivity, notions which raise the issue of the relationship between qualificational categories and illocutionary categories, and what these stand for/how these should be represented in a model of the human linguistic faculty.
2024. Desire, moral evaluation or sense of duty: The modal framing of stated preference elicitation. Environmental Values 33:4 ► pp. 434 ff.
YI, Linya & Yoshiki OGAWA
2024. Comparison of the Verb of Motion GO in English and Chinese in Terms of Grammaticalization. Interdisciplinary Information Sciences 30:1 ► pp. 13 ff.
Coussé, Evie & Gerlof Bouma
2022. Semantic scope restrictions in complex verb constructions in Dutch. Linguistics 60:1 ► pp. 123 ff.
Koohkan, Sepideh & Jan Nuyts
2021. Grammaticalization and (inter)subjectification in an Iranian modal verb: A paradox resolved by Dutch. Australian Journal of Linguistics 41:4 ► pp. 389 ff.
2015. A Modal Meaning of –eoya hada. Journal of Korean Linguistics null:76 ► pp. 95 ff.
Donghyeok Lee
2016. On the relations between modal meaning of -eodo doida and permissive speech act and politeness. Urimalgeul: The Korean Language and Literature 69:null ► pp. 23 ff.
2014. Meaning change in the Dutch core modals: (Inter)subjectification in a grammatical paradigm. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 46:1 ► pp. 85 ff.
Nuyts, Jan
2013. De-auxiliarization without de-modalization in the Dutch core modals: a case of collective degrammaticalization?. Language Sciences 36 ► pp. 124 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.