Part of
Approaches to Hungarian: Volume 14: Papers from the 2013 Piliscsaba Conference
Edited by Katalin É. Kiss, Balázs Surányi and Éva Dékány
[Approaches to Hungarian 14] 2015
► pp. 6594
References
Albright, Adam
2012Shared neutralizaitons without shared representations. Paper presented at the 20th Manchester Phonology Meeting, 24–26 May, 2012.
Baer, Thomas
1975Investigation of phonation using excised larynxes. Doctoral dissertation. MIT.
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Zoltán G. Kiss
2014Phonological categoricality vs. phonetic gradience: The laryngeal properties of Slovak three-consonant clusters. Paper presented at the 11th Old World Conference in Phonology, Leiden, 22–25 January, 2014.
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Zoltán Kiss
2007A phonetically-based approach to the phonology of [v]: A case study from Hungarian and Slovak. Paper presented at the 4th Old World Conference in Phonology, Rhodes, Greece, 18–21 January, 2007.
2010A phonetically-based approach to the phonology of v: A case-study from Hungarian and Slovak. In Susanne Fuchs, Martine Toda & Marzena Żygis (eds.), Turbulent sounds. An interdisciplinary guide, 103–142. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna, Zoltán Kiss & Katalin Mády
2009Az /s/–/z/ oppozíció fenntartása megnyilatkozás végén [On the contrast of /s/ and /z/ in utterrance-final position in Hungarian]. Paper presented at the Beszédkutatás 2009 conference. Budapest, 16–17 October, 2009.
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Katalin Mády
2012The perception of voicing in fricatives. Paper presented at the 9th Old World Conference in Phonology, Berlin, 19‒22 January, 2012.
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo & Graeme Trousdale
2012Cycles and continua: On unidirectionality and gradualness in language change. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.), Handbook on the history of English: Rethinking and extending approaches and methods, 691–720. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink
2010Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.12, retrieved from [URL].
Bóna, Judit, Tekla Etelka Gráczi & Alexandra Markó
2008Coarticulation rules and speaking style dependency. In Rudolph Sock, Susanne Fuchs & Yves Laprie (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Seminar on Speech Production 2008, 245–248. Strassbourg: Université March Bloch.Google Scholar
Browman, Cathrine & Louis Goldstein
1992Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica 49. 155–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burton, Martha W. & Karen E. Robblee
1997A phonetic analysis of voicing assimilation in Russian. Journal of Phonetics 25. 97–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campos-Astorkiza, Rebeka
2012 Voicing assimilation as gestural blending. Paper presented at the 20th Manchester Phonology Meeting, 24–26 May, 2012.
Charles-Luce, Jan
1985Word-final devoicing in German: Effects of phonetic and sentential contexts. Journal of Phonetics 13. 309–324.Google Scholar
1993The effects of semantic context on voicing neutralisation. Phonetica 50: 28–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Schutter, Georges & Johan Taeldeman
1986Assimilatie van Stem in de Zuidelijke Nederlandse Dialekten. In M. Devos & Johan Taeldeman (eds.), Vruchten van z’n akker: opstellen van (oud-) medewerkers en oud-studenten voor Prof. V. F. Vanacker, 91–133. Ghent: Seminarie voor Nederlandse Taalkunde.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, Daniel A
1985A re-examination of phonological neutralisation. Journal of Linguistics 21. 265–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dinnsen, Daniel A. & Jan Charles-Luce
1984Phonological neutralisation, phonetic implementation, and individual differences. Journal of Phonetics 12. 49–60.Google Scholar
Ernestus, Mirjam
2000Voice assimilation and segment reduction in casual Dutch. Doctoral dissertation. Free University of Amsterdam/Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.
Farnetani, Edda
1997Coarticulation and connected speech processes. In William J. Hardcastle & John Laver (eds.), The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, 371–404. Oxford & Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Field, Andy, Jeremy Miles and Zoë Field
2012Discovering Statistics Using R. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fodor, Katalin
2003A nyelvjárási hangtani jelenségek. [Dialectal phonological phenomena]. In Jenő Kiss (ed.), Magyar dialektológia [Hungarian dialectology], 325–350. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.Google Scholar
Fourakis, Marios & Gregory K. Iverson
1984On the ‘incomplete neutralisation’ of German final obstruents. Phonetica 41. 140–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gráczi, Tekla Etelka
2010A spiránsok zöngésségi oppozíciójának néhány jellemzője [Some characteristics of the voicing contrast of fricatives]. Beszédkutatás 2010. 42–56.Google Scholar
2013Zörejhangok akusztikai fonetikai vizsgálata a zöngésségi oppozíció függvényéban [The acoustic phonetic study of obstruents in the light of voicing contrast]. Doctoral dissertation. Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest.
Hallé, Pierre A. & Martine Adda-Decker
2011Voice assimilation in French obstruents: Categorical or gradient? In John A. Goldsmith, Elizabeth Hume & Leo Wetzels (eds.), Tone and features: A festschrift for Nick Clements, 149–175. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, John
2009Why final devoicing is weakening. In Kuniya Nasukawa & Phillip Backley (eds.) Strength Relations in Phonology, 9–46. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio
2005The Sounds of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jansen, Wouter
2004Laryngeal contrast and phonetic voicing: A laboratory phonology approach to English, Hungarian, and Dutch. Doctoral dissertation. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
Jansen, Wouter & Zoë Toft
2002On sounds that like to be paired (after all): An acoustic investigation of Hungarian voicing assimilation. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics 12. 19–52.Google Scholar
Jassem, Wiktor & L. Richter
1989Neutralisation of voicing in Polish obstruents. Journal of Phonetics 17. 317–325.Google Scholar
Javkin, Hector
1976The perceptual basis of vowel duration differences associated with the voiced/voiceless distinction. Report of the Phonology Laboratory, UC Berkley 1. 78–92.Google Scholar
Jiménez, Jesús & Maria-Rosa Lloret
2008Asimetrías perceptivas y similitud articulatoria en la asimilación de sonoridad del catalán. Cuadernos de Lingüística del I . U. I. Ortega y Gasset 15. 71–90.Google Scholar
Kahlen-Halstenbach, Birthe
1990Zur psychologischen Realität der Auslautverhartung im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für phonetische Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 43. 645–655.Google Scholar
Kingston, John & Randy L. Diehl
1994Phonetic knowledge. Language 70. 419–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kluender, Keith R., Randy Diehl & Beverly A. Wright
1988Vowel length difference before voiced and voiceless consonants: An auditory explanation. Journal of Phonetics 16. 153–169.Google Scholar
Lipski, John M
1989/s/-voicing in Ecuadoran Spanish: Patterns and principles of consonantal modification. Lingua 79. 49–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Massaro, D. & M. Cohen
1983Consonant/vowel ratio: An improbable cue in speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics 24. 477–489.Google Scholar
Myers, Scott
2012Final devoicing: Production and perception studies. In Toni Borowsky, Shigeto Kawahara & Mariko Sugahara (eds.), Prosody matters: Essays in honor of Elisabeth Selkirk, 148–180. London: Equinox Press.Google Scholar
O’Dell, Michael & Robert F. Port
1983Discrimination of word final voicing in German. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 73. Supplement 1.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J
1981The listener as a source of sound change. In Carrie S. Masek, Roberta A. Hendrik & Mary Frances Miller (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior, 178–203. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
1983The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In Peter F. MacNeilage (ed.), The Production of Speech, 189–216. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parker, E., Randy L. Diehl, & Keith R. Kluender
1986Trading relations in speech and non-speech. Perception and Psychophysics 39. 129–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pauliny, Eugén
1979Slovenská fonológia. [Slovak phonology]. Bratislava: Slovenské Pedagogické Nakladateľstvo.Google Scholar
Port, Robert F., Faris M. Mitleb & Michael O’Dell
1981Neutralisation of obstruent voicing in German is incomplete. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 70. Supplement 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Port, Robert F. & Jonathan Dalby
1982C/V ratio as a cue for voicing in English. Perception and Psychophysics 16. 257–282.Google Scholar
Port, Robert F. & Adam P. Leary
2005Against formal phonology. Language 81. 927–964. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinheiro, J., D. Bates, S. DebRoy, D. Sarkar
and the R Development Core Team 2013nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1–108.Google Scholar
R Core Team
2012R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel & Meritxell Mira
2013Voicing assimilation in Catalan three-consonant clusters. Journal of Phonetics 41. 264– 280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, K.L
1979On the voicing of intervocalic s in the Ecuadorian highlands. Romance Philology 33. 132–143.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy
1994The Lexical Phonology of Slovak. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1996Nonsyllabic analysis of voice assimilation in Polish. Linguistic Inquiry 27. 69–110.Google Scholar
Shrager, Miriam
2012Neutralisation of word-final voicing in Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 20. 71–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon, Ellen
2010Phonological transfer of voicing and devoicing rules. Evidence from L1 Dutch and L2 English conversational speech. Language Sciences 32. 63–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siptár, Péter & Miklós Törkenczy
2000The Phonology of Hungarian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slowiaczek, Louisa M. & Daniel A. Dinnsen
1985On the neutralising status of Polish word-final devoicing. Journal of Phonetics 3. 325–341.Google Scholar
Slowiaczek, Louisa M. & Helena J. Szymanska
1989Perception of word-final devoicing in Polish. Journal of Phonetics 17. 205–212.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca
1997Phonetics in phonology: The case of laryngeal neutralisation. Manuscript, UCLA.
Strycharczuk, Patrycja
2012Phonetics–phonology interactions in pre-sonorant voicing. Doctoral dissertation. University of Manchester.
Strycharczuk, Patrycja & Ellen Simon
2013Obstruent voicing before sonorants. The case of West-Flemish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31. 563–588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wells, John C
1982Accents of English (Volumes 1–3). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna
2018. The acquisition of voicing assimilation by advanced Hungarian learners of Spanish. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 31:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Zoltán G. Kiss
2024. Learning and unlearning voicing assimilation. Frontiers in Language Sciences 2 DOI logo
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Zoltán G. Kiss
2020. Neutralisation and contrast preservation. Linguistic Variation 20:1  pp. 56 ff. DOI logo
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Zoltán G. Kiss
2021. The perception of voicing contrast in assimilation contexts in minimal pairs: evidence from Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Academica 68:1-2  pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Zoltán G. Kiss
2023. Production and perception of voicing contrast in assimilation contexts in Hungarian. Journal of Uralic Linguistics 2:1  pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Huszthy, Bálint
2021. Italian preconsonantal s-voicing is not regressive voice assimilation. The Linguistic Review 38:1  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Skarnitzl, Radek & Pavel Šturm
2017. Voicing Assimilation in Czech and Slovak Speakers of English: Interactions of Segmental Context, Language and Strength of Foreign Accent. Language and Speech 60:3  pp. 427 ff. DOI logo
Šturm, Pavel & Lea Tylečková
2019. Dialectal differences in voicing assimilation patterns: The case of Moravian Czech English. AUC PHILOLOGICA 2019:2  pp. 129 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.