Chapter published in:
Approaches to Hungarian: Volume 15: Papers from the 2015 Leiden Conference
Edited by Harry van der Hulst and Anikó Lipták
[Approaches to Hungarian 15] 2017
► pp. 65–94

Two positions for verbal modifiers

Evidence from derived particle verbs

| Hungarian Academy of Sciences
| Hungarian Academy of Sciences
This paper brings into question recent proposals that all types of Hungarian verbal modifiers are merged in the complement zone of the verb, and argues that certain verbal particles and resultatives are merged as specifiers in the extended verb phrase. The empirical focus of the paper is inseparable particle verbs. Verbal particles and resultatives do not behave uniformly when it comes to combinability with inseparable particle verbs: some particles and resultatives can co-occur with inseparable particles verbs, while others cannot. We will argue that particles and resultatives that belong to the former group are merged in a specifier position, while those belonging to the latter group are merged in the verb’s complement. Our results also support the view that objects are merged as specifiers rather than as complements (Bowers, 1993; Arad, 1996; Hale & Keyser, 1993; and Den Dikken, 2015b).
Keywords: verbal modifier, (in)separable verbal particle, exhaustive verbal particle, resultative, verb phrase, argument structure
Published online: 24 August 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/atoh.15.03heg
References

References

Ackerman, Farrell
1987 Pronominal incorporation: The case of prefixal adverbs. In István Kenesei (ed.), Approaches to Hungarian 2: theories and analyses, 213–260. Szeged: JATE.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Farrell & Gert Webelhuth
1998 A theory of predicates. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis
2001 Functional structure in nominals: nominalization, and ergativity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref.Google Scholar
2013 Nominal vs. verbal -ing constructions and the development of the English progressive. English Linguistics Research 2(2). 126–140. Crossref.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Gianina Iordăchioaia & Elena Soare
2010 Number/aspect interactions in the syntax of nominalizations: a Distributed Morphology approach. Journal of Linguistics 46. 537–573. Crossref.Google Scholar
Arad, Maya
1996 A minimalist view of the syntax-lexical semantics interface. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 8. 1–30.Google Scholar
Baumer, Donald
2008 On nP: Evidence for a DP-internal phase head. University of Washington MA thesis.Google Scholar
Benkő, Loránd
(ed.) 1967 A magyar nyelv történeti-etimológiai szótára, vol. 1. A-GY. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David
2012 Universals in comparative morphology: suppletion, superlatives, and the structure of words. Current Studies in Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bowers, John
1993 The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24. 591–656.Google Scholar
Caha, Pavel
2009 The Nanosyntax of Case: University of Tromsø, CASTL dissertation.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1993 A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2013 Problems of projection. Lingua 130. 33–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cornilescu, Alexandra & Anca Dinu
2013 Adjectives and specificity. Revue roumaine de linguistique 58(4). 455–480.Google Scholar
Cornilescu, Alexandra & Alexandru Nicolae
2011 On the syntax of Romanian definite phrases: Changes in the patterns of definiteness checking. In Petra Sleeman & Harry Perridon (eds.), The Noun Phrase in Romance and Germanic: Structure, variation, and change, 193–222. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref.Google Scholar
Dékány, Éva
2014 Argument structure and functional projections in Old Hungarian verbal gerunds. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 61(3). 317–361. Crossref.Google Scholar
Dékány, Éva & Veronika Hegedűs
2015 Word order variation in Hungarian PPs. In Katalin É. Kiss, Balázs Surányi and Éva Dékány (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian 14: Papers from the 2013 Piliscsaba conference, 95–120. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref.Google Scholar
Dikken, Marcel den
2006 Relators and linkers: The syntax of predication, predicate inversion, and copulas. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 47. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2007 Phase extension: Contours of a theory of the role of head movement in phrasal extraction. Theoretical Linguistics 33(1). 141. Crossref.Google Scholar
2015a The morphosyntax of alienable and inalienable possession: The Hungarian contribution. In Katalin É. Kiss, Balázs Surányi and Éva Dékány (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian 14: Papers from the 2013 Piliscsaba conference, 121–145. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref.Google Scholar
2015b Raising the subject of the ‘object-of’ relation. In Ángel J. Gallego & Dennis Ott (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 77. 50 years later: Reflections on Chomsky's Aspects, 85–98. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin
2006 The function and the syntax of the verbal particle. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), Event structure and the left periphery. Studies on Hungarian, vol. 68. Studies in natural language and linguistic theory, 17–55. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Embick, David & Rolf Noyer
2001 Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32(4). 555–595. Crossref.Google Scholar
2007 Distributed morphology and the syntax-morphology interface. In Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 289–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eszes, Boldizsár
2005 Experiens alanyú meg igekötős igék szemantikája. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 102. 113–135.Google Scholar
2006 Verbal particles telicizing stative psych verbs. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), Event structure and the left periphery. Studies on Hungarian, vol. 68. Studies in natural language and linguistic theory, 57–74. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farkas, Judit
2013 Az ige analógiájára működő -hAtÓ és -AndÓ konstrukciók. In Szilágyi N. Sándor & Edit Kádár (eds.), Analógia és modern nyelvtudomány, 51–62. Kolozsvár: Erdélyi Múzeum Egyesület.Google Scholar
Filip, Hana
2003 Prefixes and the delimitation of events. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 11(1). 55–101.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken & Samuel Jay Keyser
1993 On the argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Ken Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2002 Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Moris & Alec Marantz
1993 Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Ken Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1994 Some key features of Distributed Morphology. MIT working papers in linguistics 21. 275–288.Google Scholar
Haugen, Jason D.
2009 Hyponymous objects and late insertion. Lingua 119(2). 242–262. Crossref.Google Scholar
Hegedűs, Veronika
2013 Non-verbal predicates and predicate movement in Hungarian: LOT Dissertation Series. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar
2014 A névutós kifejezések grammatikalizációja és belső szerkezeti változásai. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), Magyar generatív történeti mondattan, 154–176. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Kenesei, István
1998 Adjuncts and arguments in VP-focus in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungariaca 4. 61–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 On a multifunctional derivational affix: Its use in relational adjectives or nominal modification and phrasal affixation in Hungarian. Word Structure 7(2). 214–239. Crossref).Google Scholar
Komlósy, Andás
1992 Régensek és vonzatok. In Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), Strukturális magyar nyelvtan 1. Mondattan. [Hungarian structural grammar 1. Syntax], 299–529. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Koster, Jan
1994 Predicate incorporation and the word order of Dutch. In Guglielmo Cinque, Jan Koster, Jean-Yves Pollock, Luigi Rizzi, & Rafaella Zanuttini (eds.), Paths towards Universal Grammar. Studies in honor of Richard S. Kayne, 255–276. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Laczkó, Tibor
2009 On the -ás suffix: word formation in the syntax? Acta Linguistica Hungarica 56(1). 23–114. Crossref.Google Scholar
Lipták, Anikó
2012 Verb-stranding ellipsis and verbal identity: The role of polarity focus. In Marion Elenbaas & Suzanne Aalberse (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 29, 82–96. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref.Google Scholar
2013 The syntax of emphatic positive polarity in Hungarian: Evidence from ellipsis. Lingua 128. 72–94. Crossref.Google Scholar
Lipták, Anikó & István Kenesei
2017 Passive potential affixation: syntax or lexicon? Acta Linguistica Academica 64(1). 45–77.Google Scholar
Mateu, Jeume
2012 Conflation and incorporation processes in resultative constructions. In Violeta Demonte & Louise McNally (eds.), Telicity, change, and state: A cross-categorial view of event structure, 252–278. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matushansky, Ora & Alec Marantz
(eds.) 2013 Distributed Morphology today: Morphemes for Morris Halle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Punske, Jeffrey
2011 Escape hatches and the derivation of the DP. Poster presented at WCCFL 29, April 22–24 2011, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian
2008 Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siddiqi, Daniel
2009 Syntax within the word. Economy, allomorphy and argument selection in Distributed Morphology. Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 138. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref.Google Scholar
Starke, Michal
2009 Nanosyntax: a short primer to a new approach to language. Nordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers in Linguistics 36(1). 1–6.Google Scholar
2014 Towards elegant parameters: Language variation reduces to the size of lexicaly-stored trees. In Carme M. Picallo (ed.), Linguistic variation in the Minimalist Framework Oxford linguistics, 140–152. New York: Oxford University Press. Crossref.Google Scholar
Surányi, Balázs
2009a Locative particle and adverbial incorporation at the interfaces. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), Adverbs and adverbial adjuncts at the interfaces Interface explorations 20, 39–74. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009b Verbal particles inside and outside vP. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 56(2–3). 201–249. Crossref.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2012 Spanning. Ms., University of Tromsø, draft of April 25, 2012. http://​ling​.auf​.net​/lingBuzz​/001501.
Szabolcsi, Anna & Tibor Laczkó
1992 A főnévi csoport szerkezete. [The structure of the noun phrase]. In Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), Strukturális magyar nyelvtan 1. Mondattan. [Hungarian structural grammar 1. Syntax], 181–298. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald
2010 The nanosyntax of Nguni noun class prefixes and concords. Lingua 120(6). 1522–1548. Crossref.Google Scholar
Zwart, Jan-Wouter
1993 Dutch syntax: A minimalist approach: University of Groningen dissertation.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Halm, Tamás
2021. Radically Truncated Clauses in Hungarian and Beyond: Evidence for the Fine Structure of the Minimal VP. Syntax 24:3 ► pp. 376 ff. Crossref logo
Hegedűs, Veronika
2020. Back to restitutives (again): A syntactic account of restitutive and counterdirectional verbal particles in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Academica 67:3 ► pp. 319 ff. Crossref logo
Lipták, Anikó
2018.  In Boundaries Crossed, at the Interfaces of Morphosyntax, Phonology, Pragmatics and Semantics [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 94], ► pp. 327 ff. Crossref logo
Lipták, Anikó & Andrés Saab
2019. Hungarian particle reduplication as local doubling. Acta Linguistica Academica 66:4 ► pp. 527 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.