Cover not available
Part of
Translation in Transition: Human and machine intelligence
Edited by Isabel Lacruz
[American Translators Association Scholarly Monograph Series XX] 2023
► pp. 130–156

Chapter 7
Subtitling in transition

The case of TED Talks

| Fondazione Bruno Kessler | University of Trento
| University of Warwick, UK | University of the Free State, South Africa
One of the largest projects of volunteer subtitling is the TED Talk Translators programme, with more than 3000 talks subtitled in 115 languages, the programme has been constantly adapting to respond to the increasing popularity of TED Talks with a robust quality assurance process, training material and adoption of tools. In this work, we pose the question of whether this constant transition and refinement of the workflows has an effect on the quality of the subtitles and their adequacy. Our corpus-based investigation using subtitling and linguistic features provides evidence in favour of a chronological transition from a “plain” translation of the source transcript, which does not consider subtitling constraints, to well-formed subtitles.
Keywords: subtitling, length, TED, non-professional, volunteer, interjections, discourse markers
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1The TED translators programme
    • 2.2TED Translators workflow and contributors
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Data
    • 3.2Methodology
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Length conformity
    • 4.2Mean subtitle length and reading speed
    • 4.3Interjections
    • 4.4Features of oral discourse
    • 4.5Cross-lingual analysis of features of oral discourse
      • So
      • I mean
      • Oh
      • Now
      • Right?
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • TED Talks
  • Appendix
Published online: 26 July 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.xx.07kar
References (36)
References
Amara. Award-winning Subtitle Editor and Enterprise Offerings. [URL]. Last accessed on 20 February 2021.
Bogucki, Łukasz. 2009. “Amateur Subtitling on the Internet.” In Audiovisual Translation, ed. by Jorge Díaz Cintas, and Gunilla Anderma, 49–57. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruti, Silvia, and Serenella Zanotti. 2012. “Orality Markers in Professional and Amateur Subtitling: The Case of Vocatives and Address Pronouns.” In Film Translation from East to West. Dubbing, Subtitling and Didactic Practice, ed. by Claudia Buffagni, and Beatrice Garzelli, 167–192. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2016. “Fansubbing in Close-up: a Study of Interjections and Discourse Markers.” In Non-Professional Interpreting and Translation in the Media, ed. by Rachele Antonini, and Chiara Bucaria, 231–256. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Cattoni, Roldano, Mattia Antonino Di Gangi, Luisa Bentivogli, Matteo Negri, and Marco Turchi. 2021. “MuST-C: A Multilingual Corpus for end-to-end Speech Translation”. Computer Speech and Language Journal 66: 101155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cettolo, Mauro, Christian Girardi, and Marcello Federico. 2012. “WIT3: Web Inventory of Transcribed and Translated Talks”. In Proceedings of the 16th EAMT Conference, 261–268. Trento, Italy.Google Scholar
Chaume, Frederic. 2004. “Discourse Markers in Audiovisual Translating”. Meta: Journal des traducteurs / Meta: Translators’ Journal 49 (4): 843–855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delabastita, Dirk. 1989. “Translation and Mass-communication.” Babel. Revue International de La Traduction / International Journal of Translation 35 (4): 193–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Cintas, Jorge, and Pablo Muñoz Sánchez. 2006. “Fansubs: Audiovisual Translation in an Amateur Environment”. JoSTrans, The Journal of Specialised Translation 6: 37–52.Google Scholar
Ferrer Simó, María Rosario. 2005. “Fansubs y scanlations: la influencia del aficionado en los criterios profesionales.” Puentes 6: 27–43.Google Scholar
Freddi, Maria, and Chiara Malagori. 2014. “Discourse Markers in Audiovisual Translation.” In Multimodal Epistemologies: Towards an Integrated Framework, ed. by Arianna Maiorani, and Christine Christie, 191–209. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heiss, Christine, and Marcello Soffritti. 2008. “Forlixt 1 – The Forlì Corpus of Screen Translation: Exploring Microstructures.” In Between Text and Image. Updating Research in Screen Translation, ed. by Delia Chiaro, Christiane Heiss, and Chiara Bucaria, 51–62. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, James. 1983. “The Functions of Tag Questions.” English Language Research Journal 3: 40–65.Google Scholar
Jansen, Dean, Aleli Alcalá, and Francisco Guzmán. 2014. “Amara: A Sustainable, Global Solution for Accessibility, Powered by Communities of Volunteers.” In Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Design for All and Accessibility Practice, ed. by Constantine Stephanidis, and Margherita Antona. 8th International Conference, UAHCI 2014, Held as Part of HCI International 2014, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, June 22–27, 2014, Proceedings, Part IV. 401–411. DOI logo
Jiménez-Crespo, Miguel Ángel. 2011. “From many one: Novel approaches to Translation Quality in a Social Network Era.” Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series – Themes in Translation Studies 10: 131–152.Google Scholar
. 2017. Crowdsourcing and Online Collaborative Translations. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karakanta, Alina, Matteo Negri, and Marco Turchi. 2020. “MuST-Cinema: a Speech-to-Subtitles Corpus.” In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2020), 3727–3737. Marseille, France.Google Scholar
Leonard, Sean. 2005. “Progress against the Law: Anime and Fandom, with the Key to the Globalization of Culture.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 8 (3): 281–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Mathias, and Martin Volk. 2013. “Statistical Machine Translation of Subtitles: From Opensubtitles to TED.” In Language Processing and Knowledge in the Web, ed. by Iryna Gurevych, Chris Biemann, and Torsten Zesch, 132–138. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orrego-Carmona, David. 2016. “Internal Structures and Workflows in Collaborative Subtitling.” In Non-professional Interpreting and Translation in the Media, ed. by Rachele Antonini, and Chiara Bucaria, 211–230. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Orrego-Carmona, David, and Yvonne Lee. 2017. “Non-Professional Subtitling.” In Non-Professional Subtitling, ed. by David Orrego-Carmona, and Yvonne Lee, 1–12. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Pym, Anthony, David Orrego-Carmona, and Esther Torres-Simón. “Status and technology in the professionalisation of translators. Market disorder and the return of hierarchy.” JoSTrans, the Journal of Specialised Translation 25 (2016): 33–53.Google Scholar
Qi, Peng, Yuhao Zhang, Yuhui Zhang, Jason Bolton and Christopher D. Manning. 2020. “Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languages.” In Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) System Demonstrations. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stede, Manfre, Tatjana Scheffler and Amália Mendes. 2019. “Connective-Lex: A Web-Based Multilingual Lexical Resource for Connectives.” Discours 24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Christopher. 2002. “The Subtitling of Film Dialogue: An Economic Use of Language.” In The Economy Principle in English: Linguistic, Literary and Cultural Perspectives, ed. by Giovanni Iamartino, Marialuisa Bignami and Carlo Pagetti, 278–288. Milano: Unicopli.Google Scholar
TED – Get started. [URL]. Last accessed on 22 April 2021.
TED – Our Organization. [URL]. Last accessed on 22 April 2021.
TED – Prepare your speaker – Rehearsals. [URL]. Last accessed on 18 April 2021.
TED Translators Cheat-sheet. [URL]. Last accessed on 21 February 2021.
Teich, Elke, José Martínez, and Alina Karakanta. 2021. “Translation, Information Theory and Cognition”. The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Cognition, ed. by Fabio Alves and Arnt Lykke Jakobsen. London: Routledge. Chapter 20. ISBN: 9781138037007. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel, and Sebastian Hoffmann. 2006. “Tag Questions in British and American English.” Journal of English Linguistics, 34(4): 283–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “Tag Questions in English: The First Century.” Journal of English Linguistics, 37 (2): 130–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
TED Talks
Scott Kim. 2008. “The art of puzzles.” [URL]
Nuland, Sherwin. 2001. “How electroshock therapy changed me.” [URL]