Chapter published in:
Approaches to Hungarian: Volume 15: Papers from the 2015 Leiden Conference
Edited by Harry van der Hulst and Anikó Lipták
[Approaches to Hungarian 15] 2017
► pp. 95–133

A representational account of vowel harmony in terms of variable elements and licensing

| University of Connecticut
This article develops a new theory of vowel harmony in which harmony is represented in terms of a licensing relationship between vowels that carry the harmonic element ‘invariably’ and vowels that carry this element ‘variably’; the latter vowels are the alternating vowels. Of central concern is the occurrence of opaque and so-called transparent vowels, which cause asymmetries in the harmony systems. I also provide an account of a four-way typology in palatal harmony systems that has been proposed in Kiparsky and Pajusalu (2003). The licensing relation that accounts for vowel harmony is local at the nuclear projection. I will discuss several cases which violate nuclear locality, proposing an auxiliary hypothesis that allows skipping a nucleus under specific circumstances.
Keywords: vowel harmony, transparent vowel, opaque vowel, licensing, locality, Turkish, Tangale, Baiyinna Orochen, Maasai, Hungarian, Khalkha Mongolian, Kinande, Kibudu
Published online: 24 August 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/atoh.15.04hul
References

References

Anderson, John M. & Colin J. Ewen
1987 Principles of dependency phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.
1980 Problems and perspectives in the description of vowel harmony. In Robert M. Vago (ed.), Issues in vowel harmony, 1–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Archangeli, Diana & Douglas Pulleyblank
1994 Grounded phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
Bakovic, Eric
2001 Vowel harmony and cyclicity in Eastern Nilotic. In Charles Chang, Michael J. Houser, Yuni Kim, David Mortensen, Mischa Park-Doob & Maziar Toosarvandani (eds.), 27th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special Session on Afroasiatic Linguistics, 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blumenfeld, Lev & Ida Toivonen
2009 A featural paradox in Votic harmony. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Francisco. Handout.
Charette, Monik & Asli Göksel
1998 Licensing constraints and vowel harmony in Turkic languages. In Eugeniusz Cyran (ed.), Structure and interpretation: Studies in phonology, vol. 4, 65–89. Lublin: Pase.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. & Engin Sezer
(1982) Vowel and consonant disharmony in Turkish. In Harry van der Hulst & Norval Smith (eds.), The structure of phonological representations, part II, 213–255. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida
1988 Transparent vowels. In Harry van der Hulst & Norval Smith (eds.), Features, segmental structure and harmony processes, part II, 39–76. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Dienes, Péter
1997 Hungarian neutral vowels. The Odd Yearbook 1997, 151–180.Google Scholar
2000 Hungarian transparent vowels: An account of Hungarian palatal harmony in terms of Government Phonology. Budapest, Hungary: Eötvös Loránd University, MA thesis.Google Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan
2009 The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gafos, Adamantios I. & Amanda Dye
2011 Vowel Harmony: Transparent and Opaque Vowels. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, vol. 4, 2164–2189. Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gick, Bryan, Douglas Pulleyblank, Fiona Campbell & Ngessimo M. Mutaka
2006 Low vowels and transparency in Kinande vowel harmony. Phonology 23. 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, John & Geoff Lindsey
1995 The elements of phonological representation. In Jacques Durand & Francis Katamba (eds.) Frontiers of Phonology: Atoms, Structures, Derivations, 34–79. London, New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Hulst, Harry van der
2005 The molecular structure of phonological segments. In Phil Carr, Jacques Durand & Colin J. Ewen (eds.), Headhood, elements, specification and contrastivity, 193–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Dependency-based phonologies. In J. Goldsmith, A. Yu and J. Riggle (eds.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 533–570. Second Edition. Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 A framework for vowel harmony. In: Botma, Bert & Roland Noske (eds.), Phonological Explorations: Empirical, Theoretical and Diachronic Issues [Linguistische Arbeiten series], 155–190. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015a Phonological ambiguity. Theoretical Linguistics 2015 41(1–2): 79–87.Google Scholar
2015b The laryngeal class in RcvP and voice phenomena in Dutch. In: Johanneke Caspers, Yiya Chen, Willemijn Heeren, Jos Pacilly, Niels Schiller & Ellen van Zanten (eds.) Above and beyond the segments, 323–349. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2016 Vowel harmony. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics (OnLine).Google Scholar
To appear. Asymmetries in vowel harmony. A representational account. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
in prep. Principles of Radical CV Phonology.
Hulst, Hulst van der & Beata Moskal
2013 Patterns of defective labial vowel harmony in Turkic languages. Dilbilim Araştırmaları [Linguistic Investigations], Theme Issue: Updates to Turkish Phonology. 17–52.Google Scholar
Hulst, Harry van der & Norval Smith
1986 On Neutral vowels. In Koen Bogers, Harry van der Hulst & Maarten Mous (eds.), The phonological representation of suprasegmentals, 233–281. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jungraithmayr, Hermann
1971 The Tangale vowel harmony system reconsidered. Journal of African Languages 10(1). 28–33.Google Scholar
Kabak, Barış
2011 Turkish Vowel Harmony. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, Volume 5, 2831–2854. Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan, Jean Lowenstamm & Jean-Roger Vergnaud
1985 The internal structure of phonological elements: A theory of charm and government. Phonological Yearbook 2. 305–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kidda, Mairo E.
1985 Tangale phonology: A descriptive analysis. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1968/1973 How abstract is phonology? In Osamu Fujimura (ed.), Three Dimensions of Linguistic Theory, 5–56. Tokyo: Taikusha.Google Scholar
1982 From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology. In Harry van der Hulst & Norval Smith (eds.), The structure of phonological representations, part II, 131–177. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul & Karl Pajusalu
2003 Towards a typology of disharmony. The Linguistic Review 20. 217–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kutsch Lojenga, Constance
1994 KiBudu: A Bantu language with nine vowels. Africana Linguistica XI: 127–133. Tervuren: Musée Royal de L’Afrique Centrale.Google Scholar
2008 Nine vowels and ATR vowel harmony in Lika, a Bantu language in D. R. Congo. Africana Linguistica 14. 63–84.Google Scholar
Levergood, Barbara
1984 Rule governed vowel harmony and the strict cycle. In C. Jones and P. Sells (eds.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society 14, 275–293. Amherst, MA: GLSA publications.Google Scholar
Li, Bing
1996 Tungusic vowel harmony: Description and analysis. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam dissertation. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew
2010 Locality in Vowel Harmony. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Painter, Colin
1971 Vowel harmony in Anum. Phonetica 23. 239–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polgárdi, Krisztina
1998 Vowel Harmony. Leiden: University of Leiden dissertation. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
2015 Typology of weak disharmony: representations versus the frontness/backness scale. Theoretical Linguistics 2015, 41(1–2). 89–96.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky
1993 Optimality Theory & Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Technical Report #2 of the Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science. Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey. Google Scholar
Rebrus, Péter & Miklós Törkenczy
2015A Monotonicity and the typology of front/back harmony. Theoretical Linguistics 2015, 41(1–2). 1–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015b The monotonic behaviour of language patterns. Theoretical Linguistics 2015, 41(3–4). 241–268.Google Scholar
Ringen, Catherine
1979 Vowel harmony in Igbo and Diola Fogny. Studies in African Linguistics 10. 247–259.Google Scholar
Ritter, Nancy A.
1995 The role of universal grammar in phonology: A Government Phonology approach to Hungarian. New York: New York University dissertation.Google Scholar
Schlindwein, Deborah
1987 P-bearing units: A study of Kinande vowel harmony. In J. McDonough and B. Plunkett (eds.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society 17, 551–567. Amherst, MA: GLSA publications.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca
1981 Certain parameters of metrical harmony. Generative Linguistics of the Old World (GLOW) 5.Google Scholar
Svantesson, Jan-Olof
1985 Vowel harmony shift in Mongolian. Lingua 67. 283–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Törkenczy, Miklós and peter, rebrus
2011 Hungarian Vowel Harmony. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 2963–2989. Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vago, Robert
1973 Abstract vowel harmony systems in Uralic and Altaic languages. Language 49. 579–605. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Rachel
2011 Vowel Patterns in Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Siptár, Péter
2019. Harry van der Hulst: Asymmetries in vowel harmony: A representational account. With assistance from Jeroen van de Weijer. Acta Linguistica Academica 66:4 ► pp. 621 ff. Crossref logo
van der Hulst, Harry
2017.  In Sonic Signatures [Language Faculty and Beyond, 14], ► pp. 74 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.