Cover not available
Part of
Approaches to Hungarian: Volume 14: Papers from the 2013 Piliscsaba Conference
Edited by Katalin É. Kiss, Balázs Surányi and Éva Dékány
[Approaches to Hungarian 14] 2015
► pp. 65–94

Why do sonorants not voice in Hungarian? And why do they voice in Slovak?

| HAS, Research Institute for Linguistics and Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest
| Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest
This paper investigates the acoustic aspects of voicing assimilation in Hungarian and Slovak, paying special attention to the position before the sonorant consonants /m/ and /l/. With the help of acoustic experiments, we enumerate and compare the acoustic phonetic correlates of laryngeal contrast for the obstruents /t d s z/ in various contexts in the two languages, presenting acoustic evidence of why voiceless obstruents are voiced before sonorants in Slovak but remain voiceless in Hungarian. We show that regressive voicing assimilation — including pre-sonorant voicing and final devoicing in Slovak — is close to be a completely phonologised process in both languages.
Published online: 3 June 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/atoh.14.03bar
References (62)
References
Albright, Adam. 2012. Shared neutralizaitons without shared representations. Paper presented at the 20th Manchester Phonology Meeting, 24–26 May, 2012.
Baer, Thomas. 1975. Investigation of phonation using excised larynxes. Doctoral dissertation. MIT.
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Zoltán G. Kiss. 2014. Phonological categoricality vs. phonetic gradience: The laryngeal properties of Slovak three-consonant clusters. Paper presented at the 11th Old World Conference in Phonology, Leiden, 22–25 January, 2014.
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Zoltán Kiss. 2007. A phonetically-based approach to the phonology of [v]: A case study from Hungarian and Slovak. Paper presented at the 4th Old World Conference in Phonology, Rhodes, Greece, 18–21 January, 2007.
. 2010. A phonetically-based approach to the phonology of v: A case-study from Hungarian and Slovak. In Susanne Fuchs, Martine Toda & Marzena Żygis (eds.), Turbulent sounds. An interdisciplinary guide, 103–142. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna, Zoltán Kiss & Katalin Mády. 2009. Az /s/–/z/ oppozíció fenntartása megnyilatkozás végén [On the contrast of /s/ and /z/ in utterrance-final position in Hungarian]. Paper presented at the Beszédkutatás 2009 conference. Budapest, 16–17 October, 2009.
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Katalin Mády. 2012. The perception of voicing in fricatives. Paper presented at the 9th Old World Conference in Phonology, Berlin, 19‒22 January, 2012.
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo & Graeme Trousdale. 2012. Cycles and continua: On unidirectionality and gradualness in language change. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.), Handbook on the history of English: Rethinking and extending approaches and methods, 691–720. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2010. Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.12, retrieved from [URL].
Bóna, Judit, Tekla Etelka Gráczi & Alexandra Markó. 2008. Coarticulation rules and speaking style dependency. In Rudolph Sock, Susanne Fuchs & Yves Laprie (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Seminar on Speech Production 2008, 245–248. Strassbourg: Université March Bloch.Google Scholar
Browman, Cathrine & Louis Goldstein. 1992. Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica 49. 155–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burton, Martha W. & Karen E. Robblee. 1997. A phonetic analysis of voicing assimilation in Russian. Journal of Phonetics 25. 97–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campos-Astorkiza, Rebeka. 2012 Voicing assimilation as gestural blending. Paper presented at the 20th Manchester Phonology Meeting, 24–26 May, 2012.
Charles-Luce, Jan. 1985. Word-final devoicing in German: Effects of phonetic and sentential contexts. Journal of Phonetics 13. 309–324.Google Scholar
. 1993. The effects of semantic context on voicing neutralisation. Phonetica 50: 28–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Schutter, Georges & Johan Taeldeman. 1986. Assimilatie van Stem in de Zuidelijke Nederlandse Dialekten. In M. Devos & Johan Taeldeman (eds.), Vruchten van z’n akker: opstellen van (oud-) medewerkers en oud-studenten voor Prof. V. F. Vanacker, 91–133. Ghent: Seminarie voor Nederlandse Taalkunde.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, Daniel A. 1985. A re-examination of phonological neutralisation. Journal of Linguistics 21. 265–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dinnsen, Daniel A. & Jan Charles-Luce. 1984. Phonological neutralisation, phonetic implementation, and individual differences. Journal of Phonetics 12. 49–60.Google Scholar
Ernestus, Mirjam. 2000. Voice assimilation and segment reduction in casual Dutch. Doctoral dissertation. Free University of Amsterdam/Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.
Farnetani, Edda. 1997. Coarticulation and connected speech processes. In William J. Hardcastle & John Laver (eds.), The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, 371–404. Oxford & Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Field, Andy, Jeremy Miles and Zoë Field. 2012. Discovering Statistics Using R. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fodor, Katalin. 2003. A nyelvjárási hangtani jelenségek. [Dialectal phonological phenomena]. In Jenő Kiss (ed.), Magyar dialektológia [Hungarian dialectology], 325–350. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.Google Scholar
Fourakis, Marios & Gregory K. Iverson. 1984. On the ‘incomplete neutralisation’ of German final obstruents. Phonetica 41. 140–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gráczi, Tekla Etelka. 2010. A spiránsok zöngésségi oppozíciójának néhány jellemzője [Some characteristics of the voicing contrast of fricatives]. Beszédkutatás 2010. 42–56.Google Scholar
. 2013. Zörejhangok akusztikai fonetikai vizsgálata a zöngésségi oppozíció függvényéban [The acoustic phonetic study of obstruents in the light of voicing contrast]. Doctoral dissertation. Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest.
Hallé, Pierre A. & Martine Adda-Decker. 2011. Voice assimilation in French obstruents: Categorical or gradient? In John A. Goldsmith, Elizabeth Hume & Leo Wetzels (eds.), Tone and features: A festschrift for Nick Clements, 149–175. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, John. 2009. Why final devoicing is weakening. In Kuniya Nasukawa & Phillip Backley (eds.) Strength Relations in Phonology, 9–46. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio. 2005. The Sounds of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jansen, Wouter. 2004. Laryngeal contrast and phonetic voicing: A laboratory phonology approach to English, Hungarian, and Dutch. Doctoral dissertation. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
Jansen, Wouter & Zoë Toft. 2002. On sounds that like to be paired (after all): An acoustic investigation of Hungarian voicing assimilation. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics 12. 19–52.Google Scholar
Jassem, Wiktor & L. Richter. 1989. Neutralisation of voicing in Polish obstruents. Journal of Phonetics 17. 317–325.Google Scholar
Javkin, Hector 1976. The perceptual basis of vowel duration differences associated with the voiced/voiceless distinction. Report of the Phonology Laboratory, UC Berkley 1. 78–92.Google Scholar
Jiménez, Jesús & Maria-Rosa Lloret. 2008. Asimetrías perceptivas y similitud articulatoria en la asimilación de sonoridad del catalán. Cuadernos de Lingüística del I . U. I. Ortega y Gasset 15. 71–90.Google Scholar
Kahlen-Halstenbach, Birthe. 1990. Zur psychologischen Realität der Auslautverhartung im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für phonetische Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 43. 645–655.Google Scholar
Kingston, John & Randy L. Diehl. 1994. Phonetic knowledge. Language 70. 419–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kluender, Keith R., Randy Diehl & Beverly A. Wright. 1988. Vowel length difference before voiced and voiceless consonants: An auditory explanation. Journal of Phonetics 16. 153–169.Google Scholar
Lipski, John M. 1989. /s/-voicing in Ecuadoran Spanish: Patterns and principles of consonantal modification. Lingua 79. 49–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Massaro, D. & M. Cohen. 1983. Consonant/vowel ratio: An improbable cue in speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics 24. 477–489.Google Scholar
Myers, Scott. 2012. Final devoicing: Production and perception studies. In Toni Borowsky, Shigeto Kawahara & Mariko Sugahara (eds.), Prosody matters: Essays in honor of Elisabeth Selkirk, 148–180. London: Equinox Press.Google Scholar
O’Dell, Michael & Robert F. Port. 1983. Discrimination of word final voicing in German. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 73. Supplement 1.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1981. The listener as a source of sound change. In Carrie S. Masek, Roberta A. Hendrik & Mary Frances Miller (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior, 178–203. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
. 1983. The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In Peter F. MacNeilage (ed.), The Production of Speech, 189–216. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parker, E., Randy L. Diehl, & Keith R. Kluender. 1986. Trading relations in speech and non-speech. Perception and Psychophysics 39. 129–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pauliny, Eugén. 1979. Slovenská fonológia. [Slovak phonology]. Bratislava: Slovenské Pedagogické Nakladateľstvo.Google Scholar
Port, Robert F., Faris M. Mitleb & Michael O’Dell. 1981. Neutralisation of obstruent voicing in German is incomplete. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 70. Supplement 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Port, Robert F. & Jonathan Dalby. 1982. C/V ratio as a cue for voicing in English. Perception and Psychophysics 16. 257–282.Google Scholar
Port, Robert F. & Adam P. Leary. 2005. Against formal phonology. Language 81. 927–964. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinheiro, J., D. Bates, S. DebRoy, D. Sarkar and the R Development Core Team. 2013. nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1–108.Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2012. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel & Meritxell Mira. 2013. Voicing assimilation in Catalan three-consonant clusters. Journal of Phonetics 41. 264– 280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, K.L. 1979. On the voicing of intervocalic s in the Ecuadorian highlands. Romance Philology 33. 132–143.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 1994. The Lexical Phonology of Slovak. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. 1996. Nonsyllabic analysis of voice assimilation in Polish. Linguistic Inquiry 27. 69–110.Google Scholar
Shrager, Miriam. 2012. Neutralisation of word-final voicing in Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 20. 71–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon, Ellen. 2010. Phonological transfer of voicing and devoicing rules. Evidence from L1 Dutch and L2 English conversational speech. Language Sciences 32. 63–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siptár, Péter & Miklós Törkenczy. 2000. The Phonology of Hungarian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slowiaczek, Louisa M. & Daniel A. Dinnsen. 1985. On the neutralising status of Polish word-final devoicing. Journal of Phonetics 3. 325–341.Google Scholar
Slowiaczek, Louisa M. & Helena J. Szymanska. 1989. Perception of word-final devoicing in Polish. Journal of Phonetics 17. 205–212.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 1997. Phonetics in phonology: The case of laryngeal neutralisation. Manuscript, UCLA.
Strycharczuk, Patrycja. 2012. Phonetics–phonology interactions in pre-sonorant voicing. Doctoral dissertation. University of Manchester.
Strycharczuk, Patrycja & Ellen Simon. 2013. Obstruent voicing before sonorants. The case of West-Flemish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31. 563–588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wells, John C. 1982. Accents of English (Volumes 1–3). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Zoltán G. Kiss
2024. Learning and unlearning voicing assimilation. Frontiers in Language Sciences 2 DOI logo
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Zoltán G. Kiss
2020. Neutralisation and contrast preservation. Linguistic Variation 20:1 ► pp. 56 ff. DOI logo
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Zoltán G. Kiss
2021. The perception of voicing contrast in assimilation contexts in minimal pairs: evidence from Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Academica 68:1-2 ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Zoltán G. Kiss
2023. Production and perception of voicing contrast in assimilation contexts in Hungarian. Journal of Uralic Linguistics 2:1 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Huszthy, Bálint
2021. Italian preconsonantal s-voicing is not regressive voice assimilation. The Linguistic Review 38:1 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Šturm, Pavel & Lea Tylečková
2019. Dialectal differences in voicing assimilation patterns: The case of Moravian Czech English. AUC PHILOLOGICA 2019:2 ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna
2018. The acquisition of voicing assimilation by advanced Hungarian learners of Spanish. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 31:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Skarnitzl, Radek & Pavel Šturm
2017. Voicing Assimilation in Czech and Slovak Speakers of English: Interactions of Segmental Context, Language and Strength of Foreign Accent. Language and Speech 60:3 ► pp. 427 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.