Review published In:
Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Volume 7Edited by Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
[Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7] 2009
► pp. 319–325
Edited by Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
[Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7] 2009
► pp. 319–325
Book review
. Current Trends in Contrastive Linguistics: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives [Studies in Functional & Structural Linguistics, 60]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, . https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.60
Reviewed by
References (19)
Agard, F. & R. Di Pietro. (1965). The Grammatical Structure of English and Italian. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Barlow, M. & S. Kemmer (Eds.). (2000). Usage-based Models of Language. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.
Colleman, T. (2008). Verb disposition in argument structure alternations. A corpus study of the Dutch dative alternation. Language Sciences 
; [URL]
; [URL]Colleman, T. & B. De Clerck. (2009). Caused motion’? The semantics of the English ‘to’-dative and the Dutch ‘aan’-dative. Cognitive Linguistics, 20(1), 5–42.
Corder, P. (1967). The significance of learners’ erorrs. IRAL, 41, 161–170. [Reprinted in J. C. Richards (Ed.). (1974). Error Analysis (pp. 9–27). London: Longman]
Dirven, R. (2005). Major strands in cognitive linguistics. In Cognitive Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction, Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco J., and Sandra Pena Cervel (Eds.), 69–100. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dirven, R. & M. Verspoor (Eds.). (2004). Cognitive Exploration of Language and Linguistics. Second Revised Edition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Dirven, R. & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza. (forthcoming). Looking back at 30 years of Cognitive Linguistics. In E. Tabakowska (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics in Action: From Theory to Application and Back. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter; vol. In preparation.
Geeraerts, D., S. Grondelaers & P. Bakema. (1994). The Structure of Lexical Variation: Meaning, Naming, and Context. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gries, S.Th., B. Hampe & D. Schonefeld. (2005). Converging evidence: Bringing together experimental and corpus data on the association of verbs and constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(4), 635–676.
Kemmer, S. E. & M. Israel. (1994). Variation and the usage-based model. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (2), Chicago, Ill.: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Krzeszowski, T-P. (1990). Contrasting Languages. The Scope of Contrastive Linguistics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kufner, Ht. (1962). The Grammatical Structures of English and German. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across Cultures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1988). A usage-based model. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 127–161). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(1991). A usage-based model. (Chapter 101). In R. W. Langacker, Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar (pp. 261–288). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Paulussen, H. (1995). Compiling a trilingual parallel corpus. Contragram, 31, 10–13. Ghent: University of Ghent.
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon (pp. 225–282). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2000). Chapter 1: Lexicalization patterns. In L. Talmy, Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. II: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring (pp. 21–146). Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.